What is sad or shameful?
We never invited them into our country and had both they and the British never stepped on our soil we would have been far better off.
As per the book "Contours of the World Economy 1-2030 AD" by Angus Maddison during the 115 years of British colonialism/occupation of our territory with the help of those
filthy Indian niggers our GDP (PPP) per capita grew a measly 60% while Britain's grew 700% in the same time frame. However, following the end of their occupation in 1947 our GDP (PPP) per capita grew 300% in 30 years (i.e. we experienced five times the grown in about a quarter of the time). Furthermore, as per a 1996 paper titled "Did Colonization Matter for Growth" by Prof. Graziella Bertocchi and Prof. Fabio Canova of the Universities of Modena and Pompeu Fabra they found those countries who remained free from colonization did better economically, the effects of colonization (though with reference specifically to Africa where their study took place) were largely negative, and just like in the case with India and Pakistan the moment colonialism/occupation ended their economies accelerated forward.
Henry Mayers Hyndman wrote a paper titled "Colonies and Dependencies" for the International Socialist Congress held in Amsterdam on 1904 and in his introduction he states:
"With respect to India, the situation is even more deplorable. By our shameful rule in that magnificent territory, we are not only starving millions of the most industrious and long-suffering people in the world to death; but, in this case also, by the thirty millions sterling which our dominant classes yearly take from India without commercial return to fill their own pockets, the inhabitants of these islands are permitting wealth to be piled up against them, which, if left in India, would, even under the conditions of to-day, provide them with prosperous customers. British ruin of India is at any rate the greatest crime which has ever blackened the annals of the human race. It is high time that the for the horrors of the deliberately-manufactured famines should be brought home to the apathetic and ignorant voters who allow this systematic bleeding to death to go on."
Those Jews were nothing more than instruments of the occupation. It is interesting how the article itself states that almost all of them left Pakistan once it was free in 1947 to assist in the occupation of Palestine.
In Canada churches are closing down all the time because there simply aren't enough people attending them to warrant their upkeep so it's not surprising that a synagogue in Pakistan would be demolished and turned into a shopping mall as there wouldn't have been enough people to keep it operational.
Pakistan's law and order problem stems from a lack of sufficient funding for the police (the result of a lack of sufficient tax collection which itself is the byproduct of corruption and ineptitude) and just as importantly a total lack of respect for a government whose legal system is still based on colonial era laws, which communicates in English instead of it's own tongue like Urdu, and which sells out it's own people and nation.
