Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't want me to be referred with any caste so I never told you.why dont u tell me us caste,since u refer to mine.
Shameful that someone can cut a person's arm in India and still roam free.
Wtf is police doing ?
I don't want me to be referred with any caste so I never told you.
Anyways I don't have any specific caste because my mom is telugu and dad is tamil..I just mention as General..thats all
What are you talking about? Those brave men were protecting the interests of their persecuted religion. These Hindus will always play the victim card.
Oh wait, the professor is a christian?
What he went through before, and is going through right now, must've been horrific. But why, of all passages, did he have to choose this passage for setting a question? The question was about punctuating the passage. Couldn't he have chosen a less controversial passage? It reportedly goes like this:
Muhammad: Creator! Creator!
God: What is it, you son of a bitch?
Muhammad: A mackerel, if cut, would be how many pieces?
God: How many times have I told you that there would be three pieces, you dog?
Would the Hindu or Christian groups be any less hostile were he to target these religions in Kerala? I know not.
You are truly a SICKULAR.....
Kindly provide proof of your fantastic claims .... a link will do just fine.
BTW here is the real truth ...
"The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thodupuzha, on Wednesday acquitted Prof T.J.Joseph, former head of the Malayalam Department of Newman College, Thodupuzha, in connection with a controversial question paper he had prepared for an internal exam of Degree students......
........He said the question paper was prepared based on a book written by P.T.Kunju Muhammed. .......
Kerala professor acquitted in question paper case - The Hindu
Then you must adhere to principle "All castes are equal" and stop judging people based on caste.dont refer to me also by my caste.
What happened to your strawman demolition skills? Creating your own to practice them?
There's plenty of hate speech and texts to be found in literature. But they don't warrant a place in Examination Question Papers. What if someone put the quotes of Akbaruddin Owaisi's speech for translation or punctuation in an Examination paper? Is that all fine too?
Stop acting like a retard man. What he had to undergo was wrong. But I'd like to hear your reactions if he had cited Owaisi's speeches as Examination material.
what you don't understand YET is you are brainwashed by Sangh. the plain truth is, you want to kill all Muslims and Christians to satisfy your God Golwarkar&Hedgewar. you are as intolerant as a Taliban mofo. I recommend you keep away from Sangh. it is affecting your brain.
Ban on RSS and it's brainwashing is very much needed.India's existance is getting questioned because of robots churned out from Nagpur militants(RSS).
I am still waiting for a link that provides evidence of your fantastic claims. You are now seeing my "not allow to deflect skill".
Once you provide the proof we can then ALSO discuss Owaisi speech.
The court has accepted there was no Malefied intent ..... hate speeches do not get that kind favorable response from the courts.
Then you must adhere to principle "All castes are equal" and stop judging people based on caste.
What link are you searching for? About what was published in the Examination? It was already provided by another member. Anyways, here it is: Assault on T. J. Joseph - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And here's another article which describes that he essentially reproduced the text from another source, but replaced the name of the protagonist as Muhammad.
Controversial question paper: Lecturers hand chopped off - Indian Express
LOL....Thank you for posting that. Now here is the real point,
1. The extract was from a University approved Book.
2. The book was part of the Syllabus
NOW here is the truly SECULAR PART,
In the University approved Book the protagonist is a HINDU named Murali and he is talking to the Hindu God ....and the conversation is EXACTLY as you have posted.
HOWEVER the Book itself is written by a MUSLIM Mr. Kunju Muhammed
....SO far it is SECULAR ...and all is well with the world.
Now the Prof. Joseph removes the Hindu protagonist and replaces him with the author of the book, Muhammed and thus converts in into a conversation between Muhammed and Allah
Suddenly this is NOT SECULAR .....and the prof. Hands get chopped off.
And therein lies the story NO ONE want to talk about. Get it Mr. Sickular ?
Thanks for the Gyan, but also produce links to support your statements. A link that statesthat the book which he cited was on the list of approved publications would be good.
Now, regarding why it was controversial before. Nobody bothers with a name like Murali because it's a name for one of our Gods itself, and we don't have prophets in Hinduism by that name. Is it the same case with a Muhammad?
Now, regarding the name change. Do you think nobody would protest if he introduced that passage, but changed the name as Shirdi Sai Baba or Ramakrishna Paramahamsa or Swami Vivekananda? I'm certain that such a naming would indeed raise protests from a few sections of our society. Would they be just as brutal? I know not. You're the Kerala expert, and you take a call on that.
Besides, isn't it obvious that University-approved syllabus also needs to be cited faithfully? Tampering with them wasn't necessary at all. Perhaps the Good Professor can answer why he chose Muhammad over a Jesus or Paramahamsa.