What's new

South China Sea Forum

China has 56 races. One of the minorities became the ruler of China, China is still Chinese.

To add to your knowledge base, Mongolians in China have 5 million in population. In Mongol, it has only 1 million. Which one is more Mongolian?

Man? The Manchurian are standard Chinese. Do a pitiful you know why the official Chinese is called Manderine?

You wipe them out that is why you are backward in cultural development. Just like the USA, if it were to wipe out Irish, German, Spanish,... only let British stay, that America would be as a sh!thole as your Vietnam.

You are very myopic, and pitifully narrow minded. That is precisely your politics is a copy of China's but with much lower efficiency, and your economy is in such abysmal (5% this year right? :tdown:).





Your logic is ridiculous, to say the least.

In a free world like USA or China, we have access to original documents, without subject to any manipulation (by English or other languages).

Vietnam history is documented overwhelmingly in Chinese, why should I read manipulated English one? Dude, if there are authenticate history books (like《安南志略》、《大越史记全书》、《大越史略》、《越史通鉴纲目》、《历朝宪章类志》、《大南实录), why do anyone need secondhand scr@p? I am intending to read all of them, if there is a chance. That is why I have already collected those names. And I know which parts of the books were likely modified by the old Chinese imperialists. And I believe Mao Ze Dong (or Zhou Enlai) personally apologized to Viet commi about any atrocities his ancestors may committed towards Vietnamese. And the fact is, lots of Vietnamese were also involved in committing the same atrocities or to help the Chinese commit them.

In addition, in thousands of years, there were no Vietnamese as a nation, as Vietnamese were part of Chinese.

Can you tell me what’s wrong with the document on Chinese site? Can you then tell me any discrepancy in terms of the contents whether it is from that site vs any other site (for instance your Dai Viet site, if any?) I can also point you to another Chinese site that contains the same document that is a copy from Japanese site. I only see the contents are the same. That is all my concern.

Back to us. This is what that differentiates us: I love the knowledge whereas you love emotion with not much rationality. A typical example is, due to your crooked thinking, you would probably think download the book from other site would make your Vietnam history different from download it from a Chinese site. What about buy the book from google? 大越史記全書 - 吳士連 - Google Books
? Or read from wiki? https://zh.wikisource.org/zh/大越史記全書/卷首
:rofl:

My comment on your post about Mandarine and Mongolian, mod deleted it.
Now is about histories of USA and UK in comparation with Vietnam and China; North Amerika was colony of Britain and gained his independence from United kingdom, but Vietnam regained his independence from China. You said you have been reading 《大越史记全书》, you have to know well that before the time when Chinese (Qin) expended to the southern area if China mainland, Vietnam was existed as independence state mamed: Au Lac and our Emperor was Hung Vuong and late on An Duong Vuong ( 安暘王). Zhiao Da of Nan Yue Guo is backstabbed An Duong Vuong, betrayed Peace Aggreement with Vietnam. it' was difference story.

the feudalism in Asia based on Confucian idea in China and Vietnam was backward and low efficiency. There is reason why China and Vietnam was losers when facing with western capitalists in the last centuries.
 
.
CMS 17 - the build-up continues

2127431x4j5443mr4veq3x.jpg


02380245cbrs5nzkyw7ty7.jpg
 
. .
China to rule the seas - unmanned


n the cold blue waters between China and Japan, a Chinese fishing craft collided with two Japanese coast guard patrol boats near the uninhabited islands in the East China Sea known as the Diaoyu Islands in China and the Senkaku Islands in Japan. Following the collision on September 7, 2010, coastguards boarded the trawler and arrested the Chinese crew and captain. Following the incident, anti-Japanese protests were held in many Chinese cities, Chinese tour groups visiting Japan were recalled, and a decision was made to suspend the export of rare earths to Japan. [1]

The strength of reaction in this seemingly small-scale maritime accident is a symptom of a deeply rooted conflict. The islands
occupy a sensitive position in China-Japan relations - they were first seized by Japan in the Sino-Japanese war of 1894-5, with the annexation of Taiwan and Korea, followed by the invasion of China by Japan in the 1930s. [2]

The conflict continued as the waters were filled with ships again in October 2012, this time naval ships. The Chinese Navy's East Sea Fleet and civilian maritime patrol agencies conducted their annual joint maneuvers simulating a situation where Japanese law enforcement vessels obstruct and interfere with Chinese maritime surveillance and fisheries administration vessels. The simulated scenario included a collision in which the Chinese ships are damaged and personnel are hurt and fall into the water, requiring further support of a frigate, a hospital ship, a tugboat, advanced fighters and helicopters for support, cover and emergency rescue. [3]

Advance in time to just a few short years later: it is 2015, and drones are returning to special unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) bases, crossing disputed national airspace while surveying activity around the respective islands. [4] The searching multispectral sensor scopes the waters for signs of civilian and military activity near the territories. Tensions heighten due to the ever-present, ever-watching, barely seen spots in the sky.

These scenarios give context to China's recently declared intention to deploy marine surveillance drones to track activity around the archipelagos - an action that may set a precedent for dealing with controversial, disputed territories throughout the region. China's use of drones facilitates an old strategy of perception politics that helps enforce its territorial claims over disputed islands. Drones also expand China's regional military power as they induce broad, invasive footprints of surveillance. Additionally, drones reduce the necessity of maintaining diplomatic sensitivity because they are a dehumanizing tool that further distances surveyors and objects of surveillance, the bullet and the target.

China is developing civilian and military varieties of drone technologies as part of a strategy to "accelerate its transition from territorial air defense to both offensive and defense operations, and to increase its capabilities for carrying out reconnaissance... " [5] The PLA Air Force is investing in long-range reconnaissance and armed drones, [6] and at a pace and lack of transparency disturbing to regional and US military interests. In 2010, China revealed nearly 25 different models of drones at the Zhuhai air show - whereas reports indicate that two years earlier China had displayed only a few models. [7]

The expansion of indigenous drone technology results from US intervention in the early 2000s, when the US leaned on Israel to stop exports of the Harpy UAV to China in response to Taiwanese concerns that the nearly 100 drones would threaten the island's security. [8] At this year's Zhuhai air show, the China Aerospace Science & Industry Corp (CASIC) revealed six new drone models (military and civilian), and Aviation Industry Corp of China marketed an armed Wing Loong UAV. [9]

With future estimates of the value of the Chinese drone industry reaching the billions of dollars, [10] China's rapid development of drone technology is coalescing with regional development into a near future of persistent drone use within Asia. [11] One study conducted by the Teal Group Corporation projects that the Asia-Pacific market for drones may exceed US$8.6 billion, with the number of drones near 7,552 over the next decade. [12] While drones require state investment, Southeast Asia is catching up in the race for drone technology.

And the gods of war flash mischievous grins anew - the emerging drone market in China and broader Asia is an early sign that past intermittent tensions in the region may evolve into persistent conflict.

In past flare-ups between China and Japan over the uninhabited island territories, the tension is perpetuated by nationalist activist groups from the respective states provoking action from the opposing militaries. As the earlier narratives indicated, the flare-up occurs, states rekindle power-flexing rhetoric and economic threats, but eventually tensions dwindle to a smolder, with the parties returning to their corners. And the islands remain relatively non-governmental territories. But, when China begins actively deploying drones for constant surveillance over the islands, China will effectively be establishing territorial domination as a persistent military presence that represents a shift to territorial sovereignty.

The final piece of drone-induced power politics is the dehumanizing nature of drones. Drones are a paradigm-shifting weapon that relax the perceived need for multi-perspective dialogue. Drones create social distance by facilitating dehumanization of opposing parties: they reduce the mutual risk of human cost in both surveillance and strike operations.

British Army officer and former drone operator James Jeffrey, who piloted drone operations in Afghanistan, described the dehumanization that drones facilitate:

"It [drones] makes it [attacks] a lot more acceptable, a lot more palatable; it's on a computer screen... within 10 minutes you've forgotten that it happened and you've moved on. You dehumanize the enemy further, which always happens in war, but it takes it to another... degree." [13]

As dehumanization and increasing social distance become ingratiated in the international relations culture - on a regional and global level - the incentive to understand alternative parties' perspectives diminishes rapidly.

Prior incidents of territorial clashes over the East China Sea islands have generally been characterized by face-to-face encounters with the 'opposition', but future drone activity escalates the potential for perpetual war and reduces the quality of security. Conflict actors may long for the peaceful tension of years past when adversaries had to physically engage with the persons that opposed them.

All factors combined, the subtle shift from human engagement to machines in Asia enhances a perception of China's territorial sovereignty in various arenas of regional disputes, which may lead to a path to perpetual conflict.

And, while it is difficult to accurately predict the consequences of evolving drone activity, it is necessary to explore the potential uses and ramifications of drones. Asia's drone development and proposed future drone use are a signal to governments and societies that a brave new world is fast approaching of Platonic perception politics, surveillance and military conflict. The 'winners' in that world will be those able to adapt the new politics and technology to specific power goals. Today, China looks to be a winner.

Asia Times Online :: China to rule the seas - unmanned
 
.
799px-Vietnam_Marine_Police_vessel_type_4.jpg


large coast guard ships are built by Damen Shipyard (Holland) and Shipyard Song Thu company (Vietnam) in license.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-.../Subject/3b/bd/da/48/Tau-CSB-8001-2.jpg[/IMG]
 
.
Yahoo! we will have some more fun :azn:



Vietnam sets up marine unit to protect fishermen, resources
Thanh Nien News | Thursday, December 06, 2012 09:30:00


C212-Vietnam-Marine-PoliceHR.jpg


7421036622_fa104ffeaa.jpg


C135061_qp_nam_CSBtq_01.jpg


7421053468_af022e5723.jpg


VCG_3.jpg


7409975384_0f40a02fe3.jpg

Vietnamese Coast Guard


The Vietnamese government will establish a Fisheries Management Department next month to patrol the seas, protect fishermen, and generally enforce the law.

The unit will start operating from January 25 under the Directorate of Fisheries.

Luu Van Huy, head of the directorate's Inspection and Legislation Department, was quoted by Nguoi Lao Dong newspaper Tuesday as saying the new department would be a “civilian” force whose job would include protecting marine resources.

To be assisted by soldiers, they will make sure certain fishing areas are used for the right purposes, in the right seasons, and by licensed fishermen. Its inspectors will check if the fishing nets follow requirements related to knot size, and combat the use of electricity, poison, and explosives for fishing.

They can impose cash penalties on violators and even suspend fishing.

The unit will represent the Vietnamese government to inspect foreign boats in Vietnamese waters and impose penalties if required, and protect Vietnamese fishermen in foreign waters.

Dr Tran Cong Truc, former head of a government archives containing sovereignty documents, said the unit would also assist the Coast Guard and Navy in protecting the country’s sovereignty.

Chinese aggression in Vietnam’s eastern waters has been on the rise recently. Many of their boats have attacked Vietnamese fishermen, including with weapons, and held Vietnamese fishermen and their boats for ransom.

Last July a fleet of 30 fishing vessels from China’s island province of Hainan came to fishing grounds in the Truong Sa (Spratly) Islands belonging to Vietnam with the protection of a naval patrol boat.

The new unit will have well-equipped boats that can stay for days at sea and operate in winds of up to level 9 or 88 kilometers per hour.
 
.
Gee,lots of CMS ships:

083857l95bvgnvgkdrr5d3.jpg
 
.
“MSA 01” to visit Australia in May 2013:

192253gliob2u4c3e8b3ll.png


192248x7j3fl4ifj97zwku.png


Having been constantly “harrased” by CMS and CFA ships,Vietnam and the Philippines are yet to confront MSA and CCG vessels。:azn:
 
. .
My comment on your post about Mandarine and Mongolian, mod deleted it.
Now is about histories of USA and UK in comparation with Vietnam and China; North Amerika was colony of Britain and gained his independence from United kingdom, but Vietnam regained his independence from China. You said you have been reading 《大越史记全书》, you have to know well that before the time when Chinese (Qin) expended to the southern area if China mainland, Vietnam was existed as independence state mamed: Au Lac and our Emperor was Hung Vuong and late on An Duong Vuong ( 安暘王). Zhiao Da of Nan Yue Guo is backstabbed An Duong Vuong, betrayed Peace Aggreement with Vietnam. it' was difference story.

the feudalism in Asia based on Confucian idea in China and Vietnam was backward and low efficiency. There is reason why China and Vietnam was losers when facing with western capitalists in the last centuries.


I oppose deleting posts unless some grossly abusive languages are employed ...

I don’t know how and when you can get rid of your crooked thinking, but one sure way is to educate yourself by reading more books from all sides.

China was composed of many independent states, too. So what!

In fact, lots of ancient Vietnamese ran away from Vietnamese brutality and worked for the Chinese, and made their historical achievement with their name in Hall of Fame. Your people 李翁仲 is such a person. Quote (大越史記全書/外紀卷之一): “秦併六國,稱皇帝。時我交趾慈廉人李翁仲,身長二丈三尺。少時往郷吧供力役,為長官所笞。遂入仕秦,至司隷校尉。始皇得天下,使將兵守臨洮,聲振匈奴,及老歸田里卒。始皇以為異,鑄銅為像,置咸陽司馬門,腹中容數十人,濳搖動之,匈奴以為生校尉,不敢犯 “https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/大越史記全書/外紀卷之一
Briefly: 李翁仲 was tall. He was beaten by (Vietnamese) official and ran into Qin and became an official, upto the rank of 司隷校尉. Qin Emperor made him guard against Huns and scared the Huns till he retired to his farm and died there. Emperor thought it was extraordinary, and made a bronze status of him, with a few dozen people inside, shaking it. Huns though he was still alive, daring not invade.

While you are allowed to argue, but at least your famous historian 黎文休 agreed that the Chinese Zhao Tuo (趙佗)was the first who established a country called Vietnam in today’s sense, implying that before that era, Vietnam were merely composed of stateless tribes. He thus said (quote) “赵武帝能开拓我越,而自帝其国,与汉抗衡,书称老夫,为我越倡始帝王之基业,其功可谓大矣。”( 大越史记全书/外纪卷之二, https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/大越史記全書/外紀卷之二 ) briefly: Zhao Wu Di (Zhao Tuo) can establish my Vietnam, and self-enthrones in the state, balancing against Han Dynasty, starting the foundations of Vietnam Dynasties for us, the contribution is extraordinary.

Here we can derive two important conclusions: 1) before Zhao Tuo, Vietnam politically was composed of tribes fighting each other among themselves. None of them could call themselves Vietnam in today’s sense. A country called Vietnam in today’s sense was simply not there. 2) the country called Vietnam in today’s sense, politically and culturally, was established by a Chinese called Zhao Tuo as recognized by your Vietnamese, which could distinguish itself from northern Han Dynasty and defend itself against the northern.

The Chinese mentality seems very different from yours. They never say Mongolians are not ours and Manchurians are foreigners, very much like citizens in USA who never say Mexican or African Americans are not Americans. They consider all other racial components of the country as their same countryman.

In Vietnam, the Chinese were the major component being suppressed as Vietnam communists took over the power. They want to purge Hoa (Chinese) ethnically because they foolishly believe Vietnam has to be ruled by Vietnamese race, similar to Hitler's idea. This is one of the reasons why your Vietnam today is still a sh!thole of economy.

Even today, in this forum, overwhelmingly larger amount of internet Vietnamese demonstrate their the kinds of thoughts via various posts, such as mocking Mongolian or Manchurian invasion of China.

The deep misunderstanding lies in the difference between Chinese and Vietnamese mentalities shaped by geography and over the millenniums of history : 1) China geographically centers in Asia: people moving around Asia have a larger chance to come to China, whereas Vietnam sits in a corner of Indo-China peninsular, with much less temptation for land traveler which was much affordable in old times. Thus, the Chinese are broader minded than Vietnamese. 2) When the Mongolians and Manchurians invaded China, they did not think Chinese culture was inferior and needed to be wiped out or replaced (like British invasion of India or French/China invasion of Vietnam). Rather, those then semi-foreigners believed China&#8217;s culture was superior to their owns but the Chinese rulers needed to be replaced. And those invaders relentlessly adopted/enjoyed Chinese language/culture/tradition as their own. Unlike India or Vietnam situation, where mostly local languages were replaced or suppressed due to being considered less useful or inferior. For the 2nd aspect, please read Dr. Henry Kissinger&#8217;s book <On China>.

