What's new

Solution for Indian occupied Kashmir ? Liberation.

.
.
By the way you guys say that 3 Gods or lords created whole universe..Whats up with that philosphy?? Or it is just to make people idiot?! :coffee:


Its akin to the belief that if a person says As-salāmu ʿalaykum, the prophet in his infinite wisdom hailed that person as a Mussalman.

Its nothing other than a belief in the god being ever encompassing and all embracing. The hindu philosophy is based on same principle as Koran, only one true god being there.

When you say so many gods .. they are actually trying to accept the views for the limited knowledge and wisdom of the human race.

Like Kaba, its a symbol of the prophet's struggle. The human is too weak and ignorant to be able to accept the one true god being everywhere. The inherent flaw of a human wants the human to symbolise god somehow, to re-assure self in face of challenges and situations that are meant to test the faithful.

Cheers.
 
.
Solution.
Start calling it Balochistan from now on and you will find all of India calling for independence of Balochistan...
 
.
You have tried all four options and failed. First 3 are ongoing. The fourth was tried decades ago. You are welcome to try it again
Didn't failed. Liberated half of the Kashmir in 1948.....
 
. .
What do you mean "Depends"? India has a clear policy

In April 2013 Shyam Saran, convener of the National Security Advisory Board, affirmed that regardless of the size of a nuclear attack against India, be it a tactical nuclear weapon or a strategic nuclear weapon, India will retaliate massively.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...tion-india-warns-pak/articleshow/19795988.cms

Let me give you one small example.

A 1 Kt yield device on say their favorite weapon Nasr, will give a yield of frontage about 1-1.5 kms maximum. That wont affect even half a squadron of Tanks. That means, not even 6 to 7 tanks.

So if a deployment takes place in desert where there is no fallout on nearby city/towns, India may not retaliate then if the situation favors India tactically.

The strike by any side will be undertaken only to exploit a result. It will not be undertaken to prevent a result, as once a strike is carried out, the situation moves out of domain of tactical considerations to strategic employability by the opposing force.

This is purely on a tactical level.

Its a big topic. You can start it again .. when you want. Tag in .. will discuss.
 
.
only one solution.....accept LOC as permanent international border. Pakistan must stop supporting terrorism and Open border for Kashmiri people with fewer security check. Kashmiri should allow to go any where in Indian Kashmir and PAk Kashmir. for rest state, they should not have permit
 
.
Like always, Nuke War has also started in the thread. :wave:
 
.
We obviously have them if they're deployed and everyone is crying about it.
No one is crying about them it is just because your countrymen have no other thing to say and tactical nuke come as "Response to Everything in Universe" we have to reply.

PS:I personally think people here who advocate war,nukes or something like that have no real experience of any critical situations. They will be first to run away from these situations.
 
. .
Don't be so immature about things.
You are being Immature

If you say that Pakistan Has Nuclear weapon of 25-30 KT yield I believe you
Because you Practically tested Nuclear Warhead Device in 1998 tests

But Tactical Nukes are Hardest Part of the Nuclear Design Creation after RV's Without field test And Recorded Simulations of Active test you cannot Validate Authenticity of Warhead Designs And its operations

Russians,United states,Chinese Even India Tested Tactical nukes

Why Pakistan is Exception
 
.
It sad to see so many negative tv news from Indian occupied Kashmir, where we see indian occupation forces torture, kill & rape innocent Kashmiri with worst kind of brute force. Hundreds of Kashmiri have made blind by Indian armies use of pellet guns and other weapons.

Kashmiri people don’t have food, medicines, television, internet, newspapers. India is aiming to break Kashmiris contact with the outside world. No foreign journalist or media personnel is permitted to visit Indian occupied Kashmir. Neither is UN permitted to visit Kashmir.

My question to fellow debaters from Pakistan in this forum is, where goes Pakistan's red line. Should Pakistan stand still and watch India slaughter the entire population of Kashmir as it have done since 1947 ?

Had Pakistan tolerated so much brutality if India had attacked Punjab, Sindh, Baluchistan, KP or Azad Kashmir (Pakistani-controlled Kashmir) and driven mass slaughter of Pakistanis?

I want feedback from Pakistani debaters, what their perception on this issue is?
Sir here is a simple answer and is quran not the book of guidance Chapter 4 verse 75-76 {What has happened to you that you do not fight in the way of Allah, and for the oppressed among men, women and children who say, “Our Lord, take us out from this town whose people are cruel, and make for us a supporter from Your own, and make for us a helper from Your own.” (75) The believers fight in the way of Allah, and the disbelievers fight in the way of Taghut. So, fight the friends of Satan. No doubt, the guile of Satan is feeble. (76)

You cannot do talks with a firoun because he thinks he is too powerful. If in such type of cases dialogue was the solution then i feel that Allah Almighty messengers were on of the best person who were given the ability to dialogue in an effective manner but as we come to know from The Quran that Firoun did not listen to prophet Moses (peace be upon him) and did not let go bani israel and followed them with his forces till his death. Do you think India will listen to us? Do you think the west would like to help us? I really like what Turkish president said. You should watch it too
 
.
You are being Immature

If you say that Pakistan Has Nuclear weapon of 25-30 KT yield I believe you
Because you Practically tested Nuclear Warhead Device in 1998 tests

But Tactical Nukes are Hardest Part of the Nuclear Design Creation after RV's Without field test And Recorded Simulations of Active test you cannot Validate Authenticity of Warhead Designs And its operations

Russians,United states,Chinese Even India Tested Tactical nukes

Why Pakistan is Exception

If we don't have them then why is India and the US crying about our tactical nuke capability? And why are the systems deployed?

No one is crying about them it is just because your countrymen have no other thing to say and tactical nuke come as "Response to Everything in Universe" we have to reply.

PS:I personally think people here who advocate war,nukes or something like that have no real experience of any critical situations. They will be first to run away from these situations.

Saying we will use nukes as a response makes sure your crazy country doesn't try to invade us, it worked in 1999, 2002, and 2008.
 
.
If we don't have them then why is India and the US crying about our tactical nuke capability? And why are the systems deployed?
Which Army or Govt Official Actually Made statement about your tactical Nukes in india or in the US May i know

Now Don't start giving Blogs and Articles or gossip Written by Media
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom