Mr AN, you are constantly shifting your goalpost.
First, you thought that IA should be criticized for their supposed failure in Naxal hit areas of India, exactly as PA is being criticized for their failure in SWAT. What you didn't realise was that IA was never involved in dealing with the Naxals, in the first place. Therefore criticizing IA for their imaginary failure in something that they were never involved, doesn't even arise. If criticism is to be made, regarding Red Corridor, then it is to be directed at the State govts. and local political outfits who do not hesitate to take the Naxal's help for their own political interest.
When you were explained why IA never got involved, you changed your stance assuming that the Indian constitution and legal system somehow apply to Pakistan also. If Pakistan is involving their army to solve a state level(?) problem, then India should do too.
When the absurdity was pointed out to you, together with the fact that Naxal problem doesn't come close to being same as SWAT, you started equating the two conflicts on the basis of the size of the effected area. It, somehow escaped your understanding that the issues involved are so different from each other, that size just doesn't matter. While SWAT, is a result of a religious ideology that is no longer a local headache, but a global ulcer, the Naxal problem is a political movement that revolves around the issue of development or lack of it, and it continues to be a local one.
Naxal problem is not swept under the carpet. It is a burning issue in regional politics of Bengal, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh. But yes, it stays largely out of focus from international media, for obvious reasons.
Your lack of understanding of the intricacies of local politics is appalling.
However, I agree that the letter was tongue in cheek. A subtle way to give the middle finger to the PA.