What's new

PM Singh may cancel Pak visit after Zardari's Kashmir statement

Kashmir is an "internationally recognized" disputed zone, regardless of how much drum beating you carry out about "internal affairs" its not going to do a thing to wipe it off Pakistan's agenda. No solution to Kashmir means NO peace in S.Asia, the day India realizes it, we will move forward one notch.

It should have been clear to Pak by now that after fighting 4 wars, India doesn't care about peace if it means parting with Kashmir.
 
Ḥashshāshīn;3470317 said:
Ok, Azad Kashmir is also Pakistan's integral part so why does india meddle in that? There are MANY other examples of India meddling in Pakistan's affairs even right now (Baluchistan)

Azad Kashmir is not integral part of Pakistan, Pakistan herself considers it disputed internationally and avoided full integration into Pakistan.
 
Kashmir strategy rethink for pakistan

mentos.JPG
 
Kashmir is an "internationally recognized" disputed zone, regardless of how much drum beating you carry out about "internal affairs" its not going to do a thing to wipe it off Pakistan's agenda. No solution to Kashmir means NO peace in S.Asia, the day India realizes it, we will move forward one notch.

As the defacto occupying power wrt to both Pakistan (Kashmir) & China(AP) , the status quo suits us just fine.

Kashmir is an "internationally recognized" disputed zone, regardless of how much drum beating you carry out about "internal affairs" its not going to do a thing to wipe it off Pakistan's agenda. No solution to Kashmir means NO peace in S.Asia, the day India realizes it, we will move forward one notch.

As the defacto occupying power wrt to both Pakistan (Kashmir) & China(AP) , the status quo suits us just fine.
 
As Bhutto said, we will fight for Kashmir, even if it means fighting for a 1000 years, so Mr Sing can stay home and play ping pong. Pakistan, may be busy dealing with its internal mess but once we bounce back - in time - Pakistanis won't back out until Kashmiris get their right to determine between India, Pakistan or a separate state.

do you see yourself capable of seeing and analyzing the problems of people staying across the border and resolve them? dont take it like that but just give it a thought to this...guess, after losing BD, you would be interested in keeping Baloch than pursuing old and outdated topic called as Kashmir...

FYI...kashmir is no more being seen as an asset..its a liability but it has become a prestige issue! ..
 
Indian foreign office now needs to re-define the wordings. It needs to be kashmir problem and not Kashmir dispute. The international community can take a hike and if and only if Pakistan decides to restart providing its moral support we should provide moral support to deserving and disgruntled people in Pakistan. Two can play at the game.
 
Good...there is no point in talking to a country who can never keep their promises..
Talking from the back side is what indian diplomats and government has been doing for the last 60 years..at least with Pakistan..

Musharraf waisted 3 days in India and got nothing out of them..
that should be an example for all Pakistani rulers..
 
Good...there is no point in talking to a country who can never keep their promises..
Talking from the back side is what indian diplomats and government has been doing for the last 60 years..at least with Pakistan..

Musharraf waisted 3 days in India and got nothing out of them..
that should be an example for all Pakistani rulers..
 
Kashmir is an "internationally recognized" disputed zone, regardless of how much drum beating you carry out about "internal affairs" its not going to do a thing to wipe it off Pakistan's agenda. No solution to Kashmir means NO peace in S.Asia, the day India realizes it, we will move forward one notch.


But Government of India consider it as Integral part and Internal matter at the same time, and that's what matters for citizen of India! Rest can keep pampering about it on International platforms every-now and then, just like you are doing since your existence, there was/is and will always be same response from GOI and that is "J&k is our Integral Part and will remain so".

And i agree with your assertion of drawing parallel line between peace in south asia and resolution of Kashmir, but let me tell you one thing, No one is dying for peace on this side, we have fought 4 so far and may fight 40 more in future for the same.but that doesn't means India giving up its claim or agreeing to your demands regarding it.
 
Good...there is no point in talking to a country who can never keep their promises..
Talking from the back side is what indian diplomats and government has been doing for the last 60 years..at least with Pakistan..

Musharraf waisted 3 days in India and got nothing out of them..
that should be an example for all Pakistani rulers..


Those two words are the root of all problems...
 
As Bhutto said, we will fight for Kashmir, even if it means fighting for a 1000 years, so Mr Sing can stay home and play ping pong. Pakistan, may be busy dealing with its internal mess but once we bounce back - in time - Pakistanis won't back out until Kashmiris get their right to determine between India, Pakistan or a separate state.

Bhutto said lots of things. He ended up at the end of a rope.
Mianji said lots of things. He ended up as a guest of the Saudis.
Bibi said lots of things. Poor lady paid with her life.
Musharraf said lots of things. He is in exile.
Zia said lots of things. The verdict is still out on what happened.

From above, lots of people say lots of things. Should not take everything seriously. :no:
 
EzioAltaïr;3470339 said:
We don't meddle with Azad Kashmir. India is ready to convert the LoC into the International Border, but Pakistan is hell bent on trying to occupy the whole of Kashmir.

The fact that india is ready to convert LOCin tointernational border is proof enough that india is aggressor /occupier, otherwise who would be willing to split it's ATOT ANG (integeral part).

Pakistan will never agree to convert LOC into internatinal border, because Kashmir, the whole of it belongs to Pakistan.

Bhutto said lots of things. He ended up at the end of a rope.
Mianji said lots of things. He ended up as a guest of the Saudis.
Bibi said lots of things. Poor lady paid with her life.
Musharraf said lots of things. He is in exile.
Zia said lots of things. The verdict is still out on what happened.

From above, lots of people say lots of things. Should not take everything seriously. :no:

Gandhi said lots of things = got killed by own bodyguard.
Indra said lots of things = got killed by own bodyguard.
Rajev said lots of things = got blown to pieces by indian trained terrorsits LTTE.

shouldn't hurry in laughing at others..........
 
these inferiority complexed indians with their funny usernames dont have anything else to do in their latrine-less country ....so they come here and troll...........Pakistani public is not interested whether sardar manmohan comes or not comes..........if indians have any shame left in themselves then they should not come to city of nankana sahab either.
 
Back
Top Bottom