What's new

Saudi army chief replaced on Raheel Sharif’s recommendation: report

Pale white Western irreligious anti-christ worshippers will not understand. Your twisted logic is failing you miserably. Best to keep your prejudice, ill-will and enmity within you and don't make comments where your sort are unwelcome due to your deparvity.
For folks who scream islamophobia as often, you guys sure love making racist attacks

I take it that this alliance in the making will not go down well with the Indians.
I dunno, you should ask them. Maybe you are being critical of them before the book is published on their take?

Separately, if you want my perspective on the alliance, then I think this alliance is quite confusing. I'm not sure against whom this alliance is in place for. And what is it going to do in terms of taking on that objective?

Are you guys going to walk into places with this army and contribute to say fight on terrorism or is this another fancy gathering waterhole and a military exercise source. I have not found anyone explain the POA(in articles), or a clear mandate written(by the alliance) thus far.
 
Last edited:
It is very much possible. Gen. Raheel Shareef is a thorough professional who led one of the best armies in the world and routed a fourth gen war on multiple fronts i.e. FATA, Baluchistan, and Karachi in addition to addressing the threat from the terrorist and rogue army of India in the east and RAW + NDS in the west. Thus it is not a surprise if Saudians asked his recommendations about their new COAS who can work alongside him in the coalition and also counter a plethora of threats to KSA. After KSA is the custodian of the holiest sites of Islam and it must be secured from threats.
 
Last edited:
For folks who scream islamophobia as often, you guys sure love making racist attacks


I dunno, you should ask them. Maybe you are being critical of them before the book is published on their take?

Separately, if you want my perspective on the alliance, then I think this alliance is quite confusing. I'm not sure against whom this alliance is in place for. And what is it going to do in terms of taking on that objective?

Are you guys going to walk into places with this army and contribute to say fight on terrorism or is this another fancy gathering waterhole and a military exercise source. I have not found anyone explain the POA(in articles), or a clear mandate written(by the alliance) thus far.
Your concern about the purposes of this military alliance is not my concern, unless you identify yourself or your nationality.
 
No caucasian americans care about such alliance or raheel sharif.
indians have been butt hurt since someone mutilated their soldiers:yahoo: so they are trying to vent out their anger here and false flags is their speciality.
 
His team , his decision. That is what Head of Alliance armies do they ensure all members of team are aligned with certain goals :enjoy:
 
The author has landed at the publisher's house(Raheel), he has taken over(Islamic alliance) and I hear he has even fired one the publisher's men(KSA's Army Chief).
Are you indian hidding himself bhind American flag...i feel like that. Generally Americans are not dum as you make me feel about you..second this military was made on the wish of Americans himself to clear the mess they have created which broght russia back in playing fields.. third economy of europ and USA is not allowing to put American and europen tex payer money to fight one more expensive war.RS is claver man he knows his job well. Most importan thing muslim will start owning this crap which was created by europ usa and so called muslim world himself..
 
Then why are you helping the crusading army or is it a sell out in exchange for our lifestyles?


No burn, we get paid regardless. I do find it ironical that an alliance was openly named with a religious bend, for only Islamic countries to be members yet supplied its finest weaponry by Christian nations.
have you lost your mind? Even a blind man can see that Christianity and Zionism have waged a Crusade against Islam. Why are you apologetic about it?
 
Suprised why this is even a news considering such actions are done every 4-5 years in most militaries of world Junior officials are promoted , older ones retire to focus on Haj

In side Saudia they changed 30-40 Internal ministry jobs on Basis of their King's decree (inside scoop). New Prince / officials were appointed in Local key positions :coffee:

Even Ambassadors to US were changed
Just a normal day in Saudia , no need to worry :pop:
 
Well if not calling it crusading armies has made any difference. They were in essence against Islamic countries. They happen to have fancy name as NATO or coalition. So what's the burn ?
How can islamic country be part of nato by your logic ?
 
Mostly consisting of Islamic nations and tasked with protecting Muslim interests against terrorism.



"Accusing"?

Western armies are crusaders by definition. Even Bush called Iraq war a 'crusade'

Reply By Smr Ahm: In fact, Bush decided to use Shia sect to fight against Sunni sect because in Muslim world, there are 85% Sunni Muslims and 15% Shia Muslims, So if Bush help only Shia Muslims, he can try to cover 85% population of Sunni Muslims. So in Afghanistan and Eraq, and Syria, only Sunni Muslims had been killed, and has been killed, and are being killed by Shia Governmnent Army in official manner with protection of their self-made law against Sunni Muslims. Although this is ;crusade', but only against Sunni Muslims.

3 to 4 Muslim countries have been engulfed in terrorism/internal wars. Alliance is there to protect Muslim world from this menace.



No.

Also, there are no "Sunni states" and "Shia states"....There are only Muslim/Islamic states.

There's no "Sunni-Shia" divide. It's "Iran vs Arabs" divide that predates Islam. Modern Sunni vs Shia conflict is a byproduct of Persians vs Arabs conflict.

Reply be Smr Ahm: In Saudi Arab, in Islamic Millitary Alliance, alongwith Sunni countries, there are also some Shia countries like Omaan, Azarbaijan etc.. So this is not sectarian
 
Appears that Raheel Pasha and 5K "advisors" haven't gone there for performing Umrah only!!!! They're there to follow the footsteps of Badr, Uhud, Handak, Mutah etc. warfares too!!!!! And, to reenact them in the present circumstances!!!!!
 
is it Sunni states vs Shia states?

No, It is 'Revolution Sponsoring State (Iran) vs Everyone else

FYI, Algeria is a shia state too... why it is in the Islamic Military Alliance if what you say is true ?
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom