Vergennes
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,576
- Reaction score
- 61
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there a clause in the NATO charter that compels the placement of nuclear weapons on a host country?Then admit? Seriously? How did u arrive to this conclusion? The true reason is about NATO membership that opens the door for nukes to be placed in Ukraine. Why is it so hard for u to comprehend this?
Ukraine got rid of nukes and got assurity that it wont be invaded, now when they join NATO and place nukes in Ukraine, that assurity is void. Do u think once a NATO member, Ukraine wont allow nukes on its land??
The X-15 is a VEHICLE designed to study the effects of hypersonic speed on bodies.
Yup, people like you.
Am shocked...
I knew you would bring this up.
A nuclear weapon is primarily a POLITICAL weapon. Its sheer destructiveness in a single strike puts it into a separate category, which is to induce a political outcome irrespective of any other weapon. Nuclear weapons are not intended as a countermeasure against AWACS, for example. But if the US did not have nuclear weapons, then the war against JPN would have been prolonged for undetermined time.
Now, if you want to talk about a single weapon system that reduce the effectiveness of multiple platforms against it, then look at low radar observability, aka 'stealth'. A single 'stealth' fighter reduced the effectiveness of opposition fighters, ground air defense, and AWACS. Not only that, the 'stealth' fighter can also serve as a tactical short term point recon platform, meaning it can be sent to any location to gather intel that are short lived. So in terms of true utility, the 'stealth' fighter is even more of a real threat than the nuclear ICBM or even the hypersonic missile. The 'stealth' fighter is in the same class as the SSBN or nuclear missile sub.
Your argument ain't that clever, pal.
I have more than an ounce and I have actual military experience to go with it.
The truth can be quiet painfyl...please stop posting stuff like this, you will give @Hamartia Antidote deep depression followed by a nervous breakdown...
First of all, US already said even before the war started, they will not send US force in Ukraine.Sounds like misdirection or a distraction or a excuse not to send any USA forces to Ukraine.
I am so sad...Not.Congrats you have just made my ignore list. Now kindly do not address me or my posts, as your posts don't warrant any dignified response.
Goodbye.
loosing the nukes that you seem so distressed aboutIrrelevant. And how would YOU know if a nuclear warhead reached its EOL? What is your reference? Please do not bring on Iranian sources. But let us say that you are correct. What part of the warhead reached its EOL? Are you talking about the 1/2 life of the uranium or plutonium? Does this make the nuclear warhead any less dangerous?
Guilty of what?
Wait...The US-UK is guilty of losing Ukrainian nukes?loosing the nukes that you seem so distressed about
She's approaching levels of Biden
Depends on what you mean the "end"It is on going war. What is your analysis/guesses , my question is how long this war will last? and what will end this war?
BTW thanks for the reply.
Yes they do I have an image of it somewhere on my hard drive I’ll share it later.I mean metal tag like necklace