Darth Vader
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/groupcaptain.jpg)
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2011
- Messages
- 4,447
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
What if PLA target US instead of carrier? Any analysis there?
with what ? are you talking about Nukes or invasion ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What if PLA target US instead of carrier? Any analysis there?
Virus for humanityBut still population growing at steady pace , it seems you are really pissed at Upper cast Indians disowning you ancestors .
![]()
Can you please explain how?
with what ? are you talking about Nukes or invasion ?
What if PLA target US instead of carrier? Any analysis there?
And You Overestimate your air forces way to much Currently the 4th generation aircraft are not even 300 272 sukhoi of which 171 are only operational and around 50 mirage 2000
and on the Chinese Side Only j 10s are around 300
and about preemptive strike what if China does that who starts 1st will have a advantage for a little time after that all hell will lose on both sides
and we are talking about current Chinese army not the 70s or 80s
You are not fighting with swords Fancey Toys Gives a huge boost
One example US forces vs Iraqi forces they were updated but US Forces had a huge tech on their side
SAMS and troos transport china can deply way faster than india
You cant Deply 70 to 80 of your forces Because around 500000 is only in kashmir if you deply that on the Chinese side you will give pakistan and fighters in kashmir a golden chance to attack
New Recruit
Then PLA would lose 100% of China!!![]()
if the war should develop like that you cant help not bringing in Ruskie, nato, nuke and WW3!
You Mean Nato VS Russia + China well then their will be no winner Cz IF Nato nows they are about to lose they will nuke
if China and russia know they are about to lose they will Nuke which will start a full on NUKE WAR IDM no winner
War it self is a enemy
But Nato have advtange in tech
and China and russia lets just if they are not less in tech but they do enjoy a numbers game
first,
actually IA's size is over 1.3 million and we have fair amount of share of para military forces protecting these borders..it is around 7-8 lakh soldiers(both military and paramilitary) patrolling these borders- in Kashmir,in Sikkim and in Arunachal.
second..
nobody knows how many aircrafts China have and nor their capability.even 300-400 fighter jets are more than enough for a war against China-and thst estimates is based on IAF chief's comment,as IAF doctrine states that they can prevail a 2 front war with 70-80% of their force.now thats not some fanboy stuff,its a doctrine of 4th largest Airforce.
third..
we've fair share of shiny new equipment like China does.but lets estimate how strong force China can send against India while they guard against Taiwan,Japan,Korea and other fronts???
they can send as large force as 3-5 lakh soldiers in an all out war against India.but do they have enough resource to pull out a mountain war against same number or more Indian soldiers??if you study military doctrines,you need atleast 3:1 superiority to win a war in plain while in mountain,you need 6:1 to 8:1 superiority,if you're an aggressor.generally defender enjoy fortification,entrenchment and other privileges.can they field so massive army against India???
next..
we don't count upon Rafale or Super 30 in an war against China.we have 2 bases along the border of Arunachal(actually in Assam) where we already fielded 3 divisions or more Su-30,apart from other ground attack jets and interceptors.plus,we're making solid air defence.now,IAF's doctrine is stating that in case of 2 front war(not just China,but Pakistan too),even jets from southern commands will be airborne to fight against enemy fighters and to perform ground attack.plus,we can flew with full load(which PLAAF jets from Tibet can't carry),plus we've privilege of Tankers and Awacs,all inside of our side.so,you should ask,is it IAF going to only base nearest airbase only???
there are too many factors,too many uncertainties..while IAF's aim will be to contain PLAAF,PLAAF aim will be total Air Supremacy(even you know that can't be done).
as IA chief is saying that IA is well entrenched in all the sectors,you can bet that even if their force overwhelm us to certain extent,it will be a stalemate as even PLA know that no way they can carry their supply lines and heavier tanks,bridges and other equipment through Arunachal or Sikkim or Kashmir.so,how the hell they're going to fight an well entrenched modern army??
only setback till now is road and rail connectivity till now,which is behind the schedule.but around 2016,all of those are going to be completed,enabling IA similar capability to bring man and equipment from plains to mountain in short time.
Swift retaliation... Not very in-depth analysis I realize, but its what would happen.
dude i m not bull shittingb*ll shitting on forum doesnt give you a sure winner
My projection for WW3 is valid and most probable!
We may have lost 95% and you 90% leaving 10% to breath for another 3 to 5 years on death beds!