RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
i think that's a redundant statement
I don't think so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i think that's a redundant statement
i think that's a redundant statement
Wasnt Jernail singh a former indian army man?who had fought against Pakistan aswell? why did he pick up weapons in the first place... no pun...just askin
well "India" was only unified under the Mughals and the British...before that the "Indians" had several kingdoms, and "India" was quite divided between the different ethnicities (eg. the "Aryans" in the north and Dravidians the south) and different language speakers. The only thing common between all the different communities was the common religion. Btw did you know it was thanks to the greeks and the arabs that the subcontinent is known as "India/Indian"?
India was united under Ashoka,far before the name mughals entered history books.
Strictly speaking India was not unified under mughals.Mughals controlled only northern part of India.They never controlled deccan and ahom(assam) except for brief period of time.Deccan for 12 years(1687-99) and ahom for 5 years(1633-77).
So unless one is taking in cognisense only mainland India was never united completely.For mainland it was united under ashoka for 52 years and under aurengzeb for 12 years.
Aryan and Dravidian is cluster of races and languages not kingdoms.
India is known as India because of Greeks.This is well established in megasthenes book "Indica".Greeks gave the name Indus to Sindhu river as it formed boundary of India.India was known as bharata to local Inhabitants.
India was united under Ashoka,
Lmao. Everything you have written is negated by this.
You conveniently forget the part where i differentiated between mainland india and India 2012.
I hope you're not talking about IVC which is in Pakistan, Bharati.
You should increase your knowledge about history.compare to 12 settlements in pakistan india has 24.
Please explain for a simple minded person as myself.
Haha. But you have to measure the significance of these sites compared to the ones from Pakistan, and if they were or not rooted from the original sites from Pakistan.
Ashoka (He kingdom extended to today's Iraq)
Lothal in gujrat was only harbour via which trading with mesopotamia and egyptian civilisation.
LOL. It barely reached today's Iran. What are you making these baseless claims for?
---------- Post added at 10:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 PM ----------
Trade by sea was a new and important concept, however trade by land was more of a defining factor in those times.
New Recruit