What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
neither of us knows that.
This is war and the fog will blind most of us.

Unfortunate deaths of combatants is to be expected, regardless of the side.
Nope, there's also a video of the event, but it's not in line with forum rules. He is shot after shoot at civilians. Since yesterday, saboteurs have been trying to infiltrate Kyiev. Numerous incidents were reported and images of some were shared.

And no, that can't be an excuse. There is an ethic of war. Most of these are written in the Geneva convention. Fight should be like a man. Moreover, the Russian army is not in a defensive position, but in an invader position. So such war crimes are in no way justifiable.
 
Died Russian soldiers, with Ukrainian army uniforms


The Russians are violating the Geneva Convention by completely ignoring the ethics of war.

FMb5W5uWYAIqdyu

These are the Russian soldiers that took the tanks with Ukrainian military uniforms. They got killed fast.
 
AJN: unconfirmed reports that sleeper cells of Russian soldiers/intelligence operatives are operating now in Kiev.
 
Ukrainians fighting Russian army today will not care. As far as they know, NATO membership was never in the negotiations between Ukraine and Russia when Russia made that WRITTEN promise not to attack Ukraine. When Russia made that promise, Russia never brought up NATO as part of concessions from Ukraine. So even if Ukraine made any overture to NATO, Russia is bounded, or expected to, remain with what was promised. Why is it so difficult to accept that NATO was not part of Russia's WRITTEN promise?

So you want to highlight the written promise?
All animals in your eyes are equal but SOME seem to be more equal than others.


Just a little list of the crap the USA have signed and ignored or broken.........

Capriciousness about international treaties is an old US tradition. It starts with the country’s very creation: hundreds of treaties signed with Native American tribes that were either broken, or not ratified. Today, the US is one of the countries to have ratified the fewest number of international human rights treaties—of the 18 agreements passed by the UN, America has only ratified five.

Treaties between the US and American Indian Nations (1722-1869)

According to the US national archives, 374 treaties (pdf, p.4) signed between the US and Native American Tribes from 1772 to 1867 were ratified. Of these, many were not respected: Only one article of the Pickering Treaty, or Treaty of Canadaigua of 1794, for instance, has been observed. Many others (18 in California alone, signed during the Gold Rush) were not even ratified. These include Treaty K, or the California Treaty, which promised reservations to American Indians within the state.

Treaty of Versailles, 1919

President Woodrow Wilson was a promoter and negotiator of the treaty that ended World War I. The agreement was signed between the Allied Powers and Germany; commenting on the US’s role in brokering the deal, Wilson famously said, “At last the world knows America as the savior of the world!”


However, the president encountered strong and growing opposition to the treaty in Congress, and the US never ratified the Treaty of Versailles. In fact, the US didn’t formally end its war against Germany and the former Austro-Hungarian empire until 1921.

International Labor Convention, 1949

The oldest treaty currently pending ratification in the Senate is an international recognition of the freedom of association and protection of the right to organize. The agreement was signed by 154 countries, including the US, and entered in full effect in 1950. However, the US never ratified it (pdf).

Geneva Agreement, 1954

The Conference of Geneva in 1954 was called to put a final end to the Korean War and First Indochina War. The treaty was signed by Vietnam, France, China, the USSR, and the UK. Although the US participated in the conference and negotiations, it eventually refused to sign. However, it did agree to respect the ceasefire.

International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), 1966

Building onto the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ICESCR expands the notion of basic rights beyond civil and political provisions. The agreement has been ratified by 166 countries. The US has signed, but has not ratified, the covenant.

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discriminations Against Women (CEDAW), 1979

By signing CEDAW in 1980, the US become one of 156 signatories of a landmark agreement to end gender discrimination. Shortly after signing, then-president Jimmy Carter submitted the agreement for ratification to the Senate. It’s still waiting.

The Law of the Sea, 1982

The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was held in Jamaica between 1973 and 1982. It established a set of rules and responsibilities governing the way countries and international bodies act in international waters. For instance, UNCLOS details the requirements of search and rescue at sea. In 1994, the US signed the agreement. However, it did not ratify it.

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), 1989

The CRC is a landmark human rights document for several reasons. It’s the first defining agreement on the rights of children, and it incorporate a wide range of rights (education, health, justice) for minors. It achieved broad support very quickly, with near-unanimous ratification across the globe.

The US signed the agreement in 1995. It is the only country that has not ratified it.

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, 1996

Although the treaty banning nuclear testing was adopted by the UN Assembly General in 1996, and has been ratified by 166 countries, the agreement is not yet into effect due to eight key countries who have not yet ratified it. The US, which signed in 1996, is one of them—the others are China, Egypt, India, Iran, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan.

Mine-Ban Treaty, or Ottawa Treaty, 1997

The mine ban’s goal is to eliminate anti-person mines, prohibiting their production, stockpiling, or use. The US is one of 33 states (including Russia, India, and China) that have signed but not ratified the treaty.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998

The Rome treaty establishing an international criminal court was negotiated by 148 countries. Of them, 120 approved of the final draft in 1998 (pdf), seven opposed it, and 21 abstained from voting.


Bill Clinton signed the agreement in 2000 but delayed submitting it to the Senate for ratification, on the grounds that the US needed to observe how the tribunal worked. Two years later, after the treaty had come into full effect and been ratified by 60 countries, George W Bush informed the United Nations that the US no longer intended to submit the agreement to the Senate for ratification at all.

Kyoto Protocol, 1997

Though the US signed the agreement limiting carbon emissions, it never intended to ratify it. The US is one of just four UN member states that have not enforced the agreement, with Andorra, Canada, and South Sudan.

Paris Climate Accord, 2015

The Paris deal to mitigate climate change by reducing emissions was signed by 195 member states in 2015, and became effective the following year. President Trump withdrew from the agreement on June 1, 2017. However, the US is still bound to follow the Paris deal’s requirements until 2020.
Several more international treaties are pending ratification from the US Senate, for a total of 45 between 1949 and 2017. The US is also notably absent from signing prominent international treaties including the Mine Ban Treaty, the Convention Against Torture, and on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.


Now lets stick to the fact the USA are no longer the empire they pretend to be. Russia will not allow the USA to dictate to them or use Ukraine as a proxy. They are exercising their right to protect THEIR INTERESTS.
You are now part of a minority. The USA will not be allowed to go shitting around the world and devastating nations. Look at your way of introducing democracy to Libya. Arent you ashamed of the star and stripes today? Be honest - if thats possible.
 
The worry is that the Russians won't bother with street fighting in the capital and just flatten it. A tactic they used in Syria.
They would lose dozens of soldiers daily if they tried to take the capital house to house.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom