PCB to demand around $70 million from BCCI as compensation

[El Sidd]

just like pcb your posts are gibberish and make no sense, hence I said go to the courts instead of wasting every ones time. All this competitive crap comes from a country which was plotting occupation of kargil when peace talks were underway.

How is kargil related to sports?

We had sports during wars in developed nations.

Two separate things.

BCCI should pay PCB voluntarily otherwise PCB will lose another case at international level

India should do Pakistan's moral boosting time to time just like losing last ICC T20 finals

Otherwise also Pakistani Foreign reserves are hitting rock bottom therefore shouldn't one be helping ones neighbour ?

Dude its Pakistan.

People have too much money. Its literally pouring out.

And we have enough foreign reserves to last any modern warfare.

 

[Shockwave]

Pakistanis aint gonna get a penny, period.

The select few who reads 'the Hindu' seems to be the secular, educated and belongs to niche class of Indians.

Same article appeared in TOI, times of India, read it and then read the comments, almost all of the comments were full of hatred, puerile, using abusive language for Pakistan...senile and full of vitriol.

Who belongs to the class or caste who reads this TOI newspaper online edition. And this is a rule and not an exception whenever some news is reported about Pakistan(they will make sure that the news is a negative one).

@JD_In

Why go that far? Just read the comments of your fellow pakistanis on pdf and then you may stop complaining.

 

[Laozi]

Dude its Pakistan.

People have too much money. Its literally pouring out.

And we have enough foreign reserves to last any modern warfare.

After reading your post, We feel proud of being the neighbours of such a resourceful country

I read somewhere that Pakistan's foreign reserves are dipping sharply therefore I made this friendly suggestion.

Since you people are loaded with money then you should fight this case out at International level, as countries normally do, and lose it as usual as Pakistan regularly does

 

[El Sidd]

After reading your post, We feel proud of being the neighbours of such a resourceful country

I read somewhere that Pakistan's foreign reserves are dipping sharply therefore I made this friendly suggestion.

Since you people are loaded with money then you should fight this case out at International level, as countries normally do, and lose it as usual Pakistan regularly does

If needs be.

We shall

 

[oOo]

How is kargil related to sports?

We had sports during wars in developed nations.

Two separate things.



Dude its Pakistan.

People have too much money. Its literally pouring out.

And we have enough foreign reserves to last any modern warfare.

Give money to PCB, they are simply going mad in absence of it.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Do you know BCCI had not signed contract with PCB? PCB arguments were in ICC that since Indian government had ordered BCCI to not play cricket with PCB, still they played international multilateral games like world cup or championship trophy but they didn't played bilateral matches. So they must pay. I am wondering what logic is that? India is part of UN and other multilateral groups, and Pakistan is also there in few of them. So as per Pakistan logic if India took part in UN or other such organizations meeting, it should have done bilateral meetings also with Pakistan, otherwise Pakistan will claim penalty. How will a person or country fight over something which doesn't have a ground logic?

India is part of UN and they never signed an agreement for bilateral dialogs so we never insisted.
and cricket is not UN membership.

 

[INDIAISM]

firstly people need to understand what is MOU
What is a 'Memorandum of Understanding - MOU'

A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a nonbinding agreement between two or more parties outlining the terms and details of an understanding, including each parties' requirements and responsibilities. An MOU is often the first stage in the formation of a formal contract.



Read more: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mou.asp#ixzz4uEFrejvk

 

[RISING SUN]

First of all, what are you smoking? The UN is completely different from a sports organisation, its a ridiculous comparison to make.

Secondly, an MoU was signed that 6 games would be played, BCCI violated that MoU claiming it didnt have permission from its government, and yet continued to play other games against Pakistan. I dont know the content of this MoU, but if it contains all the elements to be legally considered a contract, then violating it is a serious offence.



If you sign a legal agreement, then you are bound to honour that agreement. Laws and their enforcement aren't based on emotional feelings genius.

My friend, MOU is not a contract, thus non-legal, it is signed as advisory in economic terms or co-operative in sports/strategic terms. Until and unless one signs the contract, person is free from any legalities. MOU means only MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. It's not contract. Thank you.

First of all, what are you smoking? The UN is completely different from a sports organisation, its a ridiculous comparison to make.

Secondly, an MoU was signed that 6 games would be played, BCCI violated that MoU claiming it didnt have permission from its government, and yet continued to play other games against Pakistan. I dont know the content of this MoU, but if it contains all the elements to be legally considered a contract, then violating it is a serious offence.



If you sign a legal agreement, then you are bound to honour that agreement. Laws and their enforcement aren't based on emotional feelings genius.

I have given you the UN & whole lot of other organizations as a example. A country is bound to attend UN meetings or its decisions even though it might have enemy states as well within it. However same can't be claimed bilateral meetings saying if you can meet in multi-lateral fora, you must meet bilaterally as well. That doesn't work in international law. Bilateral and international leagues are different and have different rules applicable.

Its within the law to ask for compensation if business got affected. It's sports even Israelis and Palestinians play each other.

A childish attitude towards arts sports and academics only hampers the 3rd world countries growth.

It's childish for Pakistan for repeatedly asking for play cricket when India is not going to allow it and there is no business affected if there is no contract.

Talk about competitive spirit... Woooo

If you weren't so naive about it.

I could say let's settle it in some sports.

The world don't even remember what were those. Nobody cares for a brownie on brownie thing.

We do care about our lives, so we can't play cricket with those who can indirectly contribute towards terrorists which will ultimately try to kill us either in my city Mumbai, or Delhi or anywhere else. Sorry we will let it pass, we don't wish to play with you guys. Thank You.

How is kargil related to sports?

We had sports during wars in developed nations.

Two separate things.



Dude its Pakistan.

People have too much money. Its literally pouring out.

And we have enough foreign reserves to last any modern warfare.

If that would had been the case, PCB would not have been facing cash crunch, do you require supporting links? If yes do let me know. Thank You.

 

[agamdilawari]

Dumbos who can't udnerstand difference between MOU and a CONTRACT often faces a thrashing and same thing is coming for PCB.

 

[RISING SUN]

India is part of UN and they never signed an agreement for bilateral dialogs so we never insisted.
and cricket is not UN membership.

Are bhai, you literally took the words, its just logic. Consider UN meeting as World cup and bilateral meeting as bilateral cricket match. A country has obligation to be part of importent UN meetings and follow its decisions as it is legal. However 2 separate countries are not legally bound to have meeting if one of them wants and another one doesn't want. See the similar logic or more clarity required. Thank you.

 

[El Sidd]

Give money to PCB, they are simply going mad in absence of it.

Lol
They are losing hair as well

My friend, MOU is not a contract, thus non-legal, it is signed as advisory in economic terms or co-operative in sports/strategic terms. Until and unless one signs the contract, person is free from any legalities. MOU means only MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. It's not contract. Thank you.


I have given you the UN & whole lot of other organizations as a example. A country is bound to attend UN meetings or its decisions even though it might have enemy states as well within it. However same can't be claimed bilateral meetings saying if you can meet in multi-lateral fora, you must meet bilaterally as well. That doesn't work in international law. Bilateral and international leagues are different and have different rules applicable.


It's childish for Pakistan for repeatedly asking for play cricket when India is not going to allow it and there is no business affected if there is no contract.


We do care about our lives, so we can't play cricket with those who can indirectly contribute towards terrorists which will ultimately try to kill us either in my city Mumbai, or Delhi or anywhere else. Sorry we will let it pass, we don't wish to play with you guys. Thank You.


If that would had been the case, PCB would not have been facing cash crunch, do you require supporting links? If yes do let me know. Thank You.

Na khelo

Har jagah kapre phaar kar rona shuru hojate ho

 

[ito]

Pakistan Cricket Board need to stop asking BCCI for just a Match. The prestige of PCB is at stake. Who keep on asking for a Match when the other party says it doesn't want to play.

As on the agreement, I don't think it is a proper MoU. Again in the 'MoU', there is a clause which says BCCI cannot play Pakistan if Indian government doesn't consent.

 

[RISING SUN]

Lol
They are losing hair as well



Na khelo

Har jagah kapre phaar kar rona shuru hojate ho

We are enjoying India-Australian 5th match, you are most welcome to be in visitors stand.

 

[El Sidd]

We are enjoying India-Australian 5th match, you are most welcome to be in visitors stand.

Thek hai aap khelen.
Lagaan dekh longa me.
Esa lagayga match dekh lia

 

[Flash_Ninja]

My friend, MOU is not a contract, thus non-legal, it is signed as advisory in economic terms or co-operative in sports/strategic terms. Until and unless one signs the contract, person is free from any legalities. MOU means only MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. It's not contract. Thank you.

No, an MoU can legally be considered a contract if it includes all the elements to be considered one, how many MoU's contain specific details like dates, frequency, or other conditions? It seems to me that this was more likely a contract.

I have given you the UN & whole lot of other organizations as a example. A country is bound to attend UN meetings or its decisions even though it might have enemy states as well within it. However same can't be claimed bilateral meetings saying if you can meet in multi-lateral fora, you must meet bilaterally as well. That doesn't work in international law. Bilateral and international leagues are different and have different rules applicable.

You are grasping at straws, please stop making this dumb comparison.