What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Footage of a Ukrainian FPV drone striking a Russian T-72 tank. The drone was armed with an RPG-7 grenade, the attack took place in the Maryinka area. Despite the impact, the tank continued to carry out its combat mission, the crew was saved by the dynamic protection installed on the tank.


A Russian T-64 tank breaks through a minefield in Ukraine. Footage has been published of a Russian T-64 tank overcoming a minefield of American mines of the M70 and M73 types, both types of mines are now used by the Ukrainian army. Mines are produced in anti-personnel and anti-tank versions and do not differ from each other outwardly. Mines are installed by the RAAMS remote mining system at a distance of up to 24 km, they are delivered by 155 mm M741 / M718 shells, each contains 9 mines. The first part of the video shows the found remains of these mines in Ukraine, the second part is the direct overcoming of the minefield by the tank.


Published footage of a massive bombing strike by Russian aircraft in Ukraine. There are no details of the bombing strike when it was carried out. According to preliminary data, the air strike was carried out in the area of the Oskol river bank in the Kupyansk direction.


Footage of an attempt by a Ukrainian T-64BV tank to attack a stronghold of the Russian army. For some unknown reason, the T-64 tank, without support, went to attack the stronghold alone. The tank received two ATGM hits and was destroyed.


The disguised radar 79K6 "Pelican" of the Ukrainian army came under attack from the Russian kamikaze drone "Lancet". Radar 79K6 "Pelikan" was put into service in 2007, the detection range of radar targets is up to 400 km, at an altitude of 100 meters up to 40 km. The number of tracked targets is more than 300. The deployment time of the Pelican radar is 30 minutes.


-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
jhungary said:
It did actually.

US is no longer neutral after USS Stark incident, plus, part of the Iran Territorial water were inside that shipping lane, as per customary law of the sea, US Navy Warship CAN and WILL transit thru Iranian Territorial Water.
Click to expand...
only innocent passage, don't forget that and USA is not a signatory of that law.
so you say the sop allow a delusional captain chase imaginary non existent ships in other countries territorial water.
and you say after uss stark USA was not neutral , interestingly uss stark was Iraq handiwork not Iran and USA never engaged Iraq . and also even before uss stark USA was not neutral what gave you the idea USA was neutral before that.
 
Hack-Hook said:
only innocent passage, don't forget that and USA is not a signatory of that law.
so you say the sop allow a delusional captain chase imaginary non existent ships in other countries territorial water.
and you say after uss stark USA was not neutral , interestingly uss stark was Iraq handiwork not Iran and USA never engaged Iraq . and also even before uss stark USA was not neutral what gave you the idea USA was neutral before that.
Click to expand...
Dude, it's about a war, not peace time, Iran was already at war, you can't declare a war when there is a war going on already, what do you think the US will do when they were shot at? That crossing does not trigger out of no where, it triggered from Iranian Gunboat firing at USS Vincennes Helicopter in international water, so what would you say about that?

You seems to focus on this when US Warship entered Iranian Water probably a thousand time, even with USS Vincennes, just before this incident, they were in Iranian Water engaging and sunk 2 gunboats, and before that Elmar Montgomery did engage with Iranian gunboat in Iranian water, and there is a battle Operation Praying Mantis, that came from Iranian mine hitting USS Sam B Roberts.

How hard is it to understand if you shoot at US Shipping in international water, THAT'S ALREADY AN ACT OF WAR. Subsequent Casus Belli is not really that important.

And again, you can call US policy is biased against you or whatever, that's another topic, you are talking about whether or not it's disobeying an order for the captain to enter Iranian Water. The answer is NO after he was fired upon. Just as entering Iranian Waters is an act of war, Firing at US Navy Ships/Aircraft in international waters is ALSO an act of war. And again, no Judiciary and Punitive punishment were given after the Fogarty Report, he (Rogers) is entitled to the medal.
 
jhungary said:
Dude, it's about a war, not peace time, Iran was already at war, you can't declare a war when there is a war going on already, what do you think the US will do when they were shot at? That crossing does not trigger out of no where, it triggered from Iranian Gunboat firing at USS Vincennes Helicopter in international water, so what would you say about that?
Click to expand...
there is zero evidence of that, even there was no paint scratch on the helicopter and it happened after the helicopter chased iranian boat if true .
incidentally vincense violated international law by entering Iranian territorial water outside an area they had to use for innocent passage and. when launching the helicopter they showed they were not innocents . al;so the fact that usa for 3 years tried to hide the location of the ship.
also usa sop was about aircraft under 2000 feet , flight 655 was more than 7000 feet above ground
jhungary said:
How hard is it to understand if you shoot at US Shipping in international water, THAT'S ALREADY AN ACT OF WAR. Subsequent Casus Belli is not really that important.
Click to expand...
the question is who opened the first fire Iranian boats or USA ships that tried to stop iran inspecting ships that were carrying illegal cargo

jhungary said:
And again, you can call US policy is biased against you or whatever, that's another topic, you are talking about whether or not it's disobeying an order for the captain to enter Iranian Water. The answer is NO after he was fired upon. Just as entering Iranian Waters is an act of war, Firing at US Navy Ships/Aircraft in international waters is ALSO an act of war. And again, no Judiciary and Punitive punishment were given after the Fogarty Report, he (Rogers) is entitled to the med
Click to expand...
he fired upon after following Iranian ships into Iranian territorial water and even according to USA it was a warning shot when they closed to half the distance USA rule of engagement told them they can go near ships

also disobeying the order happened when he left its assigned position to go help a non existent ship that he made up and as result come in contact with Iranian boats
 
Hack-Hook said:
there is zero evidence of that, even there was no paint scratch on the helicopter and it happened after the helicopter chased iranian boat if true .
Click to expand...

Sure, wahtever you say.
Hack-Hook said:
incidentally vincense violated international law by entering Iranian territorial water outside an area they had to use for innocent passage and. when launching the helicopter they showed they were not innocents . al;so the fact that usa for 3 years tried to hide the location of the ship.
also usa sop was about aircraft under 2000 feet , flight 655 was more than 7000 feet above ground
Click to expand...

Well, no, in fact, Iran tried to sue US in ICJ (and US Counter Sue) after Operation Praying Mantis.

ICJ throw both case out.


Hack-Hook said:
the question is who opened the first fire Iranian boats or USA ships that tried to stop iran inspecting ships that were carrying illegal cargo


he fired upon after following Iranian ships into Iranian territorial water and even according to USA it was a warning shot when they closed to half the distance USA rule of engagement told them they can go near ships

also disobeying the order happened when he left its assigned position to go help a non existent ship that he made up and as result come in contact with Iranian boats
Click to expand...
Again, whatever you say. If you say it's non-exist then Iit is non-exist, ship or everything is fake.

I seriously and honestly don't really care.
 

Similar threads

D
KNDS sucessfully tests new Ascalon 140mm gun future main weapon of MGCS.
Replies
1
Views
844
LegionnairE
LegionnairE
H
  • Article
6th September: Defense Day of Pakistan and MM Alam's World Record in Air Defense
Replies
1
Views
443
AbdulQadir7
A
ghazi52
Once Pak-India govts are removed from the frame, you would find ordinary people
Replies
0
Views
313
ghazi52
ghazi52
ghazi52
Six killed, 13 wounded in Kabul suicide bombing
Replies
1
Views
671
ghazi52
ghazi52
艹艹艹
5,900 e-buses are in operation in Latin America, with BYD, Foton and Yutong leading
Replies
0
Views
304
艹艹艹
艹艹艹

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom