Railway catering scam: 100gm curd for ₹972, refined oil for ₹1,241 a litre

[ranjeet]

Divorce rate among Muslims low compared to other communities: Report

Source: http://indianexpress.com/article/in...compared-to-other-communities-report-4605196/

So please get back with some other sh!t

Yo do know that this link also quotes the same survey?

These figures were from the eight districts of Kannur (Kerala), Nasik (Maharashtra), Karimnagar (Telangana), Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), Secunderabad (Hyderabad), Malappuram (Kerala), Ernakulam (Kerala) and Palakkad (Kerala).

What a way to be apologetic about triple talaq ! Clearly the SC didn't rebuke the Govt for its stand on TT

Moreover this case is related to widows of Vrindawan and Mathura, some NGO filed a PIL back in 2007 but it's being presented as if SC is talking about widows all over India. These Triple talaq apologists would do anything to hide the dirt under the carpet.

 

[IndoCarib]

Divorce rate among Muslims low compared to other communities: Report

Source: http://indianexpress.com/article/in...compared-to-other-communities-report-4605196/

So please get back with some other sh!t

How can it be divorce 'rate' ? It is definitely not divorce per 100 women.

The data you posted is only a comparison between the number of Divorced Hindu women whose population is obviously much more in these districts and divorced Muslim women whose population is low. Ranjeet's post proves that

 

[ranjeet]

Railway catering scam: 100gm curd for ₹972, refined oil for ₹1,241 a litre

• 
  The details pertain to items purchased and stocked at the warehouse in CSTM (Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus) and distributed to the IRCTC's Jan Ahar canteens, railway base kitchens and trains such as the Deccan Queen and the Kurla-Hazrat Nizamuddin Express.
  
  Mr. Bose alleged that the railways were incurring losses due to such scams. “I was provided with details after a long wait, and information for only a few months was shared though I had wanted it for a full year. Commodities like chicken with bone, tur dal, moong dal, besan and even tissue paper have been purchased at inflated costs.”
  
  As per the reply, other commodities procured by the railways included 58 litres of refined oil for ₹72,034 in March 2016, or a litre of refined oil for ₹1,241. It also bought 150 packets of Tata Salt for ₹2,670, or ₹49 a packet instead of its then MRP of ₹15, water bottles and soft drinks were for ₹59 a bottle.
  
  A few items, including samosas, onions and potatoes, however, were procured at the correct rates.
  
  Stock mismatch
  The RTI reply also revealed a distribution mismatch. While 250 kg of flour was purchased for ₹7,680, the railways claimed to have distributed 450 kg of flour (90 kg to base kitchen and 360 kg to the IRCTC-run Jan Ahar canteens). Similarly, 35 kg of maida was shown as distributed, though only 20 kg was purchased. It also bought 255 kg of Basmati rice, but said it distributed 745 kg to the base kitchen and the Kurla-Hazrat Nizamuddin Express.
  
  “According to the railway reports, the Jan Ahar Canteens and stalls at LTT [Lokmanya Tilak Terminus] and other stations are running at a loss, but the RTI reply gives us the actual picture,” Mr. Bose said.
  
  Divisional Railway Manager of the Central Railway Ravindra Goyal said, “This must be a typing error, but I will look into the matter.”
  
  Subodh Jain, former General Manager of the Central Railway, said, “There is a proper channel for purchasing these items. The purchase committee finalise the rates.”
  
  Requesting anonimity, a senior railway official from New Delhi who has worked closely with the Central Railway, said, “This cannot be happen on paper as there are some scandals in the past in which CSTM catering was at fault. Every year, the railways show loss in crores of rupees, and the reason is such scams. These need to be looked into seriously.”
  
  Subhash Gupta, member, Zonal Railway Users Consultative Committee (ZRUCC) and its president, Rail Pravasi Sangh, said, “This is a very serious issue and needs to be looked into by senior railway authorities. So many items being purchased at higher costs and a difference in procurement and distribution cannot be typing mistakes. This has been happening since long and passengers are always the losers. Due to such scams, the railways claims it is running at a loss, increases fares and decreases passenger amenities. Action should be taken against the officials involved.”

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities...ined-oil-for-1241-a-litre/article18348422.ece

Here is the truth about this scam from a neutral source .... 3 Railway employees were suspended for the error.
Rs. 972 For A Packet Of Curd? No, But 3 Railway Officers Still Suspended

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/rs-9...-no-but-3-railway-officers-still-axed-1688806

 

[The_Showstopper]

What a way to be apologetic about triple talaq ! Clearly the SC didn't rebuke the Govt for its stand on TT

Twisting statements or just unable to understand simple english? Read the OP again, it never claimed that Supreme Court mentioned about TT but the article which states so.

How can it be divorce 'rate' ? It is definitely not divorce per 100 women.

The data you posted is only a comparison between the number of Divorced Hindu women whose population is obviously much more in these districts and divorced Muslim women whose population is low. Ranjeet's post proves that

Read the links I posted, then please do question. The article in plain english states that divorce rate is less among muslims when compared to other religions.

 

[IndoCarib]

Twisting statements or just unable to understand simple english? Read the OP again, it never claimed that Supreme Court mentioned about TT but the article which states so.

I am not twisting statements but the article that YOU posted does. That means YOU endorse twisting of facts.

 

[The_Showstopper]

I am not twisting statements but the article that YOU posted does. That means YOU endorse twisting of facts.

Posting in bold does not change facts. You were unable to read and understand the OP and instead got started with your rant.

 

[IndoCarib]

Twisting statements or just unable to understand simple english? Read the OP again, it never claimed that Supreme Court mentioned about TT but the article which states so.


Read the links I posted, then please do question. The article in plain english states that divorce rate is less among muslims when compared to other religions.

IT is not divorce rate. This is a 'survey' done by some Madrasa / Sharia NGO for gods sake. They don't know what 'rate' is. Neither do you !! Next time be selective in posting articles

 

[Hulk]

Railway catering scam: 100gm curd for ₹972, refined oil for ₹1,241 a litre

• 
  The details pertain to items purchased and stocked at the warehouse in CSTM (Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus) and distributed to the IRCTC's Jan Ahar canteens, railway base kitchens and trains such as the Deccan Queen and the Kurla-Hazrat Nizamuddin Express.
  
  Mr. Bose alleged that the railways were incurring losses due to such scams. “I was provided with details after a long wait, and information for only a few months was shared though I had wanted it for a full year. Commodities like chicken with bone, tur dal, moong dal, besan and even tissue paper have been purchased at inflated costs.”
  
  As per the reply, other commodities procured by the railways included 58 litres of refined oil for ₹72,034 in March 2016, or a litre of refined oil for ₹1,241. It also bought 150 packets of Tata Salt for ₹2,670, or ₹49 a packet instead of its then MRP of ₹15, water bottles and soft drinks were for ₹59 a bottle.
  
  A few items, including samosas, onions and potatoes, however, were procured at the correct rates.
  
  Stock mismatch
  The RTI reply also revealed a distribution mismatch. While 250 kg of flour was purchased for ₹7,680, the railways claimed to have distributed 450 kg of flour (90 kg to base kitchen and 360 kg to the IRCTC-run Jan Ahar canteens). Similarly, 35 kg of maida was shown as distributed, though only 20 kg was purchased. It also bought 255 kg of Basmati rice, but said it distributed 745 kg to the base kitchen and the Kurla-Hazrat Nizamuddin Express.
  
  “According to the railway reports, the Jan Ahar Canteens and stalls at LTT [Lokmanya Tilak Terminus] and other stations are running at a loss, but the RTI reply gives us the actual picture,” Mr. Bose said.
  
  Divisional Railway Manager of the Central Railway Ravindra Goyal said, “This must be a typing error, but I will look into the matter.”
  
  Subodh Jain, former General Manager of the Central Railway, said, “There is a proper channel for purchasing these items. The purchase committee finalise the rates.”
  
  Requesting anonimity, a senior railway official from New Delhi who has worked closely with the Central Railway, said, “This cannot be happen on paper as there are some scandals in the past in which CSTM catering was at fault. Every year, the railways show loss in crores of rupees, and the reason is such scams. These need to be looked into seriously.”
  
  Subhash Gupta, member, Zonal Railway Users Consultative Committee (ZRUCC) and its president, Rail Pravasi Sangh, said, “This is a very serious issue and needs to be looked into by senior railway authorities. So many items being purchased at higher costs and a difference in procurement and distribution cannot be typing mistakes. This has been happening since long and passengers are always the losers. Due to such scams, the railways claims it is running at a loss, increases fares and decreases passenger amenities. Action should be taken against the officials involved.”

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities...ined-oil-for-1241-a-litre/article18348422.ece

You are 100% Aaptard. This was clarified same day the units were wrong.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Yo do know that this link also quotes the same survey?

These figures were from the eight districts of Kannur (Kerala), Nasik (Maharashtra), Karimnagar (Telangana), Guntur (Andhra Pradesh), Secunderabad (Hyderabad), Malappuram (Kerala), Ernakulam (Kerala) and Palakkad (Kerala).

So?

 

[ranjeet]

Read the links I posted, then please do question. The article in plain english states that divorce rate is less among muslims when compared to other religions.

"Sharing data collected from family courts in certain Muslim concentrated districts across the country..."

The article in plain english said the data is from Muslim concentrated districts, whereas 2011 census proves these districts are hardly "concentrated". Why lie about it? The author is cherry picking data to back triple talaq apologists by presenting a bogus survey. It can't be taken seriously.

 

[The_Showstopper]

You are 100% Aaptard. This was clarified same day the units were wrong.

Ok Bhakt

 

[ranjeet]

So?

So, it's a bogus survey.

 

[The_Showstopper]

"Sharing data collected from family courts in certain Muslim concentrated districts across the country..."

The article in plain english said the data is from Muslim concentrated districts, whereas 2011 census proves these districts are hardly "concentrated". Why lie about it? The author is cherry picking data to back triple talaq apologists by presenting a bogus survey. It can't be taken seriously.

So tell me how many of the districts in India are muslim majority? Almost all of the districts are in either J&K and Assam.

So, it's a bogus survey.

How is it bogus?

 

[ranjeet]

So tell me how many of the districts in India are muslim majority? Almost all of the districts are in either J&K and Assam.

Hey I didn't made the claim of data being from Muslim dominated districts, you should ask the Mullahs why they are peddling lies to save their skin?

How is it bogus?

It's bogus because they are lying.

 

[The_Showstopper]

Hey I didn't made the claim of data being from Muslim dominated districts, you should ask the Mullahs why they are peddling lies to save their skin?

Well the "Muslim dominated districts" statement could be wrong but the data includes districts which has large muslim population compared to other districts. So how is it bogus?