What's new

Russia building first class of carriers since 1991 when Russian nationalists led by Yeltsin regained

.
If the have the capability to destroy the target on standoff ranges like Mediterranean sea and black sea (stand off Cruise Missiles) why do they need this super expensive ship

Cruise missiles can only target static targets. Aircraft are needed to take out small mobile targets. That's why they need to use Ka-52K carrier based attack helicopters on these ships to hammer terrorist pickup trucks and mobile units from the coast.

 
.
Cruise missiles can only target static targets. Aircraft are needed to take out small mobile targets. That's why they need to use Ka-52K carrier based attack helicopters on these ships to hammer terrorist pickup trucks and mobile units from the coast.

Su-25 could do the same job as well as old MI-24/35/ Su-24 and UCAV:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: this ship main mission is not what you think:crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
. .
It saves fuel to fly from carriers off the coast than to fly from airbases all the way from Russia. Fuel is money.
:lol::lol::lol::lol: What a fool you're and this ship will not using fuel, according to you this ship will not use fuel but run on fart, good going and keep going:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::enjoy:
 
.
:lol::lol::lol::lol: What a fool you're and this ship will not using fuel, according to you this ship will not use fuel but run on fart, good going and keep going:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::enjoy:

The ship is stationary once it arrives off the coast. Flying 1000 sorties from airbase in Russia uses far more fuel than sailing the ship to the coast and then flying 1000 sorties from the ship.
 
.
The ship is stationary once it arrives off the coast. Flying 1000 sorties from airbase in Russia uses far more fuel than sailing the ship to the coast and then flying 1000 sorties from the ship.
Dude, Russia does not even have enough money to develop their Su-57 (they previously relied on the Indians for financial support). What in the world makes you think they have the money to build multi billion dollars LHDs that serve very little purpose. Do you not know they have numerous air bases in Syria?
 
.
Dude, Russia does not even have enough money to develop their Su-57 (they previously relied on the Indians for financial support). What in the world makes you think they have the money to build multi billion dollars LHDs that serve very little purpose. Do you not know they have numerous air bases in Syria?

The two LHDs are already laid down earlier this month. The money has already been paid to the shipyard workers. Su-57 is under serial production. If they need more money the Russian government can simply print the money the same way the US government prints the money it needs to use.
 
.
The ship is stationary once it arrives off the coast. Flying 1000 sorties from airbase in Russia uses far more fuel than sailing the ship to the coast and then flying 1000 sorties from the ship.
Another fool statement by you This ship uses Diesel engine which consume more diesel than Turbofan equipped jets, and Seaway to Syria from Russia Than airways From Russia to Syria, now shoo and think logically
 
.
Another fool statement by you This ship uses Diesel engine which consume more diesel than Turbofan equipped jets, and Seaway to Syria from Russia Than airways From Russia to Syria, now shoo and think logically
Just stop arguing with the Russian fan boy ... it is of no use.
 
. .
Another fool statement by you This ship uses Diesel engine which consume more diesel than Turbofan equipped jets, and Seaway to Syria from Russia Than airways From Russia to Syria, now shoo and think logically

Haha, your favourite buddy is back :enjoy:
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom