What's new

Shawal Valley: The last frontier in Zarb - e - Azab!

. .
Work on the political and security operations on both sides of the border so the need to seal it is not there to the same extent.


So you prefer a solution that Pakistan tried in 50s and failed to a solution that has never been tried by Pakistan

Why can't we make a border like that of Korea?
Good luck finding sane voices in Afghanistan
Khar ba maij na si
Afghan ba insan na si
 
.
So you prefer a solution that Pakistan tried in 50s and failed to a solution that has never been tried by Pakistan

Why can't we make a border like that of Korea?
Good luck finding sane voices in Afghanistan
Khar ba maij na si
Afghan ba insan na si

Uncle Sam and the South Korean economy pay for the border that you want to emulate. What Pakistan tried in the 50s has no bearing on the new world today. If Pakistan cannot work with Afghanistan, it has two fronts to watch out for, which would not be very feasible in the long run. Something has to give.
 
.
Uncle Sam and the South Korean economy pay for the border that you want to emulate. What Pakistan tried in the 50s has no bearing on the new world today. If Pakistan cannot work with Afghanistan, it has two fronts to watch out for, which would not be very feasible in the long run. Something has to give.

It is not just Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a way, anyone can come through it you know. So border has to been seen on permanent basis.

We can make a higher body like a new corps to see border matters, name it border corps.
 
.
It is not just Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a way, anyone can come through it you know. So border has to been seen on permanent basis.

We can make a higher body like a new corps to see border matters, name it border corps.

Sure, raise another Corps. How much would that cost to train, equip and deploy permanently?
 
.
Sure, raise another Corps. How much would that cost to train, equip and deploy permanently?

Good point.

"Working with Afghanistan" is a loaded term and it needs both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Afghanistanis too have to accept that they need to have long term view of Pakistan as a partner.

they cannot and should not Moodi-fy (or Narindra-fy) our relationship that one attack somewhere in Kabul means suspension of talks.

That's stupider nay stupidest.
 
.
Uncle Sam and the South Korean economy pay for the border that you want to emulate. What Pakistan tried in the 50s has no bearing on the new world today. If Pakistan cannot work with Afghanistan, it has two fronts to watch out for, which would not be very feasible in the long run. Something has to give.

So our economy can afford loc and Indian border but not security on Durand? Wow what logic you have.
And its more feasible to build security infrastructure on Durand than having bomb blasts in kpk and rest of Pakistan bcz that hurts even more as it directly destroys civilian infrastructure and economy. And if South Korean didn't had that border do you really think they would have the economy they have today?
 
.
So our economy can afford loc and Indian border but not security on Durand? Wow what logic you have.
And its more feasible to build security infrastructure on Durand than having bomb blasts in kpk and rest of Pakistan bcz that hurts even more as it directly destroys civilian infrastructure and economy. And if South Korean didn't had that border do you really think they would have the economy they have today?

Yaara

That is being done too.

difference on LOC is that local Kashmiris do not go crazy when Pak army deploys 10s of 1000s of soldiers there.

FATA on the hand was different. However the change in attitudes is comiing

And yes Pakistan army / FC will now be permanently deployed there. New Cantonments are on the card all along Pak-Af border.

Still the locals have to respect this border from both sides and not raise hue and cry if they are asked to have ID papers and cross the border only on the designated points.
 
. .
If Pakistan cannot work with Afghanistan, it has two fronts to watch out for, which would not be very feasible in the long run. Something has to give.
Pakistan and Afghanistan needs to work together BUT:
You cannot always get what you desire.Pakistan And Afghanistan can never work together even when highly needed. Thats what I think...
 
.
Good point.

"Working with Afghanistan" is a loaded term and it needs both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Afghanistanis too have to accept that they need to have long term view of Pakistan as a partner.

they cannot and should not Moodi-fy (or Narindra-fy) our relationship that one attack somewhere in Kabul means suspension of talks.

That's stupider nay stupidest.

We have to work with the neighbors we have, not the neighbors we wish we had. Besides, Afghans will pursue their own international relationships as they see fit, including with India. Pakistan's sulking won't mean much to them, or to anyone else, for that matter. What will matter is how well Pakistanis are able to convince the Afghan how their interests coincide and what can be mutually beneficial as they explore other options.

So our economy can afford loc and Indian border but not security on Durand? Wow what logic you have.
And its more feasible to build security infrastructure on Durand than having bomb blasts in kpk and rest of Pakistan bcz that hurts even more as it directly destroys civilian infrastructure and economy. And if South Korean didn't had that border do you really think they would have the economy they have today?

It is not my logic, but the economy that will determine what Pakistan can afford or not, and in what order of priorities. South Korea was protected by Uncle Sam as they worked hard to get their economy off the ground. Pakistan had the same chance in th 50s and 60s and we blew it. Now it is a different world altogether geopolitically.

Yaara

That is being done too.

difference on LOC is that local Kashmiris do not go crazy when Pak army deploys 10s of 1000s of soldiers there.

FATA on the hand was different. However the change in attitudes is comiing

And yes Pakistan army / FC will now be permanently deployed there. New Cantonments are on the card all along Pak-Af border.

Still the locals have to respect this border from both sides and not raise hue and cry if they are asked to have ID papers and cross the border only on the designated points.

Getting rid of the miscreants is only the start. Extending the writ of the government and incorporating the tribal areas under the same legal and administrative cover would be the next steps, and it is not assured that they would be forthcoming anytime soon.

Then it isn't just security, there is smuggling, drugs etc. etc.

One key give multiple solutions.

Are you sure that the will to stop smuggling and drug trade is there? The multiple billions generated go a lot way in buying influence going up to the highest corridors of power in Pakistan.

Pakistan and Afghanistan needs to work together BUT:
You cannot always get what you desire.Pakistan And Afghanistan can never work together even when highly needed. Thats what I think...

Never say never in international geopolitics.
 
.
Pakistan needs to finish Zarb-e-azab than do one of the following:

1. Electrical fence, or
2. Five mile buffer filled with mines

This way Afghanistan can stop accusing us of sending people to their side for attacks and vice versa.

Will this happen? No. It makes too much sense.
 
.
Never say never in international geopolitics.
one-does-not-simply-never-say-never.jpg
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom