KRAIT
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 16,971
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
I agree, nothing can replace Humans but that doesn't mean UCAV are not developed. One has to understand majority of missions and role of these fighter planes in our doctrine. I would rather see for what role these planes are given primarily. As Sancho said, Super Sukhois and FGFA will be our air superiority fighters and Rafale may not require second pilot for majority of missions. Plus the human machine interface in Rafale is pretty good.Now u r THINKING Mr. Think Tank
+ I think what sancho is trying to say that machines can't substitute HUMANS, no matter how advanced they get, that's why IAF doctrine calls for a second pilot to get better view of combat radius.
If I take example of Raptor, it has taken 1 vs 5 and 2 vs 8 easily against F-15 Eagle. It all depends on how advance your fighter is. You don't need a second pilot if technology in your plane gives you significant advantage over enemy aircrafts. If problems like EF had in Libya operation is considered, it can be taken care of by better, simple but precise targeting systems. I think IAF has considered these aspects too while selecting Rafale over other MMRCA contestants.