What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

West needs to step up and provide more then single digit military aid….if they want to end this faster instead of dragging this war on.

It is clear Putin digged himself in a hole. He cannot retreat back without something to show for. In meantime…Any alternative to his power did not step up (or simply fell out of a window). Save perhaps the Wagner leader which is even worse replacement for Putin.

The russians in the meantime act like good cannon fodder to the Tsar. Its insane to see them complaining and grumbling (not on the atrocities committed on their ukranian brothers but purely selfishly)…., but still form the next scout/wave to attack. It is clear 100.000 casualties is not enough to get some sense into them.

Stop sending this 1 MLRS here and there.
Give ukraine enough to fill several artillery brigades and pack them with cluster munition, long range munitions, full drone/radar/satellite intel.



EU is just being the hesitating, pacifistic, short sighted (next voting term!) bunch like so often. Which explains the weak reponse.

Usa seems to be more content to drag this out? It will demolish russia fully, weaken eu (and make them more dependant on Usa).
Or maybe they feared an afghanistan repeat (throwing military aid to a losing party)??
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I would say LM probably earn back that 40 billions from weapon sale alone, all thanks to Ukrainian Military.

Probably the one of the 2 company that comes out ahead, the other being Bayraktar
LM needs a whole truck of fine champagne for the annual meeting.

I guess Wall Street made a lot of money if not more than LM from the Euro exchange volatility.
 
West needs to step up and provide more then single digit military aid….if they want to end this faster instead of dragging this war on.

It is clear Putin digged himself in a hole. He cannot retreat back without something to show for. In meantime…Any alternative to his power did not step up (or simply fell out of a window). Save perhaps the Wagner leader which is even worse replacement for Putin.

The russians in the meantime act like good cannon fodder to the Tsar. Its insane to see them complaining and grumbling (not on the atrocities committed on their ukranian brothers but purely selfishly)…., but still form the next scout/wave to attack. It is clear 100.000 casualties is not enough to get some sense into them.

Stop sending this 1 MLRS here and there.
Give ukraine enough to fill several artillery brigades and pack them with cluster munition, long range munitions, full drone/radar/satellite intel.



EU is just being the hesitating, pacifistic, short sighted (next voting term!) bunch like so often. Which explains the weak reponse.

Usa seems to be more content to drag this out? It will demolish russia fully, weaken eu (and make them more dependant on Usa).
Or maybe they feared an afghanistan repeat (throwing military aid to a losing party)??
Watch out for Prigozhin, der chief of Wagner private hooligan group. He has direct access to Putin. He has direct access to Russia weapons stockpile. He has own army, the second largest.
Should anything happen to Putin, like falling down the stairs, Prigozhin could take over the Kremlin.

1671788339889.png
 
Can we stop acting like the taliban ran off Nato militarily or some other nonsense?

The coalition did not lose a single battle, and military losses were extremely low for controlling well more then half of a country with the geography and tribalism of afghanistan.

View attachment 907372

Taliban was actively avoiding fighting coalition head on. Their main strength was mainly patience and endurance. Knowing the europeans/americans never planned to stay their forever.

You know what is funny? that people actully believe in the casualty numbers the Americans have been presenting for the last 5-6 decades which is laughable and low IQ that some don't question it example these who consume mainstream media.

Example the Americans have been claiming around 10k to 20k KIA in Vietnam but decades later it was proven to be 200.000+ US KIA in action in that 10 year war.

What the Americans/NATO do is they hire their armed forces as private contractors so that they are not responsible for sharing casuality numbers..

To this day some actully believe Allied forces only lost 7k+ in Afghanistan which is extremely laughable where as the numbers released by the IEA is the real estimation which is around 150.000+ Allied forces + 300.000 ANA and ANP losses and on the other side around 500.000 IEA losses thru out the course of the 20 year conflict. These are the real realistic numbers but due to propaganda they will never release the true allied forces casualities because it would cause uproar but as you may know war does one thing which is kill combatants on all sides and the more there is engagements the more there is loss of life which is normal.

The 100.000 losses on both sides in the Ukraine war is realistic numbers. When you have a large conventional engagements across such a vaste lands casualities happen and if they didn't then whatever is happening there is not war but rather a movie is being shoot there.

There is a mathematical probabilities in conventional engagements when you factor in the amount of battles, lines, skirmishes, ambushes, counterattacks or offensives etc etc if you count the amount that occured in line with the numbers being presented in anywhere the US has been active is not only bullshxt but filmsy especially in Ukraine
 
Last edited:
Watch out for Prigozhin, der chief of Wagner private hooligan group. He has direct access to Putin. He has direct access to Russia weapons stockpile. He has own army, the second largest.
Should anything happen to Putin, like falling down the stairs, Prigozhin could take over the Kremlin.

View attachment 907384

I don't think his army is strong enough to takeover the Kremlin
 
(in Swedish)

Well the issue here is definitions. This would just be called "indecent dealing with a minor" in anglo countries, kind of stuff Scott Ritter did. Except that he didnt do it to a minor but to person he believed to be a minor.

Obviously the swedes take a hard line in dealing with such sickos.
 
I think there should be no M1 Abrams for ukraine yet. I dont think they are practical. Yes a couple of thousand of them if utilised properly would devastate the Russians, like totally devastate them, but you need massive logistics efforts to supply fuel for them to the front line and massive amounts of mechanics that are working out of harms way. and its just no doable. They are made for a modern highly equipped army. I would try to send every single Russian made tank that exists in europe first, and only after that start with French and then German tanks. Then if all else fails try with M1's if the capability to operate them exists.

We dot want to see massive amounts of M1's or Leopards in Russian hands. It looks bad and it will give Russians an insight onto sensitive technologies possibly.
 
One simple law: Do it mandatory to every dumbshit leader fight in every stupid war, and they will do their best to avoid wars, instead encourage it as cowards to receive fresh American dollars.

That's a good proposition, which if had taken place, Putin would have hardly dared to invade Ukraine, to begin with. Then, there would be no ensuing war of resistance and independence.

Common people who defend leaders hidden in bunkers as they and their families die for foreign interests doesnt respect themselves.

I do not think Russians are dying in foreign Ukraine for the sake of some foreign interests.

They are, at best, dying for a crony-capitalist authoritarian regime.

All the leading Russian figures families are safe and sound in their respective Western host nations.
 
Last edited:
It's ok, Zelensky is a better leader than Putin, or at least, more brave.

But if you die in the war, it doesnt matter to you. That war should never have happened.

It happens because Ukraine elite receive fresh American dollars.

Common people should not give a fck if their gov is under Moscow or Washington rule, they will get the same salary in the same jobs, and even if they are poorer under Moscow rule, it's better to be poor and alive, than rich and dead.

Brainwashed slaves seems to dont understand that money is not useful when you die.

I am pretty sure the Russian elite receive more USD than the Ukrainian elite.

This makes those Russians going out and dying in Ukraine suckers of the century.

Putin says Russia S300 is superior.
the US Patriot missile defense system is old, nothing to worry about. Russia will “knack” it. Putin, the optimist.

Ukraine troops will be trained in Germany on Patriot.



Putin speaks the truth.

For Putin, there's nothing to worry about.
 
Last edited:
Orcource apartheid state of Isra-el is highly unstable. It is a tiny rouge nation that receives at least 3.3$ aid from the USA. That is more than 9 million USD per day (Yes 9M$/day).
Basically, it is just a camp of the USA and Western powers in the middle east to keep busy with Arab and other Muslim countries. Once the USA withdraws its aid and support this bunch of white settlers cannot stand even for one week.
Funny thing, that Israelis were in the most crucial war, the 1st, alone on their feet, they had to take what the British left and buy from European/US scrap market and Czechslovakia with annoying circumstances.
The Arabs had better stuff left and were more.
The Americans were supporting Israel since 1960s, because Soviets did the same to Arabs before.
So both - the US and the USSR had their "useful idiots" to strengthen their influence.
Before the Americans the French were buddies with Israelis until 1967.
The Arabs couldn't fight a war without foreign help too, they would fight with spear & arrow again.
Can't produce 1 thing of value.
These tiny rogue state (your/many muslims, rightwings/leftists opinion) kicked Arabs left & right.
So Arabs are even more useless than weak tiny Kikes...




PS the US AID is spend on 74-76% on US made products.
Existence of Israel spares the US 150.000 fighting troops, you know how much money they save through small Israel?!
And the other 3/4 of the AID, the US has directy a word to say if they wanna have Israeli technology and to whom they wanna sell it.
Israel is used as a weapons dealer for countries which can't be delievered directly by the US bc of politics.
Israeli modifications of US equipment, especially F-16 & F-15 series saved US much money in improvements.
Give Arabs AID and they will buy & burn your flag.
I remember seeing Palestinians, who wouldn't be even born or at least surviving without EU/US aid and celebrating 9/11.
 
I think there should be no M1 Abrams for ukraine yet. I dont think they are practical. Yes a couple of thousand of them if utilised properly would devastate the Russians, like totally devastate them, but you need massive logistics efforts to supply fuel for them to the front line and massive amounts of mechanics that are working out of harms way. and its just no doable. They are made for a modern highly equipped army. I would try to send every single Russian made tank that exists in europe first, and only after that start with French and then German tanks. Then if all else fails try with M1's if the capability to operate them exists.

We dot want to see massive amounts of M1's or Leopards in Russian hands. It looks bad and it will give Russians an insight onto sensitive technologies possibly.

Given Pakistans current balance of payments and Foreign Exchange reserve issues, and stand off with IMF, maybe the Americans could use some of the aid money to purchase Pakistani T-80UD's and give them to Ukraine?

Pakistan can backfill the T-80UD's with Al-Khalid II's or VT-4's ? Everyone is a winner ....
 
Funny thing, that Israelis were in the most crucial war, the 1st, alone on their feet, they had to take what the British left and buy from European/US scrap market and Czechslovakia with annoying circumstances.
The Arabs had better stuff left and were more.
The Americans were supporting Israel since 1960s, because Soviets did the same to Arabs before.
So both - the US and the USSR had their "useful idiots" to strengthen their influence.
Before the Americans the French were buddies with Israelis until 1967.
The Arabs couldn't fight a war without foreign help too, they would fight with spear & arrow again.
Can't produce 1 thing of value.
These tiny rogue state (your/many muslims, rightwings/leftists opinion) kicked Arabs left & right.
So Arabs are even more useless than weak tiny Kikes...




Indeed .

Many here seems to make the mistake that the West helped Israel when it just got it's independence. That is not the case. In both are hardest wars - 48 and 67 , we stood alone with no foreign power supporting us ,

Very few countries agreed to provide us any weapons because of the arb oil embargo. France was an exception in 56 cause of their interest in the Suez canal , but they too stopped sending us the mirage planes after they where bought and paid for.

We practically had to build some of our planes from parts and pieces that where not under the embargo and some stolen blue prints of the mirage plane.


At the same time the soviets supplied the Arab countries with anything they wanted.


Only after 67, when the Americans realized we can stand on our feet and fend for ourselves , did they agree to sell us weapons - like the F-4 fighter pane they started to deliver in 1968.

~
 
Last edited:

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom