Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even some of the ships delivered to Navy was substandard in initial days and look where Navy is standing now..If army had supported indegenious maal, things would have much different..
Then why are you guys saying that those who criticize the Army are fools??....
According to your logic, a doctor(say) cannot criticize the politicians for corruption.....he has to become a politician and cleanse the system....
A Bank clerk(say) cannot protest/criticize police inaction(in any case)......he has to join the police force and do the job himself....
A Taxi driver(say) cannot criticize a doctor for 'dereliction of duty' which might have resulted in the death of his near ones(say) ....... he has to become a doctor and show how things are done....
..............
..............
That is, according to your logic, no-one can criticize any other person for anything in this God-dammed world.........
I suppose, you've never criticized anyone in your life so far......you always did the job yourself.
For all the 'Experts' DRDO does RnD not manufacturing. The INSAS is a fine rifle, even fires bullet launched gernades, does everything the army orginally wanted the rifle to do. The problem cam with OFB which is not DRDO!
Same is true for the Arjun.
Stop calling people with PHDs stupid. Its okay to critizice but remember how the Army is not a clean face. There are servicing officers within in India who are on Russia's industrail complex pay roll. Even if the Arjun is inferior to the T-90, how does a 60 ton tank rank up with a 45 ton tank? there is no comparision as this is apples and oranges.
It is the army who is the end-user of the product. If they are unhappy with something they have a right to reject. For the sake of going desi the national security cannot be compromised. Why should the army risk their lives and India's security by buying local weapons if they get better weapons from abroad for the same money? What is more important for you, the safety of the country or desi weapons?
The army did not say it is boycotting DRDO. If the DRDO is making good products the army will definitely buy. And this is exactly what Mr. Parrikar has told. He has asked DRDO to be more professional. Now will you accuse Mr. Parrikar of being corrupt?
@oFFbEAT - You are very casually throwing around charges of corruption. If armed forces are so corrupt as to buy inferior products because of bribes it is not only a big scandal but also poses serious threats to the country. Are you trying to suggest that? Or are you trying to suggest that armed forces of India can not be trusted?
@COLDHEARTED AVIATOR - It's no use talking sense to them. They will think you are trolling for stating the obvious.
That's because of the media reports that have come out indicating the corruption stories. Yes the army needs to get the best equipment. But to act as if there have been no acts of corruption in the Army or wrong doings as indicated by the post earlier viz T90 or Arjun is just turning one's head the other way.It is funny how common civilians know so much about corruption in army and who all are corrupt.
You my friend, are unable to get rid of your colonial mentality. For you, indigenous products are always and has to be substandard....even if foreign products are under-performing....It is the army who is the end-user of the product. If they are unhappy with something they have a right to reject. For the sake of going desi the national security cannot be compromised. Why should the army risk their lives and India's security by buying local weapons if they get better weapons from abroad for the same money? What is more important for you, the safety of the country or desi weapons?...
Even when people are giving you proof about Army's intentional sidelining of 'Arjun', you're in no position to accept that.....as I said, for you, Russian T-90 has to be better than 'desi' Arjun no matter what....The army did not say it is boycotting DRDO. If the DRDO is making good products the army will definitely buy..
I've no issue with Mr. Parrikar 'straightening up' DRDO, in-fact, that's what I want, along with 'straightening up' of corrupt Army officials....I'm willing to look at both sides of the coin, you guys are NOT willing to look at one side at-all, giving a total 'clean-chit' to the Army.....And this is exactly what Mr. Parrikar has told. He has asked DRDO to be more professional. Now will you accuse Mr. Parrikar of being corrupt?...
India buying faulty MiG parts: Russia - The Times of India@oFFbEAT - You are very casually throwing around charges of corruption. If armed forces are so corrupt as to buy inferior products because of bribes it is not only a big scandal but also poses serious threats to the country. Are you trying to suggest that? Or are you trying to suggest that armed forces of India can not be trusted?...
....such shameless act by Army??Bro, it was recently revealed that the army purposefully gave the T90 relaxed parameters against the Arjun in trials, who does that? This was also the trials where Arjun performed on par or better. And to add they have been changing the requirements of the tank over and over and over again.
This tank was dead before it even started, because of the lack of communication between the army and drdo. Unlike the navy and it's own projects.
That's the only explanation I find plausible behind Indian Army's over affection towards Russian T-90s....... There are servicing officers within in India who are on Russia's industrail complex pay roll....
You seems to be 1971 war veteran or Kargil PVC winner. You can go to D.F.I and check analysis by those who actually used INSAS 1B1 like Kunal Biswas not some tom dick harry like you or @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR who can't tell the difference between a carbine and an assault rifle.It is funny how common civilians know so much about corruption in army and who all are corrupt.
You seems to be 1971 war veteran or Kargil PVC winner. You can go to D.F.I and check analysis by those who actually used INSAS 1B1 like Kunal Biswas not some tom dick harry like you or @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR who can't tell the difference between a carbine and an assault rifle.
PS-Not a personal attack.
Interesting, Please enlighten us more about these idiots who have never touched the Insas. I know the idiot you are referring to and rest assured he has shot every thing from Ak47, to Scar, FnFAL, G3's, Ar15 and Barret M107's. Muzzle velocities and terminal ballistics are bread and butter for most shooting enthusiasts, not copy paste from wiki btwYou are 100% right.
I was in a discussion about INSAS and these idiots who have never even touched the INSAS are telling me that a soldier who has used this gun in field operations is wrong and they using their physics data available on wikipedia are right.
Then these morons accuse the Army of corruption for not buying Arjun and going for T90 which by the way is a highly rated tank even by the western analyst.
I am waiting for the day when INSAS gets out of Indian army inventory.....
I was reffering to the Physics guy not you.You were open to know more about the problems in the rifle..others were not.Interesting, Please enlighten us more about these idiots who have never touched the Insas. I know the idiot you are referring to and rest assured he has shot every thing from Ak47, to Scar, FnFAL, G3's, Ar15 and Barret M107's. Muzzle velocities and terminal ballistics are bread and butter for most shooting enthusiasts, not copy paste from wiki btw
You seems to be 1971 war veteran or Kargil PVC winner. You can go to D.F.I and check analysis by those who actually used INSAS 1B1 like Kunal Biswas not some tom dick harry like you or @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR who can't tell the difference between a carbine and an assault rifle.
PS-Not a personal attack.
You seems to be 1971 war veteran or Kargil PVC winner. You can go to D.F.I and check analysis by those who actually used INSAS 1B1 like Kunal Biswas not some tom dick harry like you or @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR who can't tell the difference between a carbine and an assault rifle.
PS-Not a personal attack.