What's new

South China Sea Forum

lol, seriously I find this NiceGuy has some cognitive dissonance, are you ok, my son?
U said that China will do some bad things if VN invade ur land, but why JP invaded ur land, raped ur families, then u dare not fight with them but keep begging them for some cheap Yen instead ??:pop:

:partay: money is not the issue, more rigs to follow :rofl:
No one bet on losing Horse. Even dumbest Chinese peasant also can not believe and keep wasting his Tax for Mr. Xi now :laugh:
 
U said that China will do some bad things if VN invade ur land, but why JP invaded ur land, raped ur families, then u dare not fight with them but keep begging them for some cheap Yen instead ??:pop:

China didn't claim post-WW2 compensation, but in return, Japan issued long-term debt with low interest to China. This is compensation in another form.
 
China didn't claim post-WW2 compensation, but in return, Japan issued long-term debt with low interest to China. This is compensation in another form.
Okay, then it means after invade China, rape and kill millions Chinese if a country (such as JP) have money to pay for u guys, then u guys will be happy to take the money, right ??:pop:
 
CCG 1307 or CCG 3308?

085245q83p3mwmzcowaaaw.jpg.thumb.jpg


HPS has turned itself into a sausage maker。:enjoy:
 
JP invaded ur land, rape ur gilrs etc. what u can do is keep begging JP for some cheap Yen in 1978 :pop:


Whatever. the World see ur huge forces in Paracel were humiliated by VN small forces again after 1979 war and had to withdraw unconditionally .

Seems like Mr Xi's position is in danger bcz of his incompetent in fighting with enemies to protect 'China sovereignty' now :pop:


Poor Chinese peasant wont accept their Tax will be waste again in SCS(east sea) :pop:

Considering the casualty and the damage inflicted, I think another "humiliation" is quite acceptable. Though in term of naval battles between Vietnam and China, I think the little skirmish at Johnson South Reef in 1988 is telling enough, don't you think?
 
Considering the casualty and the damage inflicted, I think another "humiliation" is quite acceptable. Though in term of naval battles between Vietnam and China, I think the little skirmish at Johnson South Reef in 1988 is telling enough, don't you think?
in 1988, we didnt have Naval forces and no marine police ship too. We didnt have anything but soldiers with AK-47 to protect the islands. If u think using warship to kill soldiers with AK-47 only is the great Naval battle victory, thern Ok, thats up to u guys, but we really didnt have warship that time, so no one think that skirmish can be called as Naval battle .

At least, we show to the world that No VN soldiers surrendered in 1988 even they didnt have anything to fight back ur warship.

Things changed now, we have Kilos, Gepard , patrol ship , and the whole world can see who just kick out who in the Oil rig conflict.
 
Last edited:
@cnleio : do you remember what I predict last month that "next month ( July ) China govt would go downstair ?
we all know that recent statement only for relaxing Chinese people purpose ...

Removal of the oil rig is the best choice for China benefit ...

I just was banned for no reason, by a Chinese moderator, I think. it's unfair compare to this dirty talking guy @CN Black or troll Jlaw.
H981 oil rig didn't find out any oil in that waterarea, sooner or later it will remove to another place. It's just a oil rig, can back or come.

If u mean H981 leaving == China govt go downstair, next time another China oil rig back it means China govt go upstair ? There'r different things, the truth is no oilfield in that waterarea.
 
H981 oil rig didn't find out any oil in that waterarea, sooner or later it will remove to another place. It's just a oil rig, can back or come.

If u mean H981 leaving == China govt go downstair, next time another China oil rig back it means China govt go upstair ? There'r different things, the truth is no oilfield in that waterarea.
Under our forces's under pressure, ur oil rig had to keep moving from here to there every day, it didnt have enough time to explore the area carefully, so how could u know that area dont have Oil ??
 
Under our forces's under pressure, ur oil rig had to keep moving from here to there every day, it didnt have enough time to explore the area carefully, so how could u know that area dont have Oil ??
Coz H981 oil rig drill the hole ... China didn't have only one oil rig like H981.
 
H981 oil rig didn't find out any oil in that waterarea, sooner or later it will remove to another place. It's just a oil rig, can back or come.

If u mean H981 leaving == China govt go downstair, next time another China oil rig back it means China govt go upstair ? There'r different things, the truth is no oilfield in that waterarea.
Yes, at the time we predict, we consider withdrawal all of Chinese ships is going downstair.
and absolute, we consider putting the oil rig into disputed area as raise tension ...

You think that some saying of Chinese as China shot some satellite photos to estimate the location of oil potential source are wrong?

We know that in advance, there's no oil at all.

Coz H981 oil rig drill the hole ... China didn't have only one oil rig like H981.

Do you know that Iran few month ago cancelled the several billion dollars value contract with CNPC , due to CNPC delayed in process requirements of drill few hundreds drill in the assigned oil block ? even 90 days after reminding time ?

Believe me, 981 never drill any hole ...

And yes, 981 is the only one of its kind ...
Next time, the similar oil rig of Vietnam would drill hundreds holes in deep sea water level
 
Last edited:
Believe me, 981 never drill any hole ...

And yes, 981 is the only one of its kind ...
Next time, the similar oil rig of Vietnam would drill hundreds holes in deep sea water level
981 oil rig can ...

2012081313055881414.jpg

2012-07-04-21-36-15-77.jpg
 
China play a trick, to drill the first in 9 May 2012 near Hongkong, not 9 May 2014 in Vietnam EEZ.
but as I tracked, they keep the posting of first drill 2012 up to front around the beginning of May 2014 as they start drill something in our EEZ ... But they lied.

Few days floating and move back 23 miles not enough for first drill

So the photos still show the first drill in 9 May
 
Last edited:
China play a trick, to drill the first in 9 May 2012 near Hongkong, not 9 May 2014
but as I tracked, they keep the posting of first drill 2012 up to front around the beginning of May 2014 as they start drill something
But move back 23 miles right after few days.

So the photos still show the first drill in 9 May
Bro, i just tell u the Chinese built large oil rig and export them.
H981 is just the one of oil rigs which China govnt can deploy in SCS.
123090814_131n.jpg

20101029112828288.jpg

rdn_4f5eadf4643b5.jpg

100227134676196163854643c5.jpg

201110082222146111.jpg

Img398331721.jpg
 
Last edited:
China's 1st deep-water rig to begin operations in sea area

China's first deep-water drilling rig CNOOC 981 started operations in the South China Sea at 9: 38 a.m. on Wednesday, marking "a substantial step" made by the country's deep-sea oil industry. The sixth-generation semi-submersible CNOOC 981 began drilling in a sea area 320 km southeast of Hong Kong at a water depth of 1,500 meters, according to China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC), the country's largest offshore oil producer.

131576968_11n.jpg


Crew members of deep-water drilling rig CNOOC 981 gather to watch a drill bit go down to explore in the South China Sea, south China, May 9, 2012. (Xinhua/Jin Liangkuai)

cnleio : good luck, but our specialists know that 981 still a semi imported oil rig
 
Back
Top Bottom