doppelganger
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
- Messages
- 5,052
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
If you want to call it that. Even this theory clearly sets North Indians + Eastern Pakistanis (Indic, Indo-Aryan, 'Ancestral North Indian', you name it) from Dravidians. Calling us all the same really is pushing the boundaries. Even this thread really focuses on the similar aspect between Pakistan and North Indian only.
Look, if your Indic guys can form a country with a completely different civilizational populace (the Iranic side) on the basis of a shared faith, why is it difficult to imagine our Indic guys (ancestral North and South Indians) forming a nation on the basic of a shared civilaztional history, culture as well as faith?
Yes, things turned out differently. Pakistan was a construct that was formed with dovetailed two different civilizations into one. To the externt that now 70 years later, you have a "national" language and identity.
But you equally also have a nation torn asunder by bloodshed.
We do not.
Why? Because we ARE the same. While you claim to be the same.
We claim to be one because of our culture and our shared heritage and not the faith we practice. And the cohesion is apparent to the world.
You claim to be one because of simply the common strand of faith. Two civilzations, one faith. And the results are also out there for the world to see.