What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Says the American poodle. You were also winning in Afghanistan not so long ago until you were not. Give it up.
Why every time someone states a fact you don’t agree with you resort to Afghanistan?
This is a Ukraine thread and they are on the offensive, anyone that can’t see that is blind, in denial or both
 
we are not talking about strategic mindset of cold war , we are dealing with one question.
Did West Germany had any border dispute with any country at 1955 when it joined NATO ? I'm not aware of any.
The world is not a court of law and I am not sure what the logic or applicability of your question is given the title of the threat.

W. Germany saw what its East Germany peer was going through. The wall had not yet gone up but the communism squeeze was evident.

Regardless, invasions are not based on legal precedence, court/legal or moral authority. They happen because the occupying / attacking side "IT" believes it has a right to do so, and if it can militarily prevail, than land goes to the attacker.

This is how the Ottoman's expanded, and Berbers got Spain. Russia used a similar justification, but it hasn't delivered because the military advisers were trying to keep the bad news out. And so we find ourselves here.

Russia has no more right on Ukraine than Ottoman's had over Hijaz. They just happen to win and then occupy.
 
60,000 is a lot but for a country of 151 million it's nothing. Also, Ukrainians have suffered just as many dead if not more. In terms of population advantage Russia gets better of Ukraine over time.




They don’t have proper boots. They wear street shoes? different colors? Crazy. No wonder, they steal shoes. Ukraine soldiers are better equipped.
 
Russia has no more right on Ukraine than Ottoman's had over Hijaz. They just happen to win and then occupy.

Why not? If countries can split. As South Sudan from Sudan, the US from Britain, Kosovo from Serbia, then countries can merge. We don't need more and more countries. We don't need thousands and thousands of countries.
 
what link , they made a deal , after USA pulled out , they break the deal.
what you think JCPOA was about.
what was the role of Europe in it .
there is a hundred+ page thread about it in Iranian section . you can read it, wonder why you guys cant do a small search and everything must be fed to you





those are EU duty that only partially happened till USA left the deal after it they didn't happen after usa left they told us to stay in deal and they use their blocking mechanism to neutralize USA sanction . they didn't do that
So you don’t know, and cannot pinpoint any specific clause…
 
Next stop Luhansk


ukraine-panzer.jpg

Ukraine auf dem Vormarsch: Soldaten fahren einen Panzer auf dem Weg nach Sewersk in der Region Donezk
© Inna Varenytsia / AP / DPA
 
Next stop Luhansk


ukraine-panzer.jpg

Ukraine auf dem Vormarsch: Soldaten fahren einen Panzer auf dem Weg nach Sewersk in der Region Donezk
© Inna Varenytsia / AP / DPA

Not gonna happen. The city is too big and too close to Russian border. Even in 2014 during ATO anti terror operation they were not able to take Luhansk.
 
Next stop Luhansk


ukraine-panzer.jpg

Ukraine auf dem Vormarsch: Soldaten fahren einen Panzer auf dem Weg nach Sewersk in der Region Donezk
© Inna Varenytsia / AP / DPA
this your first time following a war? let me give you some advice, wars go back and forward in momentum so its not even worth following most of the time. One side gets resupplied, makes gains and then the other side gets new toys and pushes back. Goes back and forward for years especially if no one is fully mobilised and throwing all their chips on the table.
 
Back
Top Bottom