What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

.
Russia will spend $143 billion for military and security next year. 30 percent of total gov budget. That’s too little if the war continues next year. Should the oil price crash as expected, China buys less, then good luck.


Do they call it a war yet or is it still a special operation, that required them to double their defense budget?
 
.
Do they call it a war yet or is it still a special operation, that required them to double their defense budget?
Still special military ops shit. Calling war as war is a serious offense to Russia army and will carry a prison term of 15y in Russia. Russia army is considered as God. They are immune, they can go on killing, raping. Any critics is considered as blasphemy.
 
. .
To understand how hypocritical and liars Putin's Russians are.
Kherson is supposed to be "Russian" because the people voted to join Russia. But due to Russian defeats, Russia retreated, Kherson was liberated, and thousands of residents celebrated.

Nevertheless.... for two weeks now, Kherson has been leveled by Russia, Mariupol recalls, apparently the Russian invaders are punishing its inhabitants.

 
.

>> The Americans now will not stop Ukraine from striking more targets in mainland Russia following Russian attacks on civilian infrastrcture ... Expect things to get more roasty for the Russians.. Russia's attacks on Ukranian civilian infra has opened up more types of weapons deliveres to Ukraine...

The Pentagon gave tacit consent to Ukraine's long-range strikes against targets on Russian territory after President Putin's numerous missile strikes against critical infrastructure in Kyiv. The British publication The Times writes about this with reference to sources from the U.S. Department of Defense.​


The publication notes that since the Russian Federation began regular attacks against the civilian population of Ukraine in October, the Pentagon has revised its assessment of the threat of war in Ukraine. It now includes new considerations about whether arms supplies to Kyiv could lead to a military confrontation between Russia and NATO. Now Washington is more inclined to supply Kyiv with longer-range weapons, the publication writes.

"We still use the same escalation calculations, but the fear of escalation has changed from the very beginning. Now everything is different. This is because the calculations of the war have changed due to the suffering and brutality that the Ukrainians are experiencing at the hands of the Russians," a source in the defense authority of the United States told the publication.

Washington is now less concerned that new strikes with long-range weapons on Russian territory could lead to a dramatic escalation. So far, all of Moscow's retaliatory strikes have been associated with conventional missile strikes on civilian targets.

Previously, the Pentagon was afraid of Ukraine's attacks against Russia, because it was afraid that the Kremlin would respond either with tactical nuclear weapons or strike neighboring NATO countries.

At the same time, Washington does not want it to be seen that Kyiv has publicly received a "green light" for attacks on Russian territory. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced Washington's position this week. He said that "we did not encourage and did not allow Ukrainians to strike inside Russia."

However, a source in the U.S. Department of Defense noted: "We are not telling Kyiv: 'Don't strike at the Russians (in Russia or Crimea. - Ed.).” We cannot tell them what to do. They decide for themselves how to use their weapons. But when they use weapons supplied by us, the only thing we insist on is that the Ukrainian military adhere to the international laws of war and the Geneva Conventions," said the interlocutor of the publication.

"These are the only restrictions, but they include the absence of attacks on Russian families and murders. As far as we understand, Ukraine complies with these requirements," the interlocutor added.

If the U.S. decides to supply Ukraine with longer-range weapons that can strike deep into Russian territory, fears of a possible escalation could rise sharply. However, Pentagon officials have made it clear that Kyiv's request for longer-range American weapons, including missiles and fighter-bombers that can be used for even more effective strikes inside Russia or occupied Crimea, is being seriously considered.

"Nothing is excluded," said a senior official of the U.S. Department of Defense.
 
. .
. . . . . . .
Dude, did you just figure that out??

It's is of course a proxy war from the West, or you think they really care whether or not Ukraine align to the West? A country with 200 billion GDP pre-war? I said that time and again, the sitaution in Ukraine is created so Sweden and Finland would join NATO. And Russia is stupid enough to help NATO along. This is of course a proxy war.

The fact remained; Russia is losing this proxy war.


The entire EU is facing a shortage of energy this winter and there are endless demonstrations throughout the whole of the EU. Yet you consider this war a loss for Russia when they killed over 130,000 cannon fodder Ukrainian troops and wounded over 300,000 Ukrainian troops?

To the Russians, this is a war to defend the Russian-speaking communities in Donbas and Southern Ukraine while , at the same time, bringing Ukraine and the whole of the EU to its knees. If anything, Russians are carrying out a grinding war that is fracturing the whole EU and Western alliance.

Stop chatting sh-t as usual.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom