CriticalThought
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2016
- Messages
- 7,094
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
I will confine my answer to your first paragraph. You are absolutely right in that the IAF will pull back its force barring a token one from its FOBs and fight from behind. It will be the most sensible strategy as most FOBs with in a couple of hundred miles will be gone in 24 hours due to long range stand off weapons. However it does put PAF at a disadvantage as well. Being held back means more time to reach station to engave enemy allowing yime for them to straff close to the border areas and return. How does one counter this? You can have planes take off with a 4+2 configuration plaus a central tank and half feul refuel in air and loiter on patrol. You cannot have ARPs anywhere near the war zone as they will need protecting as will your AWACs. With good coordination the leader holds back and directs planes towards bogeys with secure radio and radars off.
Enemy enters aCombo of 16s and JFT encounters. 5he 16s use their EW Suite to take care of the enemy jwmmers and JFTs let off their arsenal and immediately return to base. The second wave is ready and in air to approach the area in 2-3 minutes to take care of any stragglers. So attrition ratez may be higher on the enemy side. The enemy may also institute countermeasures, however I doubt one will remain in the arena once the missiles are let loose. So the advantage may be for the SUs to ready themselves into positions to counter the onslaught and take on fighters as they enter the arena. They will will not have that time depending on how muchctime PAF takes to get the sefond wave of fighters. If it comes on before the SUs recover from the original onslaught then IAF will have no option but to return to base and look for another opportunity. Attrition on both sides depends on who firse first when they fire ie in the missile's kill zone or on the periphery, what the robustness of the missile is against countermeasures and experience of the pilots. Isuspect there may b3 wome attrition on the offensive side depending on how quickly they can spot the attackers and this is where the game will lie. If they cannot then it will be high attrition especially if the missiles function to their full capability. For the defenders the real game is not to be spotted . If they fail in this they will become vulnerable.
My own assessment therefors feel free to shred it to bits. It is after all just my opinion.
Regards.
A
But why fight at all. Little brother life is too short to be fighting all the time. If you disagree with him explain cooly why you disgree and if he still persists in hos view point agree to disagree and move on. I spend most of my time on this forum dissipating fights. why????.Lets be friends here and move on please.
Kind regards
A
Sir, our FOBs will be at the mercy of Indian SRBMs, and land launched Brahmos. Before they bring in the SU-30s, they will soften us up with simply missiles. Now Pak forces may draw the line at this and go nuclear if their bombardment causes such significant damage. But today, we are surrounded on both East and West. There is a good chance that Indian armored thrust will be accompanied by sorties from the West. This is a VERY real concern and a scenario that must keep.our leaders awake at night.