There is one interesting difference in views of West while making difference between Indians (mainly Hindus) and Pakistanis (or Muslims as whole). That is, West wants to use Muslims and get Hindus.
Sir, there are two type of people/ countries are found in world in relation to West. One the country like Philippines which is a Christian country, which receives heavy remittances from West because Philipo are there in good numbers, even if it is a very small country w.r.t. India/ China. And the other type of country is like Thailand which is also of similar sized like Philippines but Buddhist majority have made their technologies by themselves, without any help from West, and even if Thailand receive a fraction of remittances as Philippines, per capita income of Thailand is around 2.5 times to Philippines, while both the countries are of similar size and are located on same region, same race but different religious background, one get full help from West and one is certainly not among the followers of West
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hence, it is found by the Western psychologists that, those who trust in themselves more than others, arent dependent on the help they may get from the West, are likely to be more successful. Like how China liberalized its economy by 1979, much before India, and registered excellent growth since then while being an enemy of US/ West also and now per capita income if China is around 2 times to Philippines. Russia, a developed country, too is having great technologies in the main areas like Space Research, Defense etc, with having key techs in other variety of areas also. At the same time, the rulers of US/ West are always impressed with performance of Highly qualified people they get from India, who are among the top most performances in different exams, and help the USs firm develop key techs
This way, even if religious colony type countries like Philippines are loyal to West because of Christian religious background, who receive very high remittances also as compare to other similar sized country and get easy visa of West, West is always willing to get the creamy layer people of their opponent like India/ China/ Thailand etc. and to get their work done against the state of India, they have countries like Pakistan in their pocket. But as always, either they want Pakistan to do exactly what is told to them by Uk/ US, otherwise they dont hesitate to do something like 26/11 2001 with Pakistan.
But on the side of India, they always try to get the creamy layer of Indian Hindus and keep removing all those Indians who try to resist Western dominance 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sir, I have got an opportunity to understand the Western politicians from very close as they were always impressed with the my approach, to the level I may argue or defend a country, like how I did in case of India many times. It was always no doubt to them that a man of having any type of belief cant argue with so many logical comments, but a free mind who may consider all the aspects is required to get this approach to defend any political side. I was given the level to straight participate with the retired presidents and PMs of US/ UK/ Australia, to check how much experience they have and how much I may argue with them to defend any country like India which was never with West. even since independence of India, Mr Jinnah, a governor general of Britain, was always provided full support against India, as how he was always there against Mr Gandhi's efforts of freedom fighting. And, while being with them, getting their view through different sources of media, I also got a level of idea, how they view the world and where the problems exist? My comment as above is also one of the key findings while being in Australia for over 10 years. To give an example, I told to many Pakistanis Muslims in Australia that, there is always an effort to put a Western girl in front of mine, who may then be put somewhere in Indian politics. But do they do the same with Pakistanis or Muslims? No, the reason is, West have got a very good experience by Sonia Gandhi who could now come in top post in Indian politics while being a Western Christian also while her husband, Rajiv Gandhi, was the man who opened door or Ayodhya Temple, one of the biggest follower of Lord Ram. While on the other hand, Jamima Khan first had to convert into Islam but still there is no chance that she may be accepted there as Ms Benajir Bhutto. In the same way Australians have a very good experience of getting married with Buddhists girls of Thailand who proved themselves loyal to Australians. West always wants to get Indian Hindus/ Buddhists and use Pakistanis and other Muslims.
