What's new

Questions abound as Bangladesh science teacher arrested for ‘hurting religious feelings’

Oh but "bangladeshi sab kattwe he", "Hindus being oppressed in BD" & "BD Govs fails to protect minorities" all that and yet this individual, supposedly a Hindu, judging from the name, told a class full of muslim teenagers, who mind you could've given him a severe beatdown, that their religion and beliefs are false, only to get away with it.

And not just that, the school authorities tried to brush it aside too.


If anything this proves that minorities can do or say anything in bangladesh and get away with it, while muslims in India are systematically being erased, eliminated and vanquished.




Malda dadas ought to think things through before starting threads that only expose their deep desire to flame bait and malign people of other faiths.



Very pathetic behavior from a supposedly grown man.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Dekho bhai sectarianism na phailao

Aur agar phailana hai to humain bhi ijazat do k hum bhi phailaye

Sectarianism haram hai ,

Baaki rhi bat facts ki to bhai Bengali mullah buzurgo k fatvo k haatho majbor hai . Science prhao inhy -----.
 
.
Sectarianism haram hai ,

Baaki rhi bat facts ki to bhai Bengali mullah buzurgo k fatvo k haatho majbor hai . Science prhao inhy -----.

Woh to jo parhna hai parh lain gai

Aap apni fikar karo
 
. .
Shaukar hai in k fatvay goro ko nae pta

Deeht honay ki b had hai k zameen sakit hai ?

Goro ko aik doosrai firqai ka bhi nahi pata

Agar un ka pata chal jaye to Islam hi qubool na karain
 
. . .
If we go back far enough we are all descendants of a single cell from billions of years ago.

Lucy maybe human but not our species of human, which is homosapien. We may have to narrow down the species even further. From religious point of view we define our species with the beginning of morals, the beginning of burials, and such, so right now it may or may not match the way science defines modern humans species.

Religious definition of modern human is the definition of human we relate to.
No religion has anything to do with the definition of human being. Religions say the Earth/ Universe was created 6000 or 7500 years ago when we know our Earth was created about 5 billion years ago.

There is no way an uneducated religion leader 2000 years ago had any knowledge about creation of the Universe. Their observations were limited to what they saw in the naked eyes like all other people at that time and most people of to day belonging to a certain religion.
 
.
Rather the supposed so called science teacher said Prophet Muhammad wrote the Quran by himself and supported it. Part of Quran is derived from Science.
Science or what I do not know, but the verses of the Holy book was scattered among many people. The 1st Caliph Hazrat Abu Bakr was the first to collect them with the help of Ibn Ishaq, who was the scriber for Prophet Muhammed.

It was the time of 3rd Caliph Hazrat Usman that a Committee under him compiled the version of the Holy book what we read now. It was again Ibn Ishaq who was leading the committee.

The original Holy book written by Hazrat Ali was not accepted by the Usman committee and is now preserved in a museum in Turky/ Istanbul.

It was already over 30 years after the death of the Prophet when the Holy book was re-compiled in its present form. On the other hand, the Hadiths took about 200 years to be compiled by many authors.

Please check history to prove otherwise in both counts.
 
Last edited:
.
No religion has anything to do with the definition of human being. Religions say the Earth/ Universe was created 6000 or 7500 years ago when we know our Earth was created about 5 billion years ago.

There is no way an uneducated religion leader 2000 years ago had any knowledge about creation of the Universe. Their observations were limited to what they saw in the naked eyes like all other people at that time and most people of to day belonging to a certain religion.
Quran does not say the earth is 6000 years old. You might as well be a type of Christian fundamentalist as your assertion is based on the acceptance of a Christian interpretation. Why should I accept it? Sounds like you have an agenda.

Even if it was a Muslim interpretation, which it isn't, just because someone says it, doesn't mean I must accept it. I have my own mind and faith.

I don't think the Bible specifically says the earth is 6000 to 8000 years old. Moreover, Bible is not original text like the Quran is. It was translated from Greek.

In any case, the religious definition of our species is logically who we are. Science is currently looking at physical features and DNA similarity and it has not reached adequate levels to exactly date the species which we are today. I am talking physically, morally and intellectually, which means it is possible to take an Amazon jungle tribeswoman and turn her into a lawyer, but it would be impossible to do that with Lucy.

If it was just about ancestry, then a single cell is also our ancestor, so is the creature that first crawled on its belly, and so on. Thus, we must draw the line at some point and it is definitely not at Lucy. Even the closest human species Neanderthals are not us, genetically they were 99.7% like us.
 
.
Science or what I do not know, but the verses of the Holy book was scattered among many people. The 1st Caliph Hazrat Abu Bakr was the first to collect them with the help of Ibn Ishaq, who was the scriber for Prophet Muhammed.

It was the time of 3rd Caliph Hazrat Usman that a Committee under him compiled the version of the Holy book what we read now. It was again Ibn Ishaq who was leading the committee.

The original Holy book written by Hazrat Ali was not accepted by the Usman committee and is now preserved in a museum in Turky/ Istanbul.

It was already over 30 years after the death of the Prophet when the Holy book was re-compiled in its present form. On the other hand, the Hadiths took about 200 years to be compiled by many authors.

Please check history to prove otherwise in both counts.

So what’s your point on compilation after 30 years? Is there any difference between present Quran or Ali’s Quran? Do you even know why Ali (R)’s Quran was not accepted? It’s because individually written Quran based on memorization can have error even if it’s a very minor one. So to eliminate that the thirty member committee complied the Quran and match that with Abu Bakr (R)’s Quran that he kept it with him after original compilation.

Another part of the committee is to upgrade language. As the Khaliphat expanded so it brought a rapid changes to the Arabic language where to many kuraish dialect of Arabic was difficult. If I am not mistaken they have included jer, jabr, pesh for the first time.

Regardless this compilation history is a complete different topic than what the teacher said. The teacher said Quran is a man made book which prophet Muhammad was clever enough to promote. It’s fake and students should not follow it.
 
.
To tum bhi quran parho aur yeh firqawariat chor do

Aur us Jehlum walai dhongi ko bhi yehi bolo

Jehlmi sy phely b log Quran parhty thy us m b zameen sakit nahi hai haan albatta aik firkay k fatvo m hai
 
.
Jehlmi sy phely b log Quran parhty thy us m b zameen sakit nahi hai haan albatta aik firkay k fatvo m hai

Aik firqai k fatwon main nikah e mutah k liye kisi gawah ki bhi zaroorat nahi. Jab chahai jitna chahai karo

Choro yeh sectarianism. Warna karna hai to poora karo. Takai hum bhi karain
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom