What's new

Should Sharia be Established in Bangladesh?

.
If you are happy with English Common Law then you shouldn't complain. If "justice is to be humane and reforming" and "punishment to be deterrence", then we need to go back to Sharia. All of SA, not just BD.

If you guys want Sharia, then go ahead. But please don't drag India into this. We are a completely separate entity from you guys, and have nothing in common with you. What India has currently is best for us, if you guys feel your nation could benefit from Sharia then go ahead, but keep all that retardedness away from us...
 
. .
Last time it was enforced but this time it will be a popular choice... Going forward within a century things will look more rosy for sure. ;)

The Mughals are dead and buried and considering the position that Central Asia and Afghanistan or for that matter Mongolia is don't think they will resurrect themselves in the next few hundred years, and we will make sure it remains that way.
The closest you will get to Shariah in the SA will be in Pakistan and Maldives if the radicals take over as they claim. And, Sri Lanka, Nepal and India will wipe out the left overs of the Mughals and the radicals if they even venture out to mess with our way of life.

Just by having more children will not ensure automatic power, without any other strengths. Pushing secular nations with their radical ideologies will give reason to retaliate and will put scores of Muslims lives in danger.
 
.
It says Muslim already 25%. How correct is that? Or just bullsshit?

Its probably false. According to 2008 census Indian Muslims are at half of that, at 13.4%. Its a delusional blog for the most part, but yes he is right that Muslims in general need to make less quantity and more quality. Not most Muslims think this way, but especially the Jamaati/Ummah kind, that think they are going to dominate the world by breeding more, but their kids are absolutely useless in terms of contributing to mankind. No offence, just my point of view...
 
.
Its probably false. According to 2008 census Indian Muslims are at half of that, at 13.4%. Its a delusional blog for the most part, but yes he is right that Muslims in general need to make less quantity and more quality. Not most Muslims think this way, but especially the Jamaati/Ummah kind, that think they are going to dominate the world by breeding more, but their kids are absolutely useless in terms of contributing to mankind. No offence, just my point of view...


"Quantity itself is a Quality" - Joseph Stalin

Muslim population needs to be at least 35-40% to have a voice in India. Once they are a mass then they can claim bigger share of the goodies that Hindus are enjoying now.

Its probably false. According to 2008 census Indian Muslims are at half of that, at 13.4%. Its a delusional blog for the most part, but yes he is right that Muslims in general need to make less quantity and more quality. Not most Muslims think this way, but especially the Jamaati/Ummah kind, that think they are going to dominate the world by breeding more, but their kids are absolutely useless in terms of contributing to mankind. No offence, just my point of view...

They are marginalized due to lesser numbers. Muslims are not seen as other minorities due to inherent jealousy and fear from Majority hindus.
 
.
Its probably false. According to 2008 census Indian Muslims are at half of that, at 13.4%. Its a delusional blog for the most part, but yes he is right that Muslims in general need to make less quantity and more quality. Not most Muslims think this way, but especially the Jamaati/Ummah kind, that think they are going to dominate the world by breeding more, but their kids are absolutely useless in terms of contributing to mankind. No offence, just my point of view...

yes you are right despite being largest amoung minority group they stand last in their contribution towards developing the nation compared to other minorities who constitute just a fraction of population on the other hand uneducated and radicalized idiots from their group have been creating more problems for the society
 
.
"Quantity itself is a Quality" - Joseph Stalin

Muslim population needs to be at least 35-40% to have a voice in India. Once they are a mass then they can claim bigger share of the goodies that Hindus are enjoying now.



They are marginalized due to lesser numbers. Muslims are not seen as other minorities due to inherent jealousy and fear from Majority hindus.

We can take care of our mess and we will ;), can we stay on topic and that is Sharia in Bangladesh - we would love to see it in Bangladesh.
 
.
"Quantity itself is a Quality" - Joseph Stalin

Muslim population needs to be at least 35-40% to have a voice in India. Once they are a mass then they can claim bigger share of the goodies that Hindus are enjoying now.

They are marginalized due to lesser numbers. Muslims are not seen as other minorities due to inherent jealousy and fear from Majority hindus.

I think context is important for Stalin's quote. He was talking about weapons in warfare. Depends on how you view Muslims, is the ultimate aim of Muslims to lead peaceful successful lives? Or as you suggested by giving the Stalin quote, is the purpose of Muslims to be used as some sort of weapons against non-Muslims? Because what we are seeing with every passing day is an increasingly polarized world which is turning into Muslim vs non-Muslim, and in many ways you guys only have yourself to blame. You guys (Muslims) cry about how the whole world seems to be against you, but can you really blame us when you guys give us the feeling that you are something we should be worried about?

As for the numbers - not really. Parsis make about 70,000 of the Indian population(0.007%), but are probably the most successful community of any community in India. Sikhs are another community, who despite being 3% of the population are ridiculously successful , taking posts from being the Prime Minister to Chief of Armed Forces of India. Even other minorities like Buddhists and Jains are probably better off than Hindus.

With Muslims, the there have been Aziz Premjis (richest Muslim businessman in the World), but not enough, and at the end of the day they only have themselves to blame I feel.
 
.
when muslims will become absolute majority in india & india will be declared islamic country, if we r not checking it now!!! | Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam

Fun read. Comments by indians. Take notice- no Bangladeshi there to troll, They are doing it themselves without any provocation. Here they have an excuse of trolling - answering Bangladeshi troll. It is actually in their blood, their nature!

Now should I post some obscure jamati blog and claim bigotry is in bangladeshi blood?
 
.
Originally posted by jobless jack, since the thread is closed so replying here:

we will throw away the filled glass and give you guys new ones

Maybe it will work for someone who believes in religious mumbo jumbo because it's easier for him to switch over to some other form of mumbo jumbo. For me the glass is full of rationality and scepticism, not compatible with kind of water you are trying to pour into.
 
. .
I didnt know that, i was actually told by my Hindu friend if he drinks, he will be a swine in his next life!! My knowledge is limited cause i never tried to read about hinduism!! But if that is true, how its compatible with atheism???

I'm not authority of Hinduism myself, however there has always been atheistic(Nastik) branch of Hinduism. Buddhism for an example is an atheistic religion since it doesn't believe in higher being(both Buddhism and Hinduism believe in Karma, however in Vedic Hinduism a higher being bestows the Karma on you regardless of your deeds and in Buddhism your deed gains you Karma).

Then there is Advaita and Dwaita phylosophy. Adi Sankaracharya, for example, considered idol worshiping as needless but harmless exercise.
 
. .
Muhammad (saw) was a Prophet before he became a ruler. He spread the message of Islam as a Prophet. But, after his win over the infidels of Mecca, he became also a RULER of his country where he enforced peace by introducing laws that he found suitable in his time and for that particular society of Arabia.

But, during this period he carried out two functions, one as a Prophet and the other as a Ruler. As a Ruler he enacted a few severe punishments for his subjects.

But, how can these severe laws be universal and eternal? Every ruler enacts laws that he finds suitable for his countrty. So did Muhammad (saw) in his time. All the subsequent rulers in Arabia and in all the muslim countries of the past, the rulers enacted their own laws, not necessarily these were Sharia laws.

Laws always evolve and laws enacted by one Muslim monarch in old days were certainly not compatible with laws of other Muslim countries. It is same also today. The rulers (Parliament/govt) of one Muslim country enacts one set of laws that may be quite different from the laws of other Muslim countries.

So, Sharia common laws must not be introduced in BD because these are certainly not eternal. BD already has been bestowed with British laws that are not based on Christianity. We better leave the laws as they are now and also try to improve on these SECULAR laws.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom