What's new

Racist Winston Churchill on Sudanese and Pathans

Samandri

BANNED
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
1,959
Reaction score
-10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
About Pathans
Nor are these struggles conducted with the weapons which usually belong to the races of such development. To the ferocity of the Zulu are added the craft of the Redskin and the marksmanship of the Boer. The world is presented with that grim spectacle, "the strength of civilisation without its mercy." At a thousand yards the traveller falls wounded by the well-aimed bullet of a breech-loading rifle. His assailant, approaching, hacks him to death with the ferocity of a South-Sea Islander. The weapons of the nineteenth century are in the hands of the savages of the Stone Age.

About Sudanese

The Soudanese [sic] are of many tribes, but two main races can be clearly distinguished: the aboriginal natives, and the Arab settlers. The indigenous inhabitants of the country were negroes as black as coal. Strong, virile, and simple-minded savages, they lived as we may imagine prehistoric men - hunting, fighting, marrying, and dying, with no ideas beyond the gratification of their physical desires, and no fears save those engendered by ghosts, witchcraft, the worship of ancestors, and other forms of superstition common among peoples of low development.
..............................
The qualities of mongrels are rarely admirable, and the mixture of the Arab and negro types has produced a debased and cruel breed, more shocking because they are more intelligent than the primitive savages.


About Red Indians and original Australians

I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race has come in and taken their place.
 
What is the obsession with posting threads on Churchill? As if it's somehow strange that a man born in 1875 looked down on people of other races.
Your Britain demonized Germans for racism in WW2, but it seems the hero Churchil was greater racist than Hitlar.
 
I would love to see Churchill’s reaction to modern day Great Britain. :lol:
He wanted his party to campaign on an election slogan to "keep England white". This was in 1955.
Your Britain demonized Germans for racism in WW2, but it seems the hero Churchil was greater racist than Hitlar.
Hitler's racism was primarily directed against other Europeans.
 
English always had this problem.. Racism is in their blood .. :)
 
Your Britain demonized Germans for racism in WW2, but it seems the hero Churchil was greater racist than Hitlar.

Read Quaid's stern warning to Churchill.



Jinnah vs Churchill.jpg
 
He wanted his party to campaign on an election slogan to "keep England white". This was in 1955.

Hitler's racism was primarily directed against other Europeans.

What's a Brit doing on a PakDefence forum? Plus, are you English, if so, what's your views on the Asians (Indians/Pakistanis etc.) in the UK?
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom