@WebMaster @Horus
Please look at this post and decide for yourself if it deserved a negative rating:
Can’t keep waiting for stealth fighter, India tells Russia | Page 4
Indians have been saying the same for Pakistan in countless threads and it has been rebutted but no negative ratings given
per se. It should not be because "
Baggers cant be choosers" is an idiom, an expression, which simply means that when you cannot have exactly what you want (because you are not making or producing it, or depending on others), you must accept whatever you can get. Has this member ever given negative ratings to those who use the similar expressions for Pakistan? What about the following:
J-31, who is buying?
J-31, who is buying?
These are just two recent examples otherwise this forum is full of this sort of crap comments by the Indian members, which never bothered the honorable TT saheb.
Negative ratings, if I understand correctly, are given when certain forum rules are broken, when facts are twisted, or when someone is unduly insulted etc. What forum rules have been broken,what facts are twisted, and who was insulted by the use of an idiomatic expression? Is this not a fact that Indians depend on technologically advanced countries such as Russia, UK, France, US for the acquisition of advanced military hardware? Russia delayed the retrofitting and delivery of the aircraft carrier, what India could do other than requests? Now if I say "baggers cant be choosers" in that context, is this wrong?
I hope management will look into this matter favorably. Thanks.
