Well that too depends..... economy actually does play a primary role, which in turn can fuel either an aggressive foreign policy (if you wish so), or a timid one (if you don't have the balls). You people have already crossed 8 out of 10 thresh-hold-markers to be a great power, now it rests squarely in your court what you want to do with it!
If you want to go with an aggressive policy, go for the following..... your economy and technological know-how can already support it... it's just a matter of willpower:
1. Build at least 10 carrier strike groups.
2. Mature your stealth air platforms.
3. You are lagging technologically on second strike platform (quiet submarines) dedicated all your efforts.
4. Increase the number of nukes to 10,000+ (you certainly had the time to do it) 4000 strategic + 6000 tactical.
5. Your missiles are mature. No need there.
6. Dedicate your efforts on various ABM platforms..
You can certainly do all of the above within a decade... there is no other nation on the planet at the moment who can do something similar other than the US.... once you have teeth, then EVERYTHING else falls in-place automatically. You don't need to go threaten anyone.... who would dare attack someone with the above gizmos?
People are wrong when they give ranking "tags" to nations. Pecking order is actually automatic, whosoever can kick the crap out of the one below (-) is ranked + on the other.... so stop worrying about semantics, work hard on the economy and put the money to good use... i.e.... increase the size and lethality of your fangs....
Russia is widely consiered as a country more powerful than china.Economy is just a small part of power.How many time is the economy of song bigger than mongol tribes?probably thounsands of times,but still song is the shamelessly weaker one.