Based on what?
Unofficial surveys?
I have not heard or seen a complete list of name and address of civilians killed in a strike.
Not from Talib@stards (even when they would love to show this).
Not from Pak army (perhaps they want to hide the fact)
Not from Pak government (they can protest so I am sure they have names and addresses)
Not from Imran Khan (he can print one and put on the website)
Surely Imran can get the list. His full name happens to be Taliban Khan (j/k).
The only people on that list that want to and could compile a detailed list of names and locations of civilian casualties would be the taliban. The taliban propaganda is not that sophisticated, even if they had the chance, which I'm sure they did, they wouldn't attempt to fill a detailed report.
The conservative estimates are unreliable and those higher estimates by foreign media may also be unreliable due to the fact that none of those parties have access to the area. But still, even if we take the median values of those estimates, they should provide reasonably sound estimates as to the actual figure, which to me seems too high.
And when you put those estimates in context, they don't raise any eyebrows here. That is so because the US fails to recognize possible civilian casualties, no-one claims any responsibility for the death of any civilians. We treat them like aliens of no nationality, that aren't bound by international law to receive basic human rights.
So you see, the numbers and fitgures so far are from the leftist and Talibnaist webistes, but without much to support it.
True. But again, even if I take right-wing republican sources estimates from the US, who are ever so conservative with their estimates. Their's are unreliable too, and theirs also show a significant amount of civilian deaths.
While we cry about drone deaths,
where is our anger for the 50,000 Pakistanis civilians killed.
We do get their names from the newspapers. So we have a way to authenticate the numbers.
I agree with you.
My countrymen have suffered a great deal, it pains me, but for that we can't justify the possible death of other civilians.
there should be no acceptable ratio of civilian deaths to taliban taken down.
Besides, as for that 50,000... drones and their use fester support from within our own tribal areas.
Unlike before, the TTP are no longer just foreign elements, they have people from our lands among their ranks.
Obviously there are more pressing issues then just drones as to why that has happened, but I'm sure it's a contributory factor.
Isn't it time to have some sense of love for those who get killed and bombed and raped by the Talib@stards?
Or you think Talb\@stards have immunity in our analysis, just because they have promised to bring to us pagans the darkness of Islamism.
Please think about it.
I can see your argument. Believe it or not, I supported their use in FATA.
However, upon learning the attitudes of the US, upon seeing reports of civilian deaths and after 4-5 years of non stop use and little result (unless combined by ground op and effort). I no longer think it's the right way to go about this business.
Even the US has realized that this is a battle of hearts and minds. Winning over tribals is just as important as other objectives.