This is how Chinese culture and language has never been interrupted despite of so many invasions in the past, and nearly after every breaking up of the country, China reunified with even bigger territory: those &#8220;barbarians&#8221; loved to be civilized or sinicized.

In your guys pitiful thinking, as if bring up Manchurian flag would shame the Chinese, the fact is no Chinese cares :lol: as in Chinese internet, enormous amount of flags from various reasons can be viewed. Do you know the &#8220;Iron blood 13-star&#8221; flag? Do you know Qing navy dragon flag? (BTW, dragon is a typical sign of Chinese culture, but the Manchurian desperately attempted to claim to inherit :lol: . Pitifully and regrettably, not many Manchurian today can write their own backward writings. ) Do you know Chinese Soviet Central Government flag when Mao Ze Dong proposed those provinces should be independent from China? LOL! More importantly, do you know the history and meanings of those flags? Probably not, as you boys bring out those flags with a toddler&#8217;s mentality: pitiful and laughable. :lol:

I think while I respect Vietnamese self-determination (to some destination of either prosperity or destitute), missing out Chinese boat is pretty pitiful and de-sinicization is lamentable as it will, if not handled properly, come with huge collateral damage deep to the root of your country.

And even funnier today: the friendship between Vietnam and China is considered unbelievable by some your internet Vietnamese!

Do your Vietnamese only believe in wars with China? If so, you must be crazy!

BTW, you are not losing to western capitalism, you are losing to your own by the fact that you don't make people live better and only think of war at the expense of their blood. If you keep your foolish ideology while keep people uneducated and poor, and, in your particular case, advocate war against China, you will eventually lose your country as many times happened in your history.
 
.
Philippines puts off 4-way South China Sea talks


MANILA -- The Philippines said Friday it had put off four-way talks due next week over rival claims to the South China Sea but downplayed suggestions the postponement was because of pressure from Beijing.

The Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam had been scheduled to meet on Wednesday but China, which wants disputes settled bilaterally, had not been invited.

But Foreign department spokesman Raul Hernandez told reporters: &#8220;It will not happen this coming Dec. 12 ... because of [/B]scheduling problems. But the parties are working on&#8221; coming up with a new date.

He said he was unaware of any pressure being applied by Beijing to scuttle the Manila meeting.

The meeting of deputy foreign ministers had been part of Philippine efforts to push for a multilateral solution to the disputes.

China claims most of the sea including waters close to the shores of its neighbors.

Taiwan, like China, claims most of the sea, which includes some of the world's most important shipping lanes and is believed to be rich in fossil fuels.

Tensions have increased steadily over the past two years, with the Philippines and Vietnam accusing China of increasingly aggressive diplomatic tactics to stake its claims.

Relations between the Philippines and China have become particularly tense since patrol vessels by both countries engaged in a standoff over the Scarborough Shoal in April.

Philippines puts off 4-way South China Sea talks - The China Post
 
.
I oppose deleting posts unless some grossly abusive languages are employed ...

I don&#8217;t know how and when you can get rid of your crooked thinking, but one sure way is to educate yourself by reading more books from all sides.

China was composed of many independent states, too. So what!
Originally Posted by gpit

Ancient Vietnam was home to some of the world's earliest civilizations and societies - making them one of the world's first people who practiced agriculture.[2][3] The Red River valley formed a natural geographic and economic unit, bounded to the north and west by mountains and jungles, to the east by the sea and to the south by the Red River Delta. The need to have a single authority to prevent floods of the Red River, to cooperate in constructing hydraulic systems, trade exchange, and to fight invaders, led to the creation of the first Vietnamese states in 2879 BC.[4] The first truly influential part of history in Vietnam occurred during the Bronze Age, when the &#272;ông S&#417;n culture dramatically advanced the civilization. Vietnam's peculiar geography made it a difficult country to attack, which is why Vietnam under Hùng V&#432;&#417;ngwas for so long an independent and self-contained state. The Âns and Qins were among the earliest foreign aggressors of Vietnam, but the ancient Vietnamese managed to regain control of the country soon after the invasions.

