Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are saying that patients I am seeing in my clinic are my delusions..??
Homeless and hungry Appalachians is reality that some people don't want to see
PBS USA owned...
That’s nothing. Still no tanks, no helos, no aircraft, no cruise missiles, no ballistic missiles. There is lots of No’s. Comparing to what weaponry Putin invasion army has used against Ukraine army. They even use hypersonic, they use phosphor bombs.Seems like a full NATO inventory assault on Russians in Ukraine.
Then cost was the factor and hence the T72s and T80s. Do you think bringing back the T64s would improve their chances or odds compared to using T72s to T90s in the war?look it up , it was t-64 it was apparently more expensive to produce it than t-72 and you knew how Russia was at the end of 90s
t72 and t-80 had some modernization , t80 was supposed to be elite force and t-72 cheap main force in high number , t64 was what t80 was based on .
its like you decide between the 9th generation Xeon processor or 12th generation core I3
Helos? WTF is Ukraine going to do with helos when they are shooting the Russians ones so easily. Let them fight and win an 'info-tech' war against one that is a 'industrial-tech' doctrineThat’s nothing. Still no tanks, no helos, no aircraft, no cruise missiles, no ballistic missiles. There is lots of No’s. Comparing to what weaponry Putin invasion army has used against Ukraine army. They even use hypersonic, they use phosphor bombs.
As ex a spy Putin is a professional liar. I would not trust any words coming from his mouth. Same coming from other three liars Lavrov, Peskow, Medwedew. To understand what Putin wants you can follow his mastermind, the russian nationalist Alexander Dugin.Whats with the conciliatory tone: it goes from severe consequences to 'no need to attack more'.
ANd mobilization to end in two weeks and troop strength to stabilize in two weeks.
More irrational disjointed behavior OR US assessment is correct that weapons stocks are depleting and signal for negotiation OR something big is coming up
Putin says "no need" for more mass strikes amid report of missile shortage
Earlier in the day, Ukraine's defense minister said that only a third of Russia's missile inventory remains.www.newsweek.com
Speaking to reporters Friday in a rare Q&A session, Putin said, "There is no need now for massive strikes. There are other tasks." He added that Russia's goal isn't "destroying Ukraine," according to The Moscow Times, an independent news outlet.
Not even close. I don't see any F-16s, ATACMS, long range loitering munitions, long range cruise missiles, etc.Seems like a full NATO inventory assault on Russians in Ukraine.
That means Putin can't attack Ukraine consistently like he did in response to the bridge attack. And he's trying to calms things down with Russians panicking and fleeing the country by saying he is stopping his partial mobilization in 2 weeks...for now.Whats with the conciliatory tone: it goes from severe consequences to 'no need to attack more'.
ANd mobilization to end in two weeks and troop strength to stabilize in two weeks.
More irrational disjointed behavior OR US assessment is correct that weapons stocks are depleting and signal for negotiation OR something big is coming up
Putin says "no need" for more mass strikes amid report of missile shortage
Earlier in the day, Ukraine's defense minister said that only a third of Russia's missile inventory remains.www.newsweek.com
Speaking to reporters Friday in a rare Q&A session, Putin said, "There is no need now for massive strikes. There are other tasks." He added that Russia's goal isn't "destroying Ukraine," according to The Moscow Times, an independent news outlet.
You ain't seen not even 1/2.Seems like a full NATO inventory assault on Russians in Ukraine.
They going to full mobilization or still partial? Putin says he will stop in 2 weeks. If losing 50k plus Russian troops and other personnel wasn't a war in last 8 months, I shudder to think how the Russians feel in a real war. Many hundreds of thousands Russian eligible men fled and its not even a real war yet.Look like the war finally begins...
i believe if instead of focusing on T-72 and its derivate T-90 , they focused on T-80 which was successor of t-64 and then their t-90 was based on T-80 they had better chance , right now upgraded t-64 will be something like t-80 , upgraded t-62 , depended on upgrade i doubt it but perhaps equal to t-80 or t-72 more probably worseThen cost was the factor and hence the T72s and T80s. Do you think bringing back the T64s would improve their chances or odds compared to using T72s to T90s in the war?
Only a fraction.You ain't seen not even 1/2.
Well in case whether they can refurbish the 800 T64 tanks, the problem is the crew since many are being abandoned in Kherson offensive and falling into Ukrainian hands. So imagine many of those upgraded T64s falling in their hands.i believe if instead of focusing on T-72 and its derivate T-90 , they focused on T-80 which was successor of t-64 and then their t-90 was based on T-80 they had better chance , right now upgraded t-64 will be something like t-80 , upgraded t-62 , depended on upgrade i doubt it but perhaps equal to t-80 or t-72 more probably worse