What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Real issue in ukriane isn't the tank failure
It's is the failure to establish airpower

Russia has failed to establish air superiority in ukriane...

The first order of business is always to destroy opposition air force, runaways and infrastructure..

Russia didn't do anything of such
 

How do Europeans now respond to Ukrainian refugees?


LOL


The world hasn't been in a greater crisis since the world wars. Climate crisis. Economic crisis. Territorial conflicts. Food shortages.
 
Last edited:

The uncle Tom's in this topic won't call it by its name. I will. This is a shock and awe against Ukrainian power infrastructure. The Russians are now deliberately targeting very specific infrastructure. This isn't the emotional pounce and run tactic. This is a carefully crafted policy to cripple Nazi Zelensky. Russia will continue this targeted assault against critical infrastructure. Something they should have done from day one. Nevertheless the effect on the ground is massive. Ukrainians understand that Zelensky won't be there to save the day during the ice cold winter.

All one has to do is listen to the cries of Zelensky. His words and cries of helplessness speak volume.
 
Real question here...why are the railroads being used to resupply the Russians still functional? Does anyone know? Wouldn't these rails be a primary target? Call me crazy, but one or two well placed missiles could certainly be money well spent. The intricacies of "polite" combat are certainly confusing.
 
surely buying from Iran is a stop gap

so what is Russias long term goal here ?

they are running low on almost everything
 
Even the zionists are starting to see the writing on the wall and want nothing to do. With this nato humiliation

The zionist system sent would not only get humiliated once its saturated and destroyed by precision strikes rock throwing hamas lacks

But this would also piss Russia off to a degree, that the next major zionist war, they would be facing a combined alliance of Iran, Russia, Syria and Hezbollah

Hezbollah alone is enough to humiliate the pathetic zionists. Imagine those 3 countries added…. I doubt the zionist entity would survive long under these circumstances.

It would take once weekly maintenance attacks by hezbollah to completely paralyze the zionist economy

Half of zionist security is dependent on hot air and fear. Arabs have this inferior feeling towards zionjsts that thinm of them as this invincible force. Iranians and Iran allies dont share such delusions
 
According to grey zone (wagner) the situation is even worse in Kherson than it was in Kharkiv.


Even the zionists are starting to see the writing on the wall and want nothing to do. With this nato humiliation

The zionist system sent would not only get humiliated once its saturated and destroyed by precision strikes rock throwing hamas lacks

But this would also piss Russia off to a degree, that the next major zionist war, they would be facing a combined alliance of Iran, Russia, Syria and Hezbollah

Hezbollah alone is enough to humiliate the pathetic zionists. Imagine those 3 countries added…. I doubt the zionist entity would survive long under these circumstances.

It would take once weekly maintenance attacks by hezbollah to completely paralyze the zionist economy

Half of zionist security is dependent on hot air and fear. Arabs have this inferior feeling towards zionjsts that thinm of them as this invincible force. Iranians and Iran allies dont share such delusions

Beware there's a juice under your bed.
 
There we have it. As I predicted. Russia continues to pounce more critical infrastructure.


Winter is coming and the Ukrainians have lesser power plants at their disposal. We are going to see massive power cuts across Ukraine.

Already almost a third of the country's power stations have been destroyed in a wave of air strikes since Monday last week.

Most of those power plants already not operational or hardly operational due to lack of fuel. Especially nuclear power plants since Russia banned uranium export to Ukraine.


T-62M shoots laser guided missiles range 4 km. It knocks out T-72 from beyond enagagement range of T-72.
 
first simply there is a problem with that tank , there is a reason they use shaped charges in atgm
second only TOW-2B or BGM-71F have Top attack capability in its rudimentary form a javelin hit the tank from top . TOW-2B fly above the target and explode 2m above the target , if you think the effect is the same i have nothing to add
a BGM-71C or BGM-71D have 900mm armor penetration a BGM-71E have 900mm penetration after ERA a TOW-2B well classified but we made a copy of it in form of Toofan-3 and Toofan-3m it was a lot less performing than other variant of Toofan missile , let just say around 100mm . so show me a video that prove the hatches above that tank were not open


and NLAWs were effective ,
against these
800px-Taistelun%C3%A4yt%C3%B6s_NLAW_3_Kokonaisturvallisuus_2015.JPG
You are basically just talking nonsense.
You said: Tow top attack mode is just fly 1-2m above tank and explode there only good against targets like Humvee or if infantry is hiding behind a wall cant penetrate tanks.

I challenge you to hide inside a T72 in line of sight of a TOW-2B. Its designed to penetrate armor, not infantry hidding behind something. And when I posted a test of the TOW system you just claim something was wrong with the tank…

The NLAW has proven itself in Ukraine, actually at the very beginning of the war:
 
Swedish are expert in neutrality. They were the only country who earned billions from nazis during WW2..you have to give it to them
Sweden declared itself to non-belligerent in December 1939.

Anyway, it does not violate neutrality to trade most goods with a belligerent nation.
Sweden traded both with Germany and with the Allies.

As Sweden had broken the crypto in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens_and_Halske_T52 Geheimschreiber it knew exactly where the red lines were for Germany. Germany considered invading Sweden several times because of obstinate behaviour.
 
I challenge you to hide inside a T72 in line of sight of a TOW-2B. Its designed to penetrate armor, not infantry hidding behind something. And when I posted a test of the TOW system you just claim something was wrong with the tank…

The NLAW has proven itself in Ukraine, actually at the very beginning of the war:
whats the penetration of tow-2b
and yes it explode 2m above tank it has two charge , one directly down and one slightly forward to hit the target . and whatever you say Tow-2A have a lot better chance destroying a tank than TOW-2b and Javelin have better chance destroying tanks than TOW
TOW is harder to use , you must keep target in sight , its heavier and is not one man weapon . a lot harder to ambush enemy with it , the tow Ukraine received are mounted on truck so they are even harder to hide. and so I again say they are downgrade compared to Javelin . if you are arguing TOW-2b top Attack is as effective or better than Javelin , well that is your belief . reality is something else
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom