Remembering India’s Forgotten Holocaust

[Luca1]

its sad that many Indians die in famine. But to compare a famine to haulocaust is disgusting. Did Churchill systematically killed Hindu Indians by sending them to death camps? No. Did he have a plan to get rid of South Asia of Hindu as a race? No. Famine occurred time to time, such as the great Irish famine. But because of bad policies that caused famine does mean that the leader during the time of famine should be compared to Hitler. To do so is a total disregard to the victims of Haulocaust. I will stop responding as many of you Indians are trying to get sympathy by stating you were treated like the Jews during WWII and no one in the world will buy your bull crap. You guys are sick and disgusting for pulling this crappy stunt against a great statesman.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

its sad that many Indians die in famine. But to compare a famine to haulocaust is disgusting. Did Churchill systematically killed Hindu Indians by sending them to death camps? No. Did he have a plan to get rid of South Asia of Hindu as a race? No. Famine occurred time to time, such as the great Irish famine. But because of bad policies that caused famine does mean that the leader during the time of famine should be compared to Hitler. To do so is a total disregard to the victims of Haulocaust. I will stop responding as many of you Indians are trying to get sympathy by stating you were treated like the Jews during WWII and no one in the world will buy your bull crap. You guys are sick and disgusting for pulling this crappy stunt against a great statesman.

We do not need you fake tears you filth. Keep them to yourself.

The "famine" was man made, not natural. Bengal where it happened is a river delta, not an african dry land. It is one of the MOST fertile land in the world with waters fed from two mighty perennial rivers, Ganga and Brahmaputra. To compare that to Irish famine is again shows how truly shameless you are.

The famine occurred because first the british forced Indians to grow cotton and indigo to supply their mills in england and then when Indians grew food, they were all looted away to be stockpiled in UK while Indians starved. It was a deliberate and malicious strategy. Not any random act of fate or ignorant policy. Everybody knew what was happening and no one did a thing. Exactly like the nazis and the jews.

Churchill did systematically attempt to kill the Hindus by starving them to death. This is now part of public record. Those people would have been better off in a death camp. At least they would have got a decent burial, instead they became food for scavengers, denied dignity even in death.

We do not need sympathy from a shameless race like yours. Sympathy is for the weak, when our time comes the world will listen. We will make sure of that. Till then you can wallow in your own lies. Make the best of it since your time is almost up.

 

[jbond197]

^^^
The person you are responding to is a Chinese troll.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

^^^
The person you are responding to is a Chinese troll.

Thanks for pointing that out. Sun tzu and all that

 

[Shinigami]

.... not to mention that this event happened in bangladesh, not india

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

.... not to mention that this event happened in bangladesh, not india

Also India. The Bengal part is well know (including west bengal), the famine and shortage of food in rest of India is not highlighted by history. You dig deep enough and you realize that almost all of India (including pakistan and BD) suffered due to this.

 

[Shinigami]

Also India. The Bengal part is well know (including west bengal), the famine and shortage of food in rest of India is not highlighted by history. You dig deep enough and you realize that almost all of India (including pakistan and BD) suffered due to this.

yes but the deaths largely occurred in bangladesh

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

yes but the deaths largely occurred in bangladesh

..so nobody died in the rest of India due to starvation ? what about West Bengal ?

Here is the food price Index of those days, do you understand what that data represents ?

It basically means food was not available in most parts of India due to looting and food stockpiling by the british. Those who could not afford food, just starved to death. It was pan India.

 

[abjktu]

By trivializing the genocide in India which killed twice as many Hindus as Jews.

What is truly disgusting is your inability or unwillingness to call Hindu deaths Haulocaust.

you are still dragging religion into it..Shame on you...Churchill hated all Indians,not just Hindus alone..
The then Bengal province had sizeable amount of Muslims too..All Indians in that province were equally affected by this artificial famine created by the British..But for you narrow minded peoples it was just British vs Hindus..

 

[TejasMk3]

.... not to mention that this event happened in bangladesh, not india

1769-1770 - Great Bengal Famine Bihar, Northern and Central Bengal - deaths -10 million(about one third of the then population of Bengal)

1782–83 Madras city and surrounding areas Kingdom of Mysore

1783–84 Chalisa famineDelhi, Western Oudh, Eastern Punjab region, Rajputana, and KashmirSevere famine. Large areas were depopulated. - Up to 11 million people may have died during the years 1782–84.

1791–92 Doji bara famine or Skull famine Hyderabad, Southern Maratha country,Deccan, Gujarat, and Marwar One of the most severe famines known. People died in such numbers that they could not be cremated or buried. It is thought that 11 million people may have died during the years 1788–94.

1837–38 Agra famine of 1837–38 Central Doab and trans-Jumna districts of the North-Western Provinces (later Agra Province), including Delhi and Hissar deaths:800,000.

1860–61 Upper Doab famine of 1860–61 Upper Doab of Agra; Delhi and Hissar divisions of the PunjabEastern Rajputana - 2 million.

1865–67Orissa famine of 1866 Orissa (also 1867) and Bihar; Bellary and Ganjam districts of Madras 1 million (814,469 in Orissa, 135,676 in Bihar and 10,898 in Ganjam)

1868–70Rajputana famine of 1869 Ajmer, Western Agra, Eastern Punjab Rajputana -1.5 million (mostly in the princely states of Rajputana)

1873–74 Bihar famine of 1873–74 Bihar An extensive relief effort was organized by the Bengal government. There were little to none significant mortalities during the famine.

1876–78Great Famine of 1876–78 (also Southern India famine of 1876–78)Madras and BombayMysore and Hyderabad5.5 million in British territory.[6] Mortality unknown for princely states. Total famine mortality estimates vary from 6.1 to 10.3 million.

1888–89Ganjam, Orissa and North Bihar150,000 deaths in Ganjam. Deaths were due to starvation as famine relief was not provided in time.
1896–97 Indian famine of 1896–97 Madras, Bombay Deccan, Bengal, United Provinces, Central ProvincesNorthern and eastern Rajputana, parts of Central India and Hyderabad5 million in British territory.

1899–1900 Indian famine of 1899–1900 Bombay, Central Provinces, Berar, AjmerHyderabad, Rajputana, Central India, Baroda, Kathiawar, Cutch,1 million (in British territories). Mortality unknown for princely states.

1905–06 Bombay Bundelkhand 235,062 in Bombay (of which 28,369 attributed to Cholera). Mortality unknown for Bundelkhand.

1943–44 Bengal famine of 1943 Bengal 1.5 million from starvation; 3.5 million including deaths from epidemics.

Timeline of major famines in India during British rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As you can see they were all over India.

 

[Luca1]

according to your countryman, you just listed all instances of British holocaust in India.

 

[Shinigami]

according to your countryman, you just listed all instances of British holocaust in India.

the british did this in your country as well. boxer rebellion i believe?

 

[INDIC]

according to your countryman, you just listed all instances of British holocaust in India.

Seems you also cheerlead how British fed opium to your population.

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

you are still dragging religion into it..Shame on you...Churchill hated all Indians,not just Hindus alone..
The then Bengal province had sizeable amount of Muslims too..All Indians in that province were equally affected by this artificial famine created by the British..But for you narrow minded peoples it was just British vs Hindus..

It was Churchill your fellow christian who mentioned Hindus you fcuking moron. Go read the discussion above before jumping like a money to celebrate your victory. Now you psychotic troll stop following me around like a whipped dog. Stop destroying this thread to satisfying your ego you troll.

 

[abjktu]

It was Churchill your fellow christian who mentioned Hindus you fcuking moron. Go read the discussion above before jumping like a money to celebrate your victory. Now you psychotic troll stop following me around like a whipped dog. Stop destroying this thread to satisfying your ego you troll.

Looks like,No non Hindus were starved or died in that famine??...Lakhs of Muslims and other minorities were also died in that famine...
Here the word Hindu means Indians..Even today for many outsider nations India means Hindu and they treat each and every Indians as Hindus irrespective of their faith..But you dimwits are giving religious angle to each and every thing without proper reasoning..No wonder,How could we expect sense from a f Shiva sena troll like you??