In fact, lots of ancient Vietnamese ran away from Vietnamese brutality and worked for the Chinese, and made their historical achievement with their name in Hall of Fame. Your people &#26446;&#32705;&#20210; is such a person. Quote (&#22823;&#36234;&#21490;&#35352;&#20840;&#26360;/&#22806;&#32000;&#21367;&#20043;&#19968;): &#8220;&#31206;&#20341;&#20845;&#22283;&#65292;&#31281;&#30343;&#24093;&#12290;&#26178;&#25105;&#20132;&#36286;&#24904;&#24265;&#20154;&#26446;&#32705;&#20210;&#65292;&#36523;&#38263;&#20108;&#19976;&#19977;&#23610;&#12290;&#23569;&#26178;&#24448;&#37111;&#21543;&#20379;&#21147;&#24441;&#65292;&#28858;&#38263;&#23448;&#25152;&#31518;&#12290;&#36930;&#20837;&#20181;&#31206;&#65292;&#33267;&#21496;&#38583;&#26657;&#23561;&#12290;&#22987;&#30343;&#24471;&#22825;&#19979;&#65292;&#20351;&#23559;&#20853;&#23432;&#33256;&#27950;&#65292;&#32882;&#25391;&#21256;&#22900;&#65292;&#21450;&#32769;&#27512;&#30000;&#37324;&#21330;&#12290;&#22987;&#30343;&#20197;&#28858;&#30064;&#65292;&#37956;&#37509;&#28858;&#20687;&#65292;&#32622;&#21688;&#38525;&#21496;&#39340;&#38272;&#65292;&#33145;&#20013;&#23481;&#25976;&#21313;&#20154;&#65292;&#28659;&#25622;&#21205;&#20043;&#65292;&#21256;&#22900;&#20197;&#28858;&#29983;&#26657;&#23561;&#65292;&#19981;&#25954;&#29359; &#8220;https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/大越史記全書/外紀卷之一
Briefly: &#26446;&#32705;&#20210; was tall. He was beaten by (Vietnamese) official and ran into Qin and became an official, upto the rank of &#21496;&#38583;&#26657;&#23561;. Qin Emperor made him guard against Huns and scared the Huns till he retired to his farm and died there. Emperor thought it was extraordinary, and made a bronze status of him, with a few dozen people inside, shaking it. Huns though he was still alive, daring not invade.

Yes, a lot of Vietnamese went to China based on many reason. &#26446;&#32705;&#20210; , Lý Ông Tr&#7885;ng is one of them. I can say more, for exemple:
L&#432;u Ph&#432;&#417;ng í famous with his poet in Zhang An in China in acient time. Nguy&#7877;n An, who built Forbidden City in Peking in Ming Dynastry China, City was declared a World Heritage Site in 1987, and is listed by UNESCO as the largest collection of preserved ancient wooden structures in the world. or Nguy&#7877;n S&#417;n, he is the first foreigner promoted to rank General of PLA after 1949

While you are allowed to argue, but at least your famous historian &#40654;&#25991;&#20241; agreed that the Chinese Zhao Tuo (&#36249;&#20311;)was the first who established a country called Vietnam in today&#8217;s sense, implying that before that era, Vietnam were merely composed of stateless tribes. He thus said (quote) &#8220;&#36213;&#27494;&#24093;&#33021;&#24320;&#25299;&#25105;&#36234;&#65292;&#32780;&#33258;&#24093;&#20854;&#22269;&#65292;&#19982;&#27721;&#25239;&#34913;&#65292;&#20070;&#31216;&#32769;&#22827;&#65292;&#20026;&#25105;&#36234;&#20513;&#22987;&#24093;&#29579;&#20043;&#22522;&#19994;&#65292;&#20854;&#21151;&#21487;&#35859;&#22823;&#30691;&#12290;&#8221;( &#22823;&#36234;&#21490;&#35760;&#20840;&#20070;/&#22806;&#32426;&#21367;&#20043;&#20108;, https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/大越史記全書/外紀卷之二 ) briefly: Zhao Wu Di (Zhao Tuo) can establish my Vietnam, and self-enthrones in the state, balancing against Han Dynasty, starting the foundations of Vietnam Dynasties for us, the contribution is extraordinary.

Here we can derive two important conclusions: 1) before Zhao Tuo, Vietnam politically was composed of tribes fighting each other among themselves. None of them could call themselves Vietnam in today&#8217;s sense. A country called Vietnam in today&#8217;s sense was simply not there. 2) the country called Vietnam in today&#8217;s sense, politically and culturally, was established by a Chinese called Zhao Tuo as recognized by your Vietnamese, which could distinguish itself from northern Han Dynasty and defend itself against the northern.

&#40654;&#25991;&#20241;(Lê Van H&#432;u) hás been made mistaken when he comment about Tri&#7879;u Dynasty (207 &#8211; 111 BC) . Others Vietnamese historian critized it, until Ngô Thì S&#297; (&#21555;&#26178;&#22763;) has been corrected and Zhao Dynasty period was considered same the Hans, Tang ... was invaded and temporally controlled Vietnam.

before time of Zhao Da invaded in to Vietnam, there was existed our two emperor:
H&#7891;ng Bàng Period/Dynasty (2879 &#8211; 258 BC)
In Hong Bang period of Vietnam was ruled by Hung Vuong Emperors. Evidence of the earliest established society other than the Iron Age &#272;ông S&#417;n culture in Northern Vietnam was found in C&#7893; Loa, an ancient city situated near present-day Hà N&#7897;i.
Th&#7909;c Dynasty (257 &#8211; 207 BC)
Main articles: An D&#432;&#417;ng V&#432;&#417;ng and Co Loa Citadel
By the 3rd century BC, another Viet group, the Âu Vi&#7879;t, emigrated from present-day southern China to the Red River delta and mixed with the indigenous V&#259;n Lang population. In 258 BC, a new kingdom, Âu L&#7841;c, emerged as the union of the Âu Vi&#7879;t and the L&#7841;c Vi&#7879;t, with Th&#7909;c Phán proclaiming himself "An D&#432;&#417;ng V&#432;&#417;ng" ("King An D&#432;&#417;ng"). At his capital, C&#7893; Loa, he built many concentric walls around the city for defensive purposes. These walls, together with skilled Âu L&#7841;c archers, kept the capital safe from invaders. However, records showed that espionage resulted in the downfall of An D&#432;&#417;ng V&#432;&#417;ng when Zhao Da betrayed the peace aggreement .

The Chinese mentality seems very different from yours. They never say Mongolians are not ours and Manchurians are foreigners, very much like citizens in USA who never say Mexican or African Americans are not Americans. They consider all other racial components of the country as their same countryman.

You lies, same as Tibetans, Mongolians and Manchurian don't think so. I don't like to post here evidences.

In Vietnam, the Chinese were the major component being suppressed as Vietnam communists took over the power.

You lies, there was Soviet Union. Ho Chi Minh and his camrades were studied first in Moscow. I think after went Jien An red area of Communist China, Ho Chi Minh has known more about communism in China.
Not China, France colonial Govt pushed Vietnam to Communist state, when France govt denied proposal of Ho Chi Minh that Viet become indendence state in France Federation, but France belived that the can win in one month.
Dont forget that Ho Chinh released IndoChina Communist party and established Vietnam Democraty Part and Socialist Part in the same time from earlt years 1940s.

They want to purge Hoa (Chinese) ethnically because they foolishly believe Vietnam has to be ruled by Vietnamese race, similar to Hitler's idea. This is one of the reasons why your Vietnam today is still a sh!thole of economy

Why chinese don't accept that Japanese and Britain control China ?

Even today, in this forum, overwhelmingly larger amount of internet Vietnamese demonstrate their the kinds of thoughts via various posts, such as mocking Mongolian or Manchurian invasion of China.

We don&#8217;t like to insulting Chinese people about that, just to reminder Chinese netizens that in the past both Chinese and Vietnamese people were suffered demages in life and other violations when invaders invaded in to her country.

The deep misunderstanding lies in the difference between Chinese and Vietnamese mentalities shaped by geography and over the millenniums of history : 1) China geographically centers in Asia: people moving around Asia have a larger chance to come to China, whereas Vietnam sits in a corner of Indo-China peninsular, with much less temptation for land traveler which was much affordable in old times. Thus, the Chinese are broader minded than Vietnamese. 2) When the Mongolians and Manchurians invaded China, they did not think Chinese culture was inferior and needed to be wiped out or replaced (like British invasion of India or French/China invasion of Vietnam). Rather, those then semi-foreigners believed China&#8217;s culture was superior to their owns but the Chinese rulers needed to be replaced. And those invaders relentlessly adopted/enjoyed Chinese language/culture/tradition as their own. Unlike India or Vietnam situation, where mostly local languages were replaced or suppressed due to being considered less useful or inferior. For the 2nd aspect, please read Dr. Henry Kissinger&#8217;s book <On China>.

This is how Chinese culture and language has never been interrupted despite of so many invasions in the past, and nearly after every breaking up of the country, China reunified with even bigger territory: those &#8220;barbarians&#8221; loved to be civilized or sinicized.

You are still lying about yourself. Kissinger is a cheater, he can let chinese trink chinese tee with chemical sugar.
Friederich Engel said: Who rule someon else, he is the slaves.

In your guys pitiful thinking, as if bring up Manchurian flag would shame the Chinese, the fact is no Chinese cares as in Chinese internet, enormous amount of flags from various reasons can be viewed. Do you know the &#8220;Iron blood 13-star&#8221; flag? Do you know Qing navy dragon flag? (BTW, dragon is a typical sign of Chinese culture, but the Manchurian desperately attempted to claim to inherit . Pitifully and regrettably, not many Manchurian today can write their own backward writings. ) Do you know Chinese Soviet Central Government flag when Mao Ze Dong proposed those provinces should be independent from China? LOL! More importantly, do you know the history and meanings of those flags? Probably not, as you boys bring out those flags with a toddler&#8217;s mentality: pitiful and laughable.

The people in Tibet, Uijgur, Inner Mongolia, Manchuris don&#8217;t think so, it&#8217;s no need tp post here same picture about protesting there.

I think while I respect Vietnamese self-determination (to some destination of either prosperity or destitute), missing out Chinese boat is pretty pitiful and de-sinicization is lamentable as it will, if not handled properly, come with huge collateral damage deep to the root of your country.

And even funnier today: the friendship between Vietnam and China is considered unbelievable by some your internet Vietnamese!

Do your Vietnamese only believe in wars with China? If so, you must be crazy!

BTW, you are not losing to western capitalism, you are losing to your own by the fact that you don't make people live better and only think of war at the expense of their blood. If you keep your foolish ideology while keep people uneducated and poor, and, in your particular case, advocate war against China, you will eventually lose your country as many times happened in your history.

It reported in Vietnam that in forum in China today, Chinese govt let extremist loadly wow for war against Vietnam. It's double face of China govt.

Vietnamese don&#8217;t like to go to war with any country in the world. We have to protect and defende souvereignity of our country only
 
.
Originally Posted by gpit

Ancient Vietnam was home to some of the world's earliest civilizations and societies - making them one of the world's first people who practiced agriculture.[2][3] The Red River valley formed a natural geographic and economic unit, bounded to the north and west by mountains and jungles, to the east by the sea and to the south by the Red River Delta. The need to have a single authority to prevent floods of the Red River, to cooperate in constructing hydraulic systems, trade exchange, and to fight invaders, led to the creation of the first Vietnamese states in 2879 BC.[4] The first truly influential part of history in Vietnam occurred during the Bronze Age, when the &#272;ông S&#417;n culture dramatically advanced the civilization. Vietnam's peculiar geography made it a difficult country to attack, which is why Vietnam under Hùng V&#432;&#417;ngwas for so long an independent and self-contained state. The Âns and Qins were among the earliest foreign aggressors of Vietnam, but the ancient Vietnamese managed to regain control of the country soon after the invasions.

You people indeed belong to the Red River Delta, while the Chinese people belong to the Yellow River and Yangzi River.
 
.
More from Vietnamese Coast Guard :yahoo:

300px-Vietnam_Marine_Police_regions.jpg


vietnamese-marine-police-patrol-the-sea-617881-fishingboat03010w.jpg


9csb2005.jpg

200 tons Patrol Vessel

VNMarinePolice5.jpg

400 tons Patrol Vessel

attachment.php

2500 tons Patrol/Rescue Vessel
 
.
I don't quite understand something. What is the Chinese claim to Spratly Island?

I would understand the Chinese have stake in the paracel as they are close to Hainan Island. But to claim spratly island which is that further out to sea. what stake the claim?

I don't mean to agrue but i honeslt don't know.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom