Saifullah Sani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,339
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Pakistani leadership need blood to stand united against Terrorism how pathetic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
did we ask your openion in india they have been chaning history all those big forts which belongs to muslims were converted to hindu in histories. all your cities name is different cuz it was given by muslims ..
tumhari naslain to nafratoon per pal rahi hain .. juth to badla ja sakta hai.
you have bigger problems solve yours i am not here to argu with you guys to waste my time
SOB !!! Cowards!.
Attacking innocent childrens.What type of scums are them?
Sure that was the time , when Americans were pleasing India after Mumbai attacks?Not really.
It was American agencies, and it was American researchers into the families of recruits to these organisations. These research documents are readily available in print.
Try again.
How foolishly you believed that my friend.. Kashmir voting percentage in recent election was more than 70% that gives some hint..indians still fail to realize difference between terrorism and freedom fighters.. Kashmir is different than what happend in mumbai .. Hafiz sahab is against army brutality in Kashmir.. here we are victim of faceless terrorists TTP is backed by many foreign agencies.
there isnt any good or bad terrorist.. Pakistan is not supporting Taliban in Afghanistan matter fact not involve in anything in afg which US appreciated Pakistans efforts against terrorism helped them even in Afg of recent visit of General Raheel Shareef's visit to US..
questions now is did these terrorist have indian tooth paste brushes, dry fruits with them? dont you think its easy to add those things to Bash india?
& then INDIA was part of Pakistan ?
Sure that's why Pakistan wasnt been a member of UN?No, India was never part of Pakistan.
If you read the Independence Act of the British Parliament, it gave independence to India, except for those parts that would be taken away to constitute Pakistan.
Zafrulla Khan lost his attempt to get Pakistani membership of the UNO by claiming that it had inherited the Indian membership, and it was established that it was not two equal countries created, but one created out of the other.
Whatever this means.
After 9/11, there is no confusion about the meaning of the word terrorism.
Hafiz saaed openly says Jihad against India. I think as here is unrest in Pakistan, he want to spread unrest in India too by Jihad.Unfortunately here People still believe him as Human right advocate but there are also liberals which knows the reality of those terrorist.There is NO difference between terrorists and freedom fighters. Hafiz Saeed is an organiser, not a human rights advocate. In every meeting, he calls for violent action against India and Indian institutions.
Fanatic Huh.. And yet the worlds most elite leaders and countries are admiring Modi and giving him red carpet.. Even the Sydney siege was covered by Indian Media very well.. You know Pakistanis like (and not all Pakistanis) cant think out of the box.. Your thought-process starts and ends at India eccentric Hatred.. The day you stop categorizing Terrorists, you would find Pakistan a much much better place...
It is sad and unfortunate that even when every single Indian on this forum has condemned the incident, even when many of us on other fora are opposing those insensitive idiots who keep saying sanctimonious and ill-timed things about the predictability of terrorism harming terrorists and the sponsors of terrorism, there is a small section of the Pakistani membership, and, outside the forum, a number of journalists and a charlatan, who keep making totally unfounded references to Indian involvement.
No, India was never part of Pakistan.
If you read the Independence Act of the British Parliament, it gave independence to India, except for those parts that would be taken away to constitute Pakistan.
Zafrulla Khan lost his attempt to get Pakistani membership of the UNO by claiming that it had inherited the Indian membership, and it was established that it was not two equal countries created, but one created out of the other.
Whatever this means.
After 9/11, there is no confusion about the meaning of the word terrorism.
How foolishly you believed that my friend.. Kashmir voting percentage in recent election was more than 70% that gives some hint..
Only one question, who is head of TTP and where does he belong??
Wow !Why the surprise? If you look at every discussion after a terrorist attack in Pakistan over the years that you & I have been on this forum which has been claimed by some terrorist group or the other, it takes just a short period after the initial numbness & the anger to go back to the old bogey. I didn't much participate on this thread except to post a BBC article on a shoe photo and a reply to your post but I did think that it would be less that 12 odd hours before some here revert to type. That's exactly what has happened. Little wonder Pakistan has so much difficulty in fighting their enemy, they prefer to spend their time searching for their "true" enemy and making comments about retaliatory terrorism like the one line in the post that you reported. It's why they glorify Hafiz Saeed. They simply seem unable to appreciate that Indians can feel deep pain & anguish about this attack while still not being enamoured of the Pakistani State.
This attack was pretty horrifying to me personally & I'm sure it was to most Indians. I'm haunted by the video of an woman rushing about desperately to search (I assume) for her child, as I was by the man who had lost his nephew(s?) & was crying about the fact that it takes 20 years to raise a child & the terrorists didn't even take 20 minutes......
I had actually heard about the attack on the forum & when I did check the news, I had heard of about 13-14 deaths & there was reporting that the rest of the children had been rescued. I was then off the news grid for a while & when I again checked on the forum, I saw a figure of over 100 which is when I switched on the TV. It was a terrible, sickening feeling that was unexplainable, maybe the facts that kids were targeted deliberately somehow made this different from all the other equally horrifying attacks. I'm sure millions of Indians felt the same way, yet we are here arguing with guys who will believe that this was somehow India's doing. Attacking children in a school? Towards what aim? I rarely join issue with most of these guys because they simply are living in a state of altered reality. Nothing you or I say will have an impact.