I know that...but to simplify the understanding of some retards...I just use their language to explain them how we got Indians government to recognize Tibet and Taiwan...these people don't know the detail of negotiation...they always though that we has lost Sikkim and brag about how many time had won the battle and humiliate us...so i don't even bother to explain and to make long story short...I just said that we have torture Indian government and extract their confession to recognize Tibet and Taiwan.
Torture Indian Government??? LOL. since when did a mutually acceptable deal become torture? we did not give in to US threats during 1971 Indo-pak war and you think we will give in to China because of your "imaginary" torture? very laughable.
It was a plain deal wherein China accepted Sikkim as Indian territory and India accepted Tibet as Chinese territory. This clearly indicates that it was a mutually acceptable deal and not torture as you claim.
want to know what torture is? China pressurizing India to accept Tibet as Chinese territory without China accepting Sikkim as Indian territory. Now that would be torture.
As i said the Chinese are weak in history. you mention the Maratha Confederacy but what about the Maratha Empire? Google Maratha empire. The Maratha Confederacy existed during the decline of the Maratha Empire. Prior to that it was an Empire under the leadership of the Peshwas that stretched upto Afghanistan.
Heard of the Maurya dynasty and Chandragupt Maurya, Bindusara, Ashoka? India was one nation under them. The Mauryan empire stretched upto Iran. just google it and check.
if you claim Taiwan and Tibet as yours because they were within the Ching empire then by your logic i should claim Pakistan and Afghanistan as ours because they were within the Mauryan empire.
India's greatness has been confirmed by western and Chinese people as you can see from the quotes i had posted in my previous post. so i am not bragging but these people have confirmed it. check what Chinese scholars like Hiuen Tsang and Fa-Hien had to say about India.
Hu Shih was talking about culture. culture means customs and civilization of a particular time and people; refined understanding of arts and other intellectual achievement. It is not restricted to religion.
The difference is only imaginary. Chinese were also made slaves when it was occupied by Britain, US, Japan, Russia, France and divided into spheres of Influence.
As i can see, you are conveniently ignoring Chinese history and pointing a finger at Indians. What should i say about you then? Affected by Chronic selective Amnesia or Beliefs of Convenience syndrome?