Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
your argument come down to the fact that Ukraine have HIMARS and can destroy Russia supply near battlefield , Russia does not have such system and can't disrupt Ukraine supply near battle field.What come down to HIMARS?
This is about offensive logistic and defensive logistic, you have a longer more predictable and more demanding logistic when you are attacking, and you have a more robust, shorter logistic when you are defending. This is the basic principle for battlefield logistic since maybe Roman time.
well to me the problem is more about upto date battlefield awareness a nd information gathering that Russia can't disrupt Ukraine supply not HIMARS . NATO is simply better than Russia in this regard