What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

. . . . . .
So far AUF crushed 1 firebase which was covering the whole of northeast of Khesanh, but one located closer to Khesanh, covering Snihurivka is still operational as of 20th.

RUAF have artillery, and AUF have some tanks to spare.
 
. . .
Are you being serious? Does that mean the NLAWs provided to Ukraine had no effect against MBTs too?

TOW top attack:
first simply there is a problem with that tank , there is a reason they use shaped charges in atgm
second only TOW-2B or BGM-71F have Top attack capability in its rudimentary form a javelin hit the tank from top . TOW-2B fly above the target and explode 2m above the target , if you think the effect is the same i have nothing to add
a BGM-71C or BGM-71D have 900mm armor penetration a BGM-71E have 900mm penetration after ERA a TOW-2B well classified but we made a copy of it in form of Toofan-3 and Toofan-3m it was a lot less performing than other variant of Toofan missile , let just say around 100mm . so show me a video that prove the hatches above that tank were not open


and NLAWs were effective ,
against these
800px-Taistelun%C3%A4yt%C3%B6s_NLAW_3_Kokonaisturvallisuus_2015.JPG
 
Last edited:
. . .
Just as jhun predicted 2w ago. RUAF are getting flanked north of Khesanh.

The "plug" that was blocking the road to Beryslav from the north was weak, and folded upon first concerted assault.

I was puzzled what AFU were waiting in Brid, and now it appears they were waiting for this.
 
.
.
INS is not precise enough, Iran drones most likely use Russia assistance or Glonass in addition. If satelitte guided or man guided from the Crimea as the Nato believe then the signals can be jammed. I don’t see why technically not possible.

About gepard flak tank, it’s 360 degree Radar can detect those deep flying drones far away and alert Ukraine air defense. That’s why the Gepard was developed, to detect and fight deep flying Soviet aircraft. What has gepard radar wave length to do with Iran guidance system?
where i said , Iran drones use ins to hit the target , if they wanted to use INS , they would have been another V1 . they are not , INS is there to help if the connection to satellite is lost , it use that ins to go toward the target , and as soon as it find satellite connection for several second , it fix that ins inaccuracy problem , if again the satellite is lost it again fallback to ins and continue toward target , if again it can connect to satellite well no problem , it fix the coordinate and INS and go toward the target , if no the satellite don't come back , no biggie its only less than 20000$ , sorry children in kindergarten that it fall on your head , your government was too lazy to effectively counter the drone, or just cared about the elites not you.

about Gepard radar , like any radar it has its limitation . let compare normal drone to F-4 and this drone to F-117 . a question for you do the radars detect them at the same distances?
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom