Already did. If they just don't recognize two China, why not admit Taiwan as "Taiwan"
as i said did Taiwan declared independence , thats news to me
You don't need veto, in fact, I would argue article 6 does not even applies in Taiwan case, again, if Veto is needed to bump Taiwan off, that would never happen. Another issue is Article 6 also included a clause Taiwan need to be repeating violate UN charter, tell me which UN Charter ROC had repeatedly violate?
Which mean article 6 does not at all applies at all when Taiwan was kick out of UN.
ask Taiwanese about rule of generals there and they tell you how democratic it was and more importantly article-6 never used against china , Taiwan was never a member of UN it was china who was a member, before 1971 the delegation was selected in Taipei after 1971 General assembly rulled that the delegation must be selected by peking
You do know abstained vote DID NOT count toward the total cast, right?
The result is 76 for to 35 against. That's 76/111 = 68%, you needed 66%.
wrong again abstained votes will be counted toward the outcome, its stated as 2/3 0f the total votes that include yes, no and abstain , if a country don't vote or don't participate in the voting that wont be counted . again go and look at the number of votes and sum them up , you see several country like Spain and some other members didn't participate , so it was a vote by majority not a vote by 2/3rd , USA wanted to make it a vote by 2/3, they failed if they succeed to do that today it was Taipei who selected china delegate in un not Peking if you read the wiki article about the resolution completely it's explained there
Taiwan bid as Taiwan or why not just replace UNSC with PRC and then created another entity as Taiwan if Sovereignty of Taiwan is NOT an issue here?
because resolution 2758 recognize Taiwan as part of china and Taiwan never declared independence , they want to join UN , good they had to first declare independence
Already did. If they just don't recognize two China, why not admit Taiwan as "Taiwan"
as i said did Taiwan declared independence , thats news to me
You don't need veto, in fact, I would argue article 6 does not even applies in Taiwan case, again, if Veto is needed to bump Taiwan off, that would never happen. Another issue is Article 6 also included a clause Taiwan need to be repeating violate UN charter, tell me which UN Charter ROC had repeatedly violate?
Which mean article 6 does not at all applies at all when Taiwan was kick out of UN.
ask Taiwanese about rule of generals there and they tell you how democratic it was and more importantly article-6 never used against china , Taiwan was never a member of UN it was china who was a member, before 1971 the delegation was selected in Taipei after 1971 General assembly rulled that the delegation must be selected by peking
You do know abstained vote DID NOT count toward the total cast, right?
The result is 76 for to 35 against. That's 76/111 = 68%, you needed 66%.
wrong again abstained votes will be counted toward the outcome, its stated as 2/3 0f the total votes that include yes, no and abstain , if a country don't vote or don't participate in the voting that wont be counted . again go and look at the number of votes and sum them up , you see several country like Spain and some other members didn't participate , so it was a vote by majority not a vote by 2/3rd , USA wanted to make it a vote by 2/3, they failed if they succeed to do that today it was Taipei who selected china delegate in un not Peking if you read the wiki article about the resolution completely it's explained there
Taiwan bid as Taiwan or why not just replace UNSC with PRC and then created another entity as Taiwan if Sovereignty of Taiwan is NOT an issue here?
because resolution 2758 recognize Taiwan as part of china and Taiwan never declared independence , they want to join UN , good they had to first declare independence
