PNS Babar damaged our helicopter net: Naval Chief

[mautkimaut]

The helicopter lands at the back of the ship in INS Godavari..

That means at the instance of impact the INS was ahead of PNS Babur..

So the PNS Babur must have rammed it from back....

It could be a normal navigational mistake as well as a deliberate action on PNS part

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/INS_Ganga.jpg

You can have a look at the image of the ship..

 

[Black Widow]

So, where is this evidence?

It is given to the concern people, If PN will ask for it, it will be provided to them... Publishing picture of PNS Babur is not in favor of Pakistan as well

India lodged a protest with Pakistan against the violation by Pakistan Naval Ship (PNS) Babur of relevant regulations on navigational safety by its "risky" manoeuvres jeopardising the safety of INS Godavari and its crew. The protest was lodged through the High Commission of Pakistan in New Delhi.

The Indian action came a day after Pakistan said a protest was lodged with the Indian High Commission in Islamabad over what it alleged a dangerous manoeuvre by an Indian warship which 'brushed' its frigate escorting Eghyptian-owned vessel MV Suez. Pakistan also called the alleged incident on Thursday as serious.

I am looking for Audio and Video proof on google, You too look too will find it...

An INS property was damaged, but was it the Pakistan Navy that did that? What evidence does he have to suggest that?

Evidence is there and it must be provided to concerned person... And don't forget the commander of PNS Babur was Ex ISI operative... (Read that in this forum only) , I am still looking for that news


Here is one ""The defence ministry had handed over pictures to ministry of external affairs which would help it substantiate charges that it was PNS Babur which had indulged in "risky and dangerous" manoeuvres against INS Godavari. ""

http://www.timesnow.tv/Pak-ship-PNS-Babur-at-fault-Navy-chief/articleshow/4376858.cms

 

[53fd]

The helicopter lands at the back of the ship in INS Godavari..

That means at the instance of impact the INS was ahead of PNS Babur..

So the PNS Babur must have rammed it from back....

Again, what proof do you have for supporting this assumption of yours?

 

[kingdurgaking]

So, where is this evidence?

evidence is provided to your government.. you can collect from them..

 

[Black Widow]

Again, what proof do you have for supporting this assumption of yours?

Read My post, I have given you the link and text from that link...

And stop living in denial....

 

[tallboy123]

and still your navy blame babur for damage there chopper .lolz kid babur is not for carry containers but harpoons .lolz

Isn't there a difference between chopper n chopper NET....
Did u see the title of thread ???

 

[53fd]

evidence is provided to your government.. you can collect from them..

Your government also sent a list of 50 most wanted people to Pakistan. You know what became of that list. Anyways, let's see what statement Pakistan gives to your Naval Chief's alleged claims. The wife of the Indian sailor says it was the pirates that attacked them anyways.

 

[Areesh]

An INS property was damaged, but was it the Pakistan Navy that did that? What evidence does he have to suggest that?

Where is the proof that INS property was damaged. Who is going to proof that something was infact damaged and this isn't facesaivng from IN after the humiliation they recieved in the MV Suez story.

 

[mautkimaut]

Again, what proof do you have for supporting this assumption of yours?

See I have no proofs.Only Pakistani and Indian government have proofs.
I just gave a possible solution of how PNS could have rammed into the INS ..

 

[Abingdonboy]

I am full Bihari, but that's not the point.



I suggest you watch the video clip again, from 4:03 onwards. Listen to what the wife of the sailor had to say:

The Indian government, besides not sending the ship, didn't even pay for the release of its fellow citizens. It was their duty to do so, to protect its citizens. What if that had happened to you? It was the Pakistani citizens that donated their money, & raised $2.1 million to release the prisoners.

You are talking BS- no country (respectable country -US/UK/France etc) negotiates with terrorists, in this case the GoI acted in a responsible manner. The GoP has set a bad precident in this case and has now pit the lives of other sailors at risk.

 

[53fd]

See I have no proofs.Only Pakistani and Indian government have proofs.
I just gave a possible solution of how PNS could have rammed into the INS ..

A lot of things could have happened. Especially when the wife of the rescued sailor is saying that the pirates attacked them, not the Pakistan Navy.

---------- Post added at 04:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:26 PM ----------

You are talking BS- no country (respectable country -US/UK/France etc) negotiates with terrorists, in this case the GoI acted in a responsible manner. The GoP has set a bad precident in this case and has now pit the lives of other sailors at risk.

So you would not rescue the lives of your innocent citizens? And what act of terrorism did the pirates commit?

 

[Abingdonboy]

A lot of things could have happened. Especially when the wife of the rescued sailor is saying that the pirates attacked them, not the Pakistan Navy.

---------- Post added at 04:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:26 PM ----------



So you would not rescue the lives of your innocent citizens? And what act of terrorism did the pirates commit?

As harsh as it may seem to say but no I wouldn't as if you do you risk the lives of many more innocent citizens. No negations wi terrorists/hostage takers whatever- cruel to be kind. FBI practice.

 

[mautkimaut]

A lot of things could have happened. Especially when the wife of the rescued sailor is saying that the pirates attacked them, not the Pakistan Navy.

---------- Post added at 04:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:26 PM ----------



So you would not rescue the lives of your innocent citizens? And what act of terrorism did the pirates commit?

Was his wife at the sea?

Both PNS and INS agree that there were collision between the two ships ...

Now the question is who was at fault.

 

[Jango]

As harsh as it may seem to say but no I wouldn't as if you do you risk the lives of many more innocent citizens. No negations wi terrorists/hostage takers whatever- cruel to be kind. FBI practice.

then why US and UK negotiate with al qaeda and taliban in afghanistan???

 

[Jango]

Was her wife at the sea?

Both PNS and INS agree that there were collision between the two ships ...

Now the question is who was at fault.

were you at sea???, was the indian high commisioner at sea???,,,, was the indian government at sea?