Thorough Pro
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 13,232
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
@ mods can we ban creation of more "Rafael" threads.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taking just 36 makes no sense both from an economy of scale, logistics PoV and from the fact that the IAF fleet is ageing rapidly and if those required squadron strengths have to be maintained; more aircraft are needed.
The actual misfortune to befall the IAF and HAL both is the mismanagement of the Tejas program. Had it run as it should have, the MMRCA could have been curtailed and the IAF still could have bolstered its numbers by inducting more Tejas.
The initial 36 however look like a quick deal to avoid an overzealous CAG and get things started for the IAF while the local production deal is sorted out. That off course all actually depends on how far the rather money minded nations of India and France are willing to go in their effort to grab every last penny.
The IAF will not be getting the PAK-FA, they want the FGFA- nothing less. And how could the PAK-FA cost less than the Rafale? This is pure speculation and nonsensical to say the least. As soon as India signs for 36 Rafales it is effectively signing for at least 126- if not 189. 36 Rafales only would lead to a massive waste of resources and would never be permitted by the IAF.
Exactly which is why this 36 is what Modi said in Paris- a quick fix meant to meet the immediate needs of the IAF whilst the deal for the remaining 90+ Rafales to be produced in India is worked out.Taking just 36 makes no sense both from an economy of scale, logistics PoV
LCA or not the MMRCA would always have been required- a MKI and LCA only IAF would be rather imbalanced, the IAF needs a heavier strike fighter, the MKI is their air dominance fighter, the LCA is their point defence interceptor. The Rafale perfectly fits into their requirements,long range strike missions are that plane's bread and butter.The actual misfortune to befall the IAF and HAL both is the mismanagement of the Tejas program. Had it run as it should have, the MMRCA could have been curtailed and the IAF still could have bolstered its numbers by inducting more Tejas.
I am always bemused when someone mentions the IAF and its falling squadron numbers
Out of no where, they have a 'sanctioned' requirement of 40+ squadrons because they want to deal with China and Pakistan simultaneously.
If that is not funny enough, they barely manage 32 squadrons today, out of which 11 squadrons worth of MIG 27 and MIG21 are to be retired. With no MMRCA signed, Tejas going into 2020s and Sukhoi numbers not being increased, how the heck do they think they can even have 32 squadrons operational by 2025-2030 let alone 42?
The IAF has ZERO interest in the PAK-FA, they are ONLY interested in the FGFA and will not get anything but.You never know the cost of PAK-FA and we yet to get the same in our hands
I think it is like you compare F-35 to F-15 silent eagle. why not put the monies in to a 5th jet air frame? Once we get the same in 2016-17(one prototype), we can study it and if suitable, can limit Rafale and go for a new 5th gen plat form if cost is viable.
how the heck do they think they can even have 32 squadrons operational by 2025-2030 let alone 42
Dontello re : Your question
IAF Today
10 Sqds or 200 SU30MKI
6 Sqds 110 Mig29 & Mirage2000
5 Sqds 90 Jaguars
11 Sqds 220 Mig27 &Mig 21 BISON ALL gone by 2019
IAF in 2019
272 Su30mki 15 Sqds
110 Mirage2000/5 Mig29smt 6 Sqds
90 Jaguar 5 Sqds
36 Rafale 2 Sqds
40 Tejas Mk1 2 Sqds = 30 Sqds in Total by 2019/2020
AFTER 2020 I see More Tejas Or More Rafale
AFTER 2022 I see FGFA
are u aware of production rate of Su 30 mki by HAL ?At least 6-8 more sq of su30 mki will be added too in next 2-3 yrs
Count up : Day 5.
Damn so silent now.
I am always bemused when someone mentions the IAF and its falling squadron numbers
Out of no where, they have a 'sanctioned' requirement of 40+ squadrons because they want to deal with China and Pakistan simultaneously.
If that is not funny enough, they barely manage 32 squadrons today, out of which 11 squadrons worth of MIG 27 and MIG21 are to be retired. With no MMRCA signed, Tejas going into 2020s and Sukhoi numbers not being increased, how the heck do they think they can even have 32 squadrons operational by 2025-2030 let alone 42?