Specifications of JF-17

[Clutch]

 

[khanasifm]

It should be pac /paf clarifying if they were mis quoted not a social media third party outlet ?

Does not make sense

https://twitter.com/x/status/1462320742679388165

 

[Bilal.]

It should be pac /paf clarifying if they were mis quoted not a social media third party outlet ?

Does not make sense

https://twitter.com/x/status/1462320742679388165

The poster also quoted the same thrust as vanilla RD93.

 

[iLION12345_1]

It should be pac /paf clarifying if they were mis quoted not a social media third party outlet ?

Does not make sense

https://twitter.com/x/status/1462320742679388165

PSF is not credible, take whatever they post with a grain of salt. Just wait for the Block 3 to enter service. So far the best source we have (PAC itself) shows that the engine is still the same RD93, and it’ll remain that until proven otherwise.

 

[Pandora]

PSF is not credible, take whatever they post with a grain of salt. Just wait for the Block 3 to enter service. So far the best source we have (PAC itself) shows that the engine is still the same RD93, and it’ll remain that until proven otherwise.

Even if RD93MA becomes available which is not the case why would PAC opt for an untested engiene which has no previous track record? RD93 is good enough considering PAF has made no major changes to airframe which would require additional thrust. Block three has no integrated IRST or EWS. I dont get it where people got the idea that Pakistan will opt for RD93MA so quickly after uts development.