terranMarine
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Lt.General.jpg)
- Joined
- May 3, 2012
- Messages
- 7,597
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
![133434221_14036103491371n.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.xinhuanet.com%2Fenglish%2Fphoto%2F2014-06%2F24%2F133434221_14036103491371n.jpg&hash=67cb933df3aea648346527e3d29a913c)
Gives you an idea of the size
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a toilet paper.Where can I buy this new Chinese Map? I can't find it anywhere.
New Recruit
this is a true map of Qing Dynasty as a dynasty of china,and each dynasty's territory is difference,so this map cant represent the territory of PRC.and dont thank me,i will tell you a common sense,this map is not a full map of Qing Dynasty,it just countains"直省" which means "This is true map of China.
![]()
this is a true map of Qing Dynasty as a dynasty of china,and each dynasty's territory is difference,so this map cant represent the territory of PRC.and dont thank me,i will tell you a common sense,this map is not a full map of Qing Dynasty,it just countains"直省" which means "
direct provinces,that is to say,it didnot countain autonomous regions、vassal states and territorial waters.
is there no chinese member expain this map?this is a simply common sense.
dont make me laugh.is this VN's so-called proof,a partial and preceding dynasty's map?
New Recruit
there was not a nation called PRC In 1904,and read my former reply carefully.Problem is that in this atlas 1904, chinese stated by words that there is last point of China territory, is at Hanan Islands.![]()
if a new government in philippine established in the following year and they produced a new map which claim all under heaven. do you think ít is legal thing?there was not a nation called PRC In 1904,and read my former reply carefully.
Well the basis of both Vietnam and China claims over SCS is historical territories. Then China in 1904 said they didn't have the islands and sea under control, or I should say Chinese govt at that time did not have any management over the islands. I mean the islands belonged to no province, no one come to collect tax, no police, etc.there was not a nation called PRC In 1904,and read my former reply carefully.
New Recruit
dont disguised replacement of concept and twist my reply.every country ' s territorial integrity and sovereignty need other's recognizing,and have enough power to defend it,obviously phil have not.and about legal,you can say you are legal,and other can say illegal.if a new government in philippine established in the following year and they produced a new map which claim all under heaven. do you think ít is legal thing?
Well the basis of both Vietnam and China claims over SCS is historical territories. Then China in 1904 said they didn't have the islands and sea under control, or I should say Chinese govt at that time did not have any management over the islands. I mean the islands belonged to no province, no one come to collect tax, no police, etc.
I am not sure how many types of map there are in China, but if China showed a map of the whole country, might as well include the islands. I don't see any point of not showing if the islands belonged to China.