dbc
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2009
- Messages
- 6,551
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
What are you talking about Taliban controlled 25% of Afghanistan while NATO was there. They held many pockets.
Taliban just ran NATO for dry and exhausted them plus the terrain was not ideal for the US. IEA was ready for a 100-year campaign which NATO doesn't want any of it otherwise they can go back for a straight out 100-year war.. It almost lead to US economy crisis and if continued could lead to US economy collapse. The Afghans arms are cheap and logisics it doesn't cost them much unlike the US that uses 50-bilion a year..
IEA greatest asset is patience and consistency.. These bastards can go 100-years easy
NATO forces had no desire to hold territory in the boonies. They did go in and clear Taliban fighters from remote villages and then RTB, after a few months the Taliban would reappear ....rinse and repeat for two decades. The reality is Afghanistan isn't a real country, its people don't even buy into the notion of Afghanistan, its just a collection of tribes that want to be left alone. Nation building in Afghanistan was a fools errand, it took us twenty years to figure that out. And at no point was the US economy at risk of collapse due to Afghanistan.