What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

well if they think we attack them , they can attack us . our missiles can reach Ukraine from Iran , our drones can reach Ukraine from Iran .
on a side note we also reserve the right to attack anybody who pits weapon is used by the terrorist who attack us
Attacks on Iran by a nation in a conflict started by Iran is not terrorism, it is self-defense.
 
Real question here...why are the railroads being used to resupply the Russians still functional? Does anyone know? Wouldn't these rails be a primary target? Call me crazy, but one or two well placed missiles could certainly be money well spent. The intricacies of "polite" combat are certainly confusing.

This is a mystery to me too.
Obviously Russia has the capability to destroy these critical supply lines.

I think Russia in the beginning wanted to spare critical infra, because they didnt want to harm civillian life unneccesary.
 
if Forbes and TCF and NYTimes are aquired by IRGC

and NCR article from 5 years ago , the teachers wages have seen one of the highest rises in last 5-6 years compared to the rest and by the way NCR is a affiliated to some terrorist groups who have been proven to publish bullshit
the article was truth if it was 10 years ago
NY Times: yes its the ultimate Revolutionary newspaper. You are basing your facts on a US publication but you have never spoken to a teacher. And you expect the members here to NOT believe a publication because you accuse it of treachery, yet somehow the Govt magically listened to that bullshit and increased salaries.



Then why are teachers protesting? Also must not be true: If Iran with 40% of population living at pvoerty line, and the rich parking their money in Dubai can afford to supply third rate mopeds to Russia, US as the worlds top 5 highest per capita income certainly has no trouble giving $100Bn a year to Ukraine for as long as it takes.

This discussion is completely irrelevant but somehow you felt this was the path to go down on by starting this tangent.
 
This is a mystery to me too.
Obviously Russia has the capability to destroy these critical supply lines.

I think Russia in the beginning wanted to spare critical infra, because they didnt want to harm civillian life unneccesary.

Rails are easy to repair. An engineering battalion needs less than an hour do things like put a fill, compact, weld rails, and restore signalling
 
whats the penetration of tow-2b
and yes it explode 2m above tank it has two charge , one directly down and one slightly forward to hit the target . and whatever you say Tow-2A have a lot better chance destroying a tank than TOW-2b and Javelin have better chance destroying tanks than TOW
TOW is harder to use , you must keep target in sight , its heavier and is not one man weapon . a lot harder to ambush enemy with it , the tow Ukraine received are mounted on truck so they are even harder to hide. and so I again say they are downgrade compared to Javelin . if you are arguing TOW-2b top Attack is as effective or better than Javelin , well that is your belief . reality is something else
Fact is the TOW system is going to destroy any armor the russians are going to field on the open plains of Ukraine. Its nothing like youre portraying it.
The TOW system is basically the NATO version of the Stuhna. I think the ukrainians will manage to use it for ambush or static defence as theyve done with the Stuhna.
Ukraine have recieved 10.000? Javelin missiles and 50.000? NLAW, EC LAW, Matador.. theyll find some use of the TOW systems range.
 
Fact is the TOW system is going to destroy any armor the russians are going to field on the open plains of Ukraine. Its nothing like youre portraying it.
The TOW system is basically the NATO version of the Stuhna. I think the ukrainians will manage to use it for ambush or static defence as theyve done with the Stuhna.
Ukraine have recieved 10.000? Javelin missiles and 50.000? NLAW, EC LAW, Matador.. theyll find some use of the TOW systems range.

Javelin, No need to find a weak spot. This is a "fire and forget" shoulder launched system. Anything it locks onto will be blown to smithereens.
 
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

LOL where are those Russians that say the SU-57 are better than the F-35

"The Su-57 suffers from a low production rate. Export models are unlikely to be available until the end of the decade."

 
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

LOL where are those Russians that say the SU-57 are better than the F-35

"The Su-57 suffers from a low production rate. Export models are unlikely to be available until the end of the decade."


Su-57 is a «failed» design.
Russia lacks the funding and tech necessary to build and mass produce a true 5th-gen fighter.
 
Sweden sells bofor guns to India that has killed Pakistani civilians at line of control inside Pakistan.

Is Pakistan now allowed to fire blastic missiles towards Sweden?

No because Sweden sold Saab 2000 AEW&C to Pakistan.

Show proof that Turkiye is helping Russia or Iran is helping Ukraine.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom