What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Guess they need to speed things up. Especially the Paladins. I'm also hoping for more artillery as well like at least 200 or so from other countries besides the tanks. Cluster munitions also important, Biden shouldn't worry about it since Ukrainian government is requesting them and are using it against the large masses of troops. They can worry about cleaning them up later after the war. Allowing Russians to push through any coming offensive that could lead to more destruction on the cities nearby.


Also on twitter people mentioned about minimum of 400 Challenger 1 tanks. Maybe Chieftain tanks as well.


According to open source information, Jordan would have around 400 Challenger 1 Main Battle Tanks (MBTs) in store. The Jordanian defense company King Abdullah II Design and Development Bureau upgraded Jordanian Challenger MBTs which were named as Al-Hussein.

The Jordanian Challenger tanks are no longer in service and are replaced by 141 ex-Italian Army B1 Centauro 8x8 Mobile Gun Systems as well as ex-German Marder 1A3 tracked armored Infantry Fighting Vehicles.

The company RBSL, a joint venture between the German company Rheinmetall and the British company BAE Systems based in the United Kingdom will be able to refurbish Challenger 1. In May 2021, RBSL announced it had been awarded an £800m contract to upgrade 148 Challenger 3 Main Battle Tanks for the British Army.

The Challenger 2 being an upgrade of the Challenger 1, the company RBSL could possibly carry out the refurbishment in combat conditions of the Challenger 1 tanks coming from Jordan.

The Challenger 1 entered into service with the British in 1982, but despite its age, the Challenger 1 could still be very effective against Russian tanks thanks to its 120 mm gun but also still offer a high level of protection. During the first Gulf War in 1990–1991 The Challenger, in comparison with the American tank used in the Gulf, offering more mobility and firepower. Overall, Challenger 1 destroyed roughly 300 Iraqi Soviet-made tanks, while the Iraqi forces failed to take a single tank out of combat. During operation Desert Storm the Challenger 1 tank engaged an enemy target at a range of 5,100 m.
Challenger 1's would be a fantastic idea if Jordan will release them and they can be repaired. You have to realise Jordan retired them - so they are quite probably past their service lives aready. And yes you are right - Challenger 1s beat up Iraqi T-72 derivatives REAL GOOD..

Unfortunately the UK right now lacks the industrial capability to refurbish those tanks and that is why it has teamed up with a german company for Challenger 3.

The UK has run down its tank industry entirely at the altar of "market efficiency..."
 
Last edited:
According to the Mossad, about 18,000 Russian soldiers and 157,000 Ukrainian soldiers were killed in this war so far..

548247

548248

548250


Breaking: British Ministry of Defense: Russian forces succeed in their attempts to isolate the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, with the aim of surrounding it..
@AsharqNewsBrk
Ah yes a minitiature turkish media agency managed to find secret mossad intelligence that happens to perfectly mirror Russian military propaganda sources 🤪

Russian human wave attacks but they are getting 1:9 deathrate in their favor…
While losing 50% of conquered area….
 
Yeah Europeans like you legally killed millions of Indians and African barbarians
Humans like you killed many more.

France till date has legally occupied African colonies
England legally occupied Falkland.
Swedish legally financed the Nazis and so on.


Everything is legal for powerful

And You think that your fantasies improves things?
 
Humans like you killed many more.



And You think that your fantasies improves things?
Last I checked Indians never attacked or colonized Europe

Of all European I believe three are the worst.

Sweds since they are the biggest hypocrites and were Nazi expansion machine

British since they killed more Indians then Nazis.

French since they have no shame and kept killing spree when rest of world became civilized and gave up on it.

For reminder for swedes hypocrites
 
What are the Russians sending besides mobilized troops? What kind of tanks they are sending? Armatas and T90s? Putin sending in his personal Centurion guard?
Well, they can't send much, there are no one to send, unless Putin want to degrade their military capability further

However, even if they send in Somalian Volunteer and give them enough Armour and Fighter Escort, they will make progress, as I said, it's not who is fighting the war, but how they fight, they are now training up their mobilised troop to regular troop level, while not elite level but that still have some gas left in the tank, and IF THEY PUT THEIR ACT TOGETHER, that's still dangerous.
 
Which means that Israel now has a legal right to attack the aggressor Iran.
Iran, as the aggressor does not have a right to attack Israel.

Iran has staid neutral in the Ukraine war. The Kievan regime however declared war on Iran and claimed to have conducted military aggression against Iran. Iran therefore has the right to attack the aggressor Ukraine. Neither Ukraine nor its allies have any right to attack Iran.

I am kinda tired of you bring stupid legal issues.

Legality has no meaning in the world.

Was it legal for Israel to get nukes or bomb Iraq or assinate civilians in different countries

Was it legal for US to attack Iraq ?

Is it and was it legal for France to colonize and continue to colonize all of the world.

Was it legal for France to kill millions in Algerian war post Hitler

Was it legal for USA to ban nelson Mandela call him terrorist?

Was it legal to support apthraid state?
Was it legal to carry fascism in 1960-70s in USA.

Legality has no value or meaning in this world.

Most best example is how general assembly has passed several times condemnation of Israeli killings but been vetoed by USA everytime

In addition to what you explained, the issue is that the user's legal arguments are usually flawed. Presenting a selective picture of legal principles, regulations and practice, and also resorting to double standards and rhetoric figures to further their Atlanticist and zionist apologetics.
 
Last edited:
Iran has staid neutral in the Ukraine war. The Kievan regime however declared war on Iran and claimed to have conducted military aggression against Iran. Iran therefore has the right to attack the aggressor Ukraine. Neither Ukraine nor its allies have any right to attack Iran.



In addition to what you explained, problem is that this individual is making a mockery of international law. Presenting a selective picture of legal principles, regulations and practice, and also resorting to double standards and rhetoric figures to push their Atlanticist and zionist apologetics.
International law mostly has no meaning..it's mostly might is right
 
Of all European I believe three are the worst.

Sweds since they are the biggest hypocrites and were Nazi expansion machine

Ironically, it seems they're not exactly improving Sweden's image in the eyes of numerous Pakistani and Moslem readers of this forum.

International law mostly has no meaning..it's mostly might is right

There's truth to that, not denying it. What I was referring to, is the purely theoretical dimension. At that level too, the arguments put forth happen to be far from foolproof.
 
Last edited:
Ironically, it seems they're doing a good job causing prejudice to Sweden's image in the eyes of Pakistani and Moslem readers of this forum.



There's truth to that, not denying it. What I was referring to, is the purely theoretical dimension. At that level too, the arguments put forth happen to be far from foolproof.
Most of people have great respect for swedes since they were one of the only few Europeans who didn't colonize but if you dig deeper you find them everywhere behind the scenes
 
Back
Top Bottom