What's new

Russia and China veto UN Resolution against Syria

I don't find any thing wrong, to be frank its good that China and Russia vetoed against the resolution.
if this resolution is passed then there is a posibility that the NATO forces might do some thing like in Libiya and bring more suffering to the people of Syria more than what Azad is bringing to his own people.
And on moral grounds its good that Azad steps down and calls for election rather than having this issue burning and consuming the country as whole.
so what is the solution in your point of view to stop the massacre there?
 
thankyou russia and china once again.

its always a great day when that evil american regime and its puppets lose.

humiliated those evil bastards.
is it worth using harsh and unparlimentary words to even describe your enemies. kindly refrain from doing so proving yourself a gentleman of great stature.
 
Living in the US you would know the media bashes the local government more than it does China. Do you think this should also stoped? Or just news relating to China? The ability to criticize the government is cornerstone to progression and advancement. This has nothing to do with imperialism, unless of course you think the Arab League is a secret Zionist society.

blah blah blah.

shoo imperialist.....shoo
 
Just heard the news that all countries other than Russia and China supported the resolution.

If true, then it is very disappointing on the part of Russia and China to have done so when Assad is clearly killing hundreds of people just so he could secure his office.

This is plain shameful.
 
so what is the solution in your point of view to stop the massacre there?
now that Russia and China are more close to the rulling government in Syria, they should be able to persuade Azad or his military officials to stop the killing and suffering and that Azad should step down. Its now in the hands of Russia and China to diplomatically deal with Azad and his supprting staff
 
so what is the solution in your point of view to stop the massacre there?

Well, I don't know if what I'm going to say will stop the massacre or not, but you can go there and fight along your Syrian brothers against the tyranny of Assad and hopefully get martyred too Inshallah. (I'm kidding around Hussein ;) )
 
Just heard the news that all countries other than Russia and China supported the resolution.

If true, then it is very disappointing on the part of Russia and China to have done so when Assad is clearly killing hundreds of people just so he could secure his office.

This is plain shameful.

what a gullible tool.
only russia and china are powerful enough to vote against it.
all other countries are too weak to vote against it and survive.
india and others are too weak to go against the west.
to go against the west, u must be powerful like russia and china.

Yes teach the Arab League a lesson.

there is no such thing as arab league, its an american league named 'arab'.

---------- Post added at 12:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 AM ----------

US - Iran - Ideal - Syria - Libya Update - YouTube
 
Unfortunately, the benign circumstances that were present in Libya is not present in Syria:

- The Syrian opposition is weak, does not control any territory, and the fighting is carried out in dense urban terrain.
- There are no tanks and supply lines in the desert that can be easily targeted from the air.
- There's no UNSC resolution.
- The Syrian population is split between ethnic group and different neighbor countries have conflicting stakes and are almost sure to get involved at some point.

Now that the UN option has been exhausted, prepare for more intensive proxy wars inside Syria to boost the opposition.
 
what a gullible tool.
only russia and china are powerful enough to vote against it.
all other countries are too weak to vote against it and survive.
india and others are too weak to go against the west.
to go against the west, u must be powerful like russia and china.
if that is your prespective than you are indeed wrong. no one influences the other when the voting comes in UN. perticularly developing countries like INDIA, BRAZIL, SA, have their own agenda. the resolution was supported by the INDIANS on humanitarian grounds and not because US asked us.
 
ThankYou! Russia and China for saving the poor pplz of Syria from the brutal massacre of the US/NATO hegemony......long live You guyz and always try to help/save the weak and needy countries from the Western butchers and thugz....:china::)
 
if that is your prespective than you are indeed wrong. no one influences the other when the voting comes in UN. perticularly developing countries like INDIA, BRAZIL, SA, have their own agenda. the resolution was supported by the INDIANS on humanitarian grounds and not because US asked us.

get real man.

u think india or anyone not named russia or china would survive the critisism and pressure put on by the western regimes?
HELL NO!

india, pakistan, brazil, south africa, etc are not strong enough to vote against the west and survive.

u gotta have a thick skin and balls to go against the west, russia and and china have that, none of the others have that.

russia and china are too powerful to be controlled by the west, others are to various degress controlled by the west.
if they ever go against the west, the western nations will make sure they crush them in various ways economically, politically, diplomatically, financially.

russia and china are the only 2 countries capable of not get bullied around by the american empire.
 
Did they save or made thyem suffer? time will only tell. anyways wish good luck Syrians...they suffer the most.
 
The Syrian public shold not become the puppets of the US/NATO and fight against their own people or military....:smokin:
 
Back
Top Bottom