jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I dont remember his exact words but i do remember him asking me to sit down rudely.
i too have always doubted the "big bang theory"... but then, that idea was propagated by mathematicians who always give precise numbers and predictions even when those don't work in the real universe... to me, mathematicians have the same credibility as economists and astrologers... none.
take the 2009 "prediction" of the chairman of nasscom ( association of indian info. tech. companies )... he had said very confidently then that the indian software industry will be earning trillions of dollars by 2030... but fours years later... 2014... indian it industry is effectively finished... some day soon, someone will publicly humiliate this fellow, and the other fool, yen aar narayamurthy.
and your professor also wouldn't have ever questioned about the definition of a planet... many people unquestioningly follow all the wrong things for decades, mainly because they are scared to question...
look at this very fine essay... ( Death to the Incapable Until Revolution* ).
I still cant understand how an artifical environment can be created when the surface of the so called moons will remain opaque and ergo the availability of sunlight would be zero???
good question... and the answer is two-fold...
1. when the moon ( or asteroid or spaceship or spaceship asteroid ) is generally in some light of a sun ( or star ), an arrangement of big mirrors, lens and air-tight glass windows will deliver sunlight... sunlight on earth's surface can really be concentrated to melt metal... ( Solar Furnace Melts Steel, Our Minds )...
2. when the moon ( or other worlds ) is far away from a sun... like how pluto is... artificial lighting can be used, which can deliver light close to the full spectrum of light... additionally, plant bioengineering can be used to force plants ( or crops ) to make their chlorophyll use a limited amount of artificial light spectrum... i am speculating of course, but i think it is possible.
It is hoped that scientists would one day start thinking of making use of the natural resources like asteroids and small moons to construct large cost effective spaceships to house space colonies to explore and colonize strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before!
i agree that asteroids can be dug into and spaceships created... i have said so somewhere earlier in this very thread... but i would say that the asteroid must not be too big because acceleration of the engines may break-up the asteroid.
but thanks for the detailed writing... and i agree about the effects of a rotating spaceship on its inhabitants... maybe nausea, from looking at the spinning star fields... maybe the inhabitants can live inside big internal drum mechanism which rotate... rather than rotating the entire asteroid-spaceship.