vostok
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2013
- Messages
- 10,291
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
I argue that the collapse of the Union was illegal. Consequently, to restore the legitimacy we need the country's reunification. Consequently, any action aimed at the reunification of the former Soviet Union - are legitimate. And vice versa - any action to counter the reunification of the state - are illegal. It's very simple. To restore the legitimacy of the world order that emerged after WW2 we need to revive the unity of the state, whose capital is Moscow.And who is "we"?
You claim that Russia is not a legal entity.
It cannot cannot assume it is USSR.
Logically, annexing Crimea to Russia is then illegal.
The USSR can of course convene new meetings, but I doubt that anyone but Russia would attend such meetings.
Maybe if only Russia attended, it could make decisions, but most organisations require a minimum attendance.
The last head of the Soviet Union was Gorbachev, and he is not going to be a player.
Any attempts by Russia to take other "illegal" countries will be condemned by the Security Council,
and cannot be vetoed by Russia since it is not a member of the Security Council.
Russia would be left in Limbo.
If Russia is legal, then Russia has acknowledge Ukraine as a Sate, and that
cannot be reversed. The legality of any government in Ukraine is then non of Russias business.
Don't get me wrong, if Russians in Crimea (or Eastern Ukraine) want to join Russia,
this is possible, in the same way as Scotland has a referendum on secceeding from Great Britain.
Needs to be done in an acceptable way to both the Crimean people and to the Ukrainan people,
This means a political process involving a democratic debate.
Not the stupid move by Putin, which alienates a lot of people to Russia.
As for right wing AKA Nazis in Western Ukraine they never got a lot of votes in elections,
so situation should be improved after elections in May.
European governments has seen the deteriorating situation in Hungary,
and wants stricter rules on behaviour of members, making Nazi/Fascist
governments n impossibility, and discrimination of Russians in Ukraine
would not be acceptable as well.
In 1991 should have taken place signing of a new Union treaty. Instead totally illegal Belovezhskie agreement were held. To bring the situation back into the legal field, representatives of the republics should sign new Union treaty. And after this agreement, in accordance with the legal procedures can take place legitimate output of individual republics from the New Union. For example - the Baltic states.