What's new

Russia Pressurized China To Release Indian Soldiers, End Border Conflict With India

China got rude awakening when they were supported only by nepal and pakistan, while india was supported by USA, russia, japan, australia, france.
1) Japan and Australia are nothing Military wise
2) Russia is trade partner of India as it has to sell its weapons to India, but not Indian Ally
3) I don't know why you included France in your list even it has not trade partner of India, may be for Rafale deal
4) US only attack on tiny countries and for India it will not face China, even Pakistan will not help it in its proxy war like it did in Soviet era with Russia...
5) US only show its muscle in South China Sea, And it already struck in Afghanistan, No possibility it will try to attack any big country, it can only attack tiny countries..
 
. .
1) Japan and Australia are nothing Military wise
2) Russia is trade partner of India as it has to sell its weapons to India, but not Indian Ally
3) I don't know why you included France in your list even it has not trade partner of India, may be for Rafale deal
4) US only attack on tiny countries and for India it will not face China, even Pakistan will not help it in its proxy war like it did in Soviet era with Russia...
5) US only show its muscle in South China Sea, And it already struck in Afghanistan, No possibility it will try to attack any big country, it can only attack tiny countries..
1. Japan and Australia are enough military wise to defend their territory of interests. By that logic what is nepal and pakistan military wise ?
2. One will sell weapons to a friend not a foe.
3. France does stands up for india in UNSC and many other international forums. Thats common knowledge you should have, before questioning france.
4. India dont need USA to teach china a lesson. And its proved twice now, first in doklam and now in ladakh.
5. Again whats your point there ? and US is omni present everywhere in the world, it has almost got china encircled. And no its no stuck in afghanistan.
 
.
1. Japan and Australia are enough military wise to defend their territory of interests. By that logic what is nepal and pakistan military wise ?
2. One will sell weapons to a friend not a foe.
3. France does stands up for india in UNSC and many other international forums. Thats common knowledge you should have, before questioning france.
4. India dont need USA to teach china a lesson. And its proved twice now, first in doklam and now in ladakh.
5. Again whats your point there ? and US is omni present everywhere in the world, it has almost got china encircled. And no its no stuck in afghanistan.

1) Can Japan & Australia defend Indian territory ? Japan & South Korea always begs US to save them from N. Korea.
Pakistan is Nuclear country..
2) What France did for you in recently clashes with China ?
3) Then why US was begging Pakistan for Talks with Taliban ?
(2018 article:)
https://www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/us-asks-pakistan-facilitate-afghan-taliban-peace-talks
 
.
1. Japan and Australia are enough military wise to defend their territory of interests. By that logic what is nepal and pakistan military wise ?
2. One will sell weapons to a friend not a foe.
3. France does stands up for india in UNSC and many other international forums. Thats common knowledge you should have, before questioning france.
4. India dont need USA to teach china a lesson. And its proved twice now, first in doklam and now in ladakh.
5. Again whats your point there ? and US is omni present everywhere in the world, it has almost got china encircled. And no its no stuck in afghanistan.
Calm down. Keep your nara on. Many countries are gladly egging Hindustan on because it has one thing these industrialised nations don't - dumb hordes of willing sacrificial lambs. India will continue to be used and abused against China and Pakistan, the two nations whose alliance is the real threat to western interests.
 
.
1) Can Japan & Australia defend Indian territory ? Japan & South Korea always begs US to save them from N. Korea.
Pakistan is Nuclear country..
2) What France did for you in recently clashes with China ?
3) Then why US was begging Pakistan for Talks with Taliban ?
(2018 article:)
https://www.voanews.com/south-central-asia/us-asks-pakistan-facilitate-afghan-taliban-peace-talks
1. India will defend its territory, japan and australia will defend their territory.By your logic were you expecting nepal to protect china against india ?
2. Were you expecting france to send its soldiers to india and fly their rafales over china ? If yes, why ?
3. Again where is the proof they are stuck ? Its difficult to pin down a superpower in a small territory, when they have military bases all around the world and aircraft carriers roaming everywhere they want.

Calm down. Keep your nara on. Many countries are gladly egging Hindustan on because it has one thing these industrialised nations don't - dumb hordes of willing sacrificial lambs. India will continue to be used and abused against China and Pakistan, the two nations whose alliance is the real threat to western interests.
hmmm talking of sacrificial lambs, imran khan has different view
Khan said, "but they came here and killed him, martyred him and ... used abusive language against us (and) did not inform us (of the raid), despite the fact that we lost 70,000 people in the war on terror."
https://www.dw.com/en/pakistan-imran-khan-says-us-martyred-osama-bin-laden/a-53944280
 
.
hmmm talking of sacrificial lambs, imran khan has different view
We will fight Hindustan and Hindustani agents for the very existence of our quom and our way of life. Our fight is existential - one of our nations (or both) will be terminated. Both India and Pakistan cannot survive because the traumas of hindutva have pushed us closer to nuclear annihilation than ever before.

Now, why are India fighting China? India is NOWHERE NEAR being China's economic rival, so don't make me laugh there. Why is your nation of street decorators being egged on towards the northern border? Did daddy Trump instruct you because he needs someone to sabotage CPEC for him. The poster you're responding to is correct - these western nations aren't even stupid enough to fight Iran. And you think they'll take China on? Or come to your aid against them?

India is and always has been someone else's tool. The great thing is, because of your historical "inferiority complex" and the humiliation of 1962, you lot are willing to be used in this way.


2:45 "historical trauma" of 1962, as reported by an Indian origin reporter for The Economist. At least some Indians have some grasp of reality.

3:33 "national inferiority complex"

Pakistan and India have good reasons to want to destroy each other. As for Modi, the loss of 20+ jawans and strategic territory in Ladakh will simply add to the "inferiority complex" that's already there. It's a bit of a catch 22 really.
 
.
We will fight Hindustan and Hindustani agents for the very existence of our quom and our way of life. Our fight is existential - one of our nations (or both) will be terminated. Both India and Pakistan cannot survive because the traumas of hindutva have pushed us closer to nuclear annihilation than ever before.
No comments.
Now, why are India fighting China? India is NOWHERE NEAR being China's economic rival, so don't make me laugh there. Why is your nation of street decorators being egged on towards the northern border? Did daddy Trump instruct you because he needs someone to sabotage CPEC for him. The poster you're responding to is correct - these western nations aren't even stupid enough to fight Iran. And you think they'll take China on? Or come to your aid against them?
India is not yet fighting china, there is no war yet, and now there is de-escalation of posturing as well.
India by the way is fighting expansionist design of china and will keep fighting it until china gives up its expansionists policies. It had to fall back from doklam, now from ladakh and in future same will be happening.
India is and always has been someone else's tool. The great thing is, because of your historical "inferiority complex" and the humiliation of 1962, you lot are willing to be used in this way.
Well, talking about being used, lets see , its not india who was used as a pawn by usa to fight russia in afghanistan. Its not india who was given ultimatum either you are with us or against us and made subservient in their own land . Its not india who had to toe the policy of using drones to kill their own citizens. Its not india whom uae things its fair to punish coz india did not side with their war in other middle east country. Its not indian PM who had to stand up in parliament and accept that 70000 people had to give up their lives for war on terror which usa wanted. And again its not indian pm who had to stand up in parliament to accept that usa insulted us and killed osama bin laden.
 
.
No comments.

India is not yet fighting china, there is no war yet, and now there is de-escalation of posturing as well.
India by the way is fighting expansionist design of china and will keep fighting it until china gives up its expansionists policies. It had to fall back from doklam, now from ladakh and in future same will be happening.

Well, talking about being used, lets see , its not india who was used as a pawn by usa to fight russia in afghanistan. Its not india who was given ultimatum either you are with us or against us and made subservient in their own land . Its not india who had to toe the policy of using drones to kill their own citizens. Its not india whom uae things its fair to punish coz india did not side with their war in other middle east country. Its not indian PM who had to stand up in parliament and accept that 70000 people had to give up their lives for war on terror which usa wanted. And again its not indian pm who had to stand up in parliament to accept that usa insulted us and killed osama bin laden.
You do know who won in Afg between USSR and Pakistani proxies right?

As for the "war on terror", Pakistan will win its war against Indian terror proxies at any cost.

Your interpretations of events on your northern border are purely subjective. Even pro-Indian sources, such as the BBC article posted earlier, suggest otherwise.
 
.
You do know who won in Afg between USSR and Pakistani proxies right?

As for the "war on terror", Pakistan will win its war against Indian terror proxies at any cost.

Your interpretations of events on your northern border are purely subjective. Even pro-Indian sources, such as the BBC article posted earlier, suggest otherwise.
Pro Indian source and BBC ?
Okay i think thats enough conversation for me for today.
 
.
Simply ask yourself and your government, why - if India "won" this engagement - has India today been forced to retreat in Indian territory by the terms of this supposed "withdrawal agreement"?

China, Modi and everyone else is making fools of the Indian voters - China took ten steps forwards, now India is being asked to take a further step back voluntarily just because China has also, and India "declares victory". Everything is actually going precisely to China's plan.

You world's biggest democrashhy losers get to "save face". Modi gets to win another election after this "victory against China", China took Indian territory and still forced India back within Indian territory to create a DMZ. And now, India cannot complain about its lost territory because apparently "India won".

The losers here are the families of 20 dead jawans who died for a loss of territory and nothing more.
 
.
The only thing I learnt from this thread was that for two years in a row other countries have had to try and get India's humilated and captured soldiers back:lol:


They must be thinking"what, again?"
Imagine what those countries are thinking about the Indian supa paws

Then having got indian hostages back, they have to watch Indians declare victory:cheesy::rofl::rofl:


Modi and Indian army have made india badnam:lol:
 
. .
So the article is really saying that India is an impotent Supa powa that needs the help of Russia??

No wonder Pakistan trashed India in the last military clash... They are weaklings..


Every year they have to get someone to help them get their soldiers back...

I'm not sure they have any shame left:coffee:
